It was reported via
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/5122#issuecomment-347395472
that if bluez-libs is selected as an installable package,
then the error below will show up:
```
* satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for python-light:
* bluez-libs *
* opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package python-light.
```
This looks like a limitation in the design of package deps,
and maybe a misuse of conditional deps (i.e. PACKAGE_bluez-libs:bluez-libs).
So, to fix this, an idea we're adding an extra symbol
that enfoces installation of bluez-libs if selected.
We also need to add a way to disable bluetooth build
if PYTHON(3)_BLUETOOTH_SUPPORT is de-selected.
Otherwise, bluetooth is installed and the socket
module is broken due to linker errors.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
This should hopefully fix the Python3 build on buildbot.
For a while I assumed it may be a build-bot issue, but
then looking through the packages repo [and finding
the bluez package] it looks like, if you try
to build all packages, Python3 detects the bluetooth
headers installed by bluez.
It looks like Python's bluetooth support was somewhat
broken ; it was not detecting the <bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
header, so a backport from Python3 to Python fixed that.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
That way some python packages can choose
to keep their egg-info dirs, if they want to, or they're needed.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Not sure how it can happen that the files are not
installed via the host build.
Maybe some SDK-like build.
Let's make sure they are installed via InstallDev rule too.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
The host pip install should have the host's CFLAGS, LDFLAGS, etc
available.
And not the target's flags.
Otherwise, weird things can happen when installing
packages (host-side) that need to build C code.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
The host pip install should have the host's CFLAGS, LDFLAGS, etc
available.
And not the target's flags.
Otherwise, weird things can happen when installing
packages (host-side) that need to build C code.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
To install Python packages host side, that
may be needed for a build.
The intent, is to try to reduce host-side Python
packages being installed via LEDE/OpenWrt build system.
Because those seem like a pain to maintain.
The idea is adapted from Yousong's `python-packages`
package.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Depending on execution order the `python-package-install.sh`
script would return a non-zero err code.
So, this enforces that all commands in the script
don't fail (via the `set -e` directive).
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Similar to LEDE/OpenWrt's Build/Compile/Default rule,
and other similarities like this.
This should allow Python packages to define
PyBuild/Compile rules to do specific stuff per
package.
The advantage of using these (over just overriding
Build/Compile) is the VARIANT mechanism that is
in place to support packaging both for Python & Python3.
So, PyBuild/Compile will get picked up for the Python
variant build, and Py3Build/Compile will get picked
up for the Python3 variant build.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
If you build python/python3 and later decide to build
python(3)-setuptools and/or python(3)-pip, the build won't
re-run without adding `CONFIG_PACKAGE_python(3)-setuptools`
and `CONFIG_PACKAGE_python(3)-pip`.
Seems to resolve issue:
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/4529
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Seems it's called underlinking that's happening only
on Ubuntu 12.04 with libressl (that comes from LEDE's
tools folder).
Link here:
https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1870586
I'm still reading about this a bit.
Since I don't really get it.
But applying that fix (as in the link) seems to fix compiling
on Ubuntu 12.04, and tried also on 16.04 (to make sure).
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
The Build/InstallDev rule is activated only for target builds.
But if someone needs only the host Python, then
these files need to be installed in this phase, and not Build/InstallDev
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
If there is only Python bytecodes, then
the __init__.py script will be concatenated, and
the __init__.pyc as well.
This is becase this bit `path = os.path.join(path, '__init__'+extension)`
is iterated twice.
This is a bug in Python3, also because we ship bytecodes
instead of source code [ with Python & Python3 ].
Python is not affected.
Reported-by: Mirko Vogt <mirko@nanl.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
This is in essence fixes pip3.
That means pip3 will ship without Python byte-codes
for a while, until I'll find a better way to fix it.
I couldn't think of a not-very hack-ish way of doing it.
The only draw-back of this, will be that pip3 will run
a bit slower ; but that should be ok for a while.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
python3-pip & python3-setuptools have slightly
different installation mechanisms.
We need to remove the __pycache__ folders.
Seems they're generated.
This also reduces the size of the python3-pip &
python3-setuptools packages.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
I admit this may be be a bit aggressive, but the lang
folder is getting cluttered/filled up with Python, PHP, Perl,
Ruby, etc. packages.
Makes sense to try to group them into per-lang folders.
I took the Pythons.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Alexandru Ardelean
Mirko Vogt