And depend on python-light only if python-lxml is selected.
Same thing for python3-lxml.
Otherwise, this builds both Python & Python3 intepreters.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Similar to LEDE/OpenWrt's Build/Compile/Default rule,
and other similarities like this.
This should allow Python packages to define
PyBuild/Compile rules to do specific stuff per
package.
The advantage of using these (over just overriding
Build/Compile) is the VARIANT mechanism that is
in place to support packaging both for Python & Python3.
So, PyBuild/Compile will get picked up for the Python
variant build, and Py3Build/Compile will get picked
up for the Python3 variant build.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Fixes: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/4548
When running parallel jobs, there are chances
that the Build/InstallDev rule may run before
the Host/Install rule and fail the build.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
If you build python/python3 and later decide to build
python(3)-setuptools and/or python(3)-pip, the build won't
re-run without adding `CONFIG_PACKAGE_python(3)-setuptools`
and `CONFIG_PACKAGE_python(3)-pip`.
Seems to resolve issue:
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/4529
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Seems it's called underlinking that's happening only
on Ubuntu 12.04 with libressl (that comes from LEDE's
tools folder).
Link here:
https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1870586
I'm still reading about this a bit.
Since I don't really get it.
But applying that fix (as in the link) seems to fix compiling
on Ubuntu 12.04, and tried also on 16.04 (to make sure).
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
The Build/InstallDev rule is activated only for target builds.
But if someone needs only the host Python, then
these files need to be installed in this phase, and not Build/InstallDev
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
OVS has PKG_BUILD_DEPENDS:=python-six/host as dep.
But that doesn't seem to work, since the PKG_NAME:=six
So, this change renames the PKG_NAME to python-six, to
make it clear it's Python package.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
If there is only Python bytecodes, then
the __init__.py script will be concatenated, and
the __init__.pyc as well.
This is becase this bit `path = os.path.join(path, '__init__'+extension)`
is iterated twice.
This is a bug in Python3, also because we ship bytecodes
instead of source code [ with Python & Python3 ].
Python is not affected.
Reported-by: Mirko Vogt <mirko@nanl.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
This package requires libxml2 & libxslt to be built, has some
C code so it's not installable via pip.
It needs cross-compilation.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
This is in essence fixes pip3.
That means pip3 will ship without Python byte-codes
for a while, until I'll find a better way to fix it.
I couldn't think of a not-very hack-ish way of doing it.
The only draw-back of this, will be that pip3 will run
a bit slower ; but that should be ok for a while.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
python3-pip & python3-setuptools have slightly
different installation mechanisms.
We need to remove the __pycache__ folders.
Seems they're generated.
This also reduces the size of the python3-pip &
python3-setuptools packages.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
I admit this may be be a bit aggressive, but the lang
folder is getting cluttered/filled up with Python, PHP, Perl,
Ruby, etc. packages.
Makes sense to try to group them into per-lang folders.
I took the Pythons.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Well, they're not yet compiled, but in the next commit
they should be.
People have been complaining [citation needed] to me
via email or via Github that Python's performance is crap
because it packages sources directly and they're not compiled.
And Python has to compile the sources on each run, and
on-the-fly.
Allowing compilation caching is also a no-no, because
I'll get complaints that the flash storage fills up
whenever a Python app runs.
So, to give the user a choice, the new de-facto packaging
for Python packages will be:
* ship compiled + [ preferably ] optimized files
* package sources separately
The problem is that this doubles the number of packages
in LEDE/OpenWrt, but build-times should not suffer a big
hit, since the compilation is done once, and the
install phase should not be too intensive.
Oh, and people don't need ship source packages if
they don't want to.
To do that, a packager needs to just call
`$(eval $(call BuildPackage,python-<package>-src))`
The `python-` prefix is important.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Well, this slipped by for some time.
This should make the Python core packages even more lighter.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
It's not 100% aligned with the ncurses' definition.
Reported-by: Arturo Rinaldi <arturo@arduino.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
LEDE now provides libncursesw by default [even for libncurses].
No need to keep this patch around.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Python comes with it's own builtin libffi lib, which
seems easier to use for the host build, than trying
to use the one from the package feeds.
Also, dropping `005-fix-libffi-x86-64-configure.patch`
Not needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
I just found out that, that the BUILD_VARIANT var
is not set for the host build, so technically this code
would never get used.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
As both LEDE and OpenWrt have STAGING_DIR_HOSTPKG now, we can start to rely
on it. See 73b7f55424 for more information on
STAGING_DIR_HOSTPKG.
STAGING_DIR_HOSTPKG won't actually be changed before the first LEDE release
(it is equivalent to $(STAGING_DIR)/host), so this simple search/replace
cleanup is safe to apply. Doing this cleanup now will be useful for the
Gluon project (an OpenWrt/LEDE based firmware framework) for experimenting
with modifying STAGING_DIR_HOSTPKG before doing this in the LEDE upstream.
Also fixes a typo in the dbus Makefile ("STAGIND_DIR").
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
STAGING_DIR_HOSTPKG is now defined in both OpenWrt and LEDE, so we can
start to rely on it.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
Fixes: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/3767
Since commit:
f6e6341d89
libressl is built on the host-side.
Python picks it up [ via the openssl/* headers ] and assumes
it has SSL libs.
Compiling works fine, linking fails.
Doesn't look like it's because:
2fd5ce9488
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Most python packages use the same build rules & vars.
So, adding them in python-package.mk.
Also, preparing for using VARIANTs for python/python3 packages.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
PYTHON_FOR_BUILD is used to build the target python.
Nomally Python scripts detect fine the Python host interpreter
to use for building the Python target interpreter.
But, let's not leave it up to chance anymore.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
And apparently `--with-system-ffi` does not take any arguments.
But it's only in Python 3.6 that a check was added for that.
After checking, Python 2.7 does not take any args either
for `--with-system-ffi` ; so, remove it [for the case when this
change may get backported].
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Move the python-host.mk and python-package.mk includes after the definition of
common package variables. This is required to ensure that PKG_UNPACK is not set
to to the dummy "true" command which happens if PKG_SOURCE is not yet set.
Fixes the following error observed while attempting to build Python on a recent
LEDE version:
make[2]: Entering directory '.../lang/python'
true
[ ! -d ./src/ ] || cp -fpR ./src/* .../Python-2.7.12
Applying ./patches/001-enable-zlib.patch using plaintext:
can't find file to patch at input line 14
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
[...]
Patch failed! Please fix ./patches/001-enable-zlib.patch!
Makefile:242: recipe for target '.../Python-2.7.12/.prepared_...' failed
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
--sysconfigdir and --sbindir are obtained from --prefix
and --exec-prefix, so no need to have them explicitly
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Allows for more granularity with respect to python-host.mk
and python-package.mk inclusions.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
So that it can be included twice.
python-package.mk include python-host.mk, but at some point
in time python-host.mk is not exported to staging_dir yet.
So, to have in python's Makefile, we need to include it
in the Makefile, and to prevent double inclusion (if
python-host.mk is exported from a previous build), the
include guard is added.
Also, moved the includes after some vars were set.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Alexandru Ardelean
Daniel Golle
Matthias Schiffer
Jo-Philipp Wich