The problem with the `TestStateFullRound1` is that the state that we are observeing, `cs`, can advance to the next height before we query its data. Specifically, on line `388`, when we called `validatePrevote`, the `cs` State had already advanced to height 2, so querying that State for the votes of height 1 either yielded nil or an erroneous value. This change adds a `ensurePrevoteMatch` function that checks that the prevote occurred and checks that it is for the expected block at the same time. If this change looks reasonable I can just apply the same fix to all of the places where we perform `ensurePrevote` followed by `validatePrevote` to use this function instead.
* avoid re-signing vote when RHS and signbytes are equal
* avoid re-signing proposal when RHS and signbytes are equal
Co-authored-by: Callum Waters <cmwaters19@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: William Banfield <4561443+williambanfield@users.noreply.github.com>
*light: rpc /status returns status of light client ; code refactoring
light: moved lightClientInfo into light.go, renamed String to ID
test/e2e: Return light client trusted height instead of SyncInfo trusted height
test/e2e/start.go: Not waiting for light client to catch up in tests. Removed querying of syncInfo in start if the node is a light node
* light: Removed call to primary /status. Added trustedPeriod to light info
* light/provider: added ID function to return IP of primary and witnesses
* light/provider/http/http_test: renamed String() to ID()
This change has two main effects:
1. Remove most of the Async methods from the abci.Client interface.
Remaining are FlushAsync, CommitTxAsync, and DeliverTxAsync.
2. Rename the synchronous methods to remove the "Sync" suffix.
The rest of the change is updating the implementations, subsets, and mocks of
the interface, along with the call sites that point to them.
* Fix stringly-typed mock stubs.
* Rename helper method.
After #7592, @cmwaters noticed that the logic for re-using old timestamps for proposals may not work with proposer-based timestamps. This change removes the logic to re-use old proposal timestamps since it is no longer correct. Two proposals with different timestamps can no longer be treated as equivalent. Signing a proposal that only differs by timestamp in the new algorithm can be thought of as roughly equivalent to signing a proposal that only differs by `BlockID` in the old scheme.
I also investigated the codebase and checked for any place we updated a timestamp using the pattern `(Timestamp = |Timestamp: )` and saw no additional places where we are updating the timestamp of a proposal message.
Here is the output of that search:
```
privval/file.go:372: vote.Timestamp = timestamp
privval/file.go:453: lastVote.Timestamp = now
privval/file.go:454: newVote.Timestamp = now
internal/test/factory/commit.go:25: Timestamp: now,
internal/test/factory/vote.go:34: Timestamp: time,
internal/consensus/state.go:2261: Timestamp: cs.voteTime(),
internal/consensus/state.go:2286: vote.Timestamp = v.Timestamp
light/detector.go:414: ev.Timestamp = common.Time
light/detector.go:418: ev.Timestamp = trusted.Time
types/block.go:616: Timestamp: ts,
types/block.go:725: Timestamp: cs.Timestamp,
types/block.go:736: cs.Timestamp = csp.Timestamp
types/block.go:800: Timestamp: commitSig.Timestamp,
types/evidence.go:84: Timestamp: blockTime,
types/evidence.go:190: dve.Timestamp = evidenceTime
types/evidence.go:202: Timestamp: dve.Timestamp,
types/evidence.go:228: Timestamp: pb.Timestamp,
types/evidence.go:382: Timestamp: %v}#%X`,
types/evidence.go:491: l.Timestamp = evidenceTime
types/evidence.go:517: Timestamp: l.Timestamp,
types/evidence.go:546: Timestamp: lpb.Timestamp,
types/evidence.go:722: Timestamp: time,
types/vote.go:80: Timestamp: vote.Timestamp,
types/vote.go:216: Timestamp: vote.Timestamp,
types/vote.go:240: vote.Timestamp = pv.Timestamp
types/test_util.go:27: Timestamp: now,
types/proposal.go:44: Timestamp: tmtime.Now(),
types/proposal.go:132: pb.Timestamp = p.Timestamp
types/proposal.go:157: p.Timestamp = pp.Timestamp
types/canonical.go:49: Timestamp: proposal.Timestamp,
types/canonical.go:62: Timestamp: vote.Timestamp,
test/e2e/runner/evidence.go:186: Timestamp: evTime,
```
This averts a log-after-close issue. We should probably also chase the shutdown
issues, but since ABCI clients should generally only shut down once per process
I don't think this is a real priority, and the trace is hairy.
The test filter was looking for "TestGoFiles", which does not include tests in
a separate package (e.g., "package foo_test" for "package foo").
This caused several packages not to be tested in CI, including:
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/abci/client
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/crypto
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/crypto/tmhash
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/eventbus
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/evidence
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/inspect
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/jsontypes
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/libs/protoio
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/libs/sync
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/p2p/pex
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/pubsub
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/pubsub/query
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/pubsub/query/syntax
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/state/indexer
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/state/indexer/block/kv
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/json
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/log
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/os
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/light
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/light/provider/http
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/privval/grpc
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/proto/tendermint/blocksync
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/proto/tendermint/consensus
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/proto/tendermint/statesync
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/rpc/client
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/rpc/client/mock
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/test/e2e/tests
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/test/fuzz/mempool
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/test/fuzz/p2p/secretconnection
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/test/fuzz/rpc/jsonrpc/server
Updates #7626 and #7634.
The interaction between defers and t.Cleanup can be delicate.
For this case, which regularly flakes in CI, be explicit:
Defer the closes and waits before making any attempt to leaktest.
During file rotation and WAL shutdown, there was a race condition between users
of an autofile and its termination. To fix this, ensure operations on an
autofile are properly synchronized, and report errors when attempting to use an
autofile after it was closed.
Notably:
- Simplify the cancellation protocol between signal and Close.
- Exclude writers to an autofile during rotation.
- Add documentation about what is going on.
There is a lot more that could be improved here, but this addresses the more
obvious races that have been panicking unit tests.
## What does this pull request do?
This pull requests adds two metrics intended for use in calculating an experimental value for `MessageDelay`.
The metrics are as follows:
```
# HELP tendermint_consensus_complete_prevote_message_delay Difference in seconds between the proposal timestamp and the timestamp of the prevote that achieved 100% of the voting power in the prevote step.
# TYPE tendermint_consensus_complete_prevote_message_delay gauge
tendermint_consensus_complete_prevote_message_delay{chain_id="test-chain-aZbwF1"} 0.013025505
# HELP tendermint_consensus_quorum_prevote_message_delay Difference in seconds between the proposal timestamp and the timestamp of the prevote that achieved a quorum in the prevote step.
# TYPE tendermint_consensus_quorum_prevote_message_delay gauge
tendermint_consensus_quorum_prevote_message_delay{chain_id="test-chain-aZbwF1"} 0.013025505
```
## Why this change?
For more information on what these metrics are calculating, see #7202. The aim is to merge to backport these metrics to v0.34 and run nodes on a few popular chains with these metrics to determine the experimental values for `MessageDelay` on these popular chains and use these to select our default `SynchronyParams.MessageDelay` value.
## Why Gauges for the metrics?
Gauges allow us to overwrite the metric on each successive observation. We can then capture these metrics over time to track the highest and lowest observed value.
This commit changes the behaviour of the /unconfirmed_txs endpoint by replacing limit with a page and perPage parameter for pagination.
The test case for unconfirmed_txs have been accommodated to properly test this change and the documentation for the API as well.
M. J. Fromberger
Sam Kleinman
Alexander Shcherbakov
William Banfield
kmax.eth
Jasmina Malicevic
Gui
dependabot[bot]
Kene
Sergio Mena