Notes:
- drop un-needed patches
- bump kernel support up to 4.9
- switch from git repo to release tarball
- use OVS intree kernel module ; seems that using the kernel module
from the package has certain issues due to the glue/backport code
that tries to adapt to many kernel versions and has a potential
to mess up ; not to mention, the glue code makes the kmod
a few times larger than it should be
- tested on x86_64 VM
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
When only kmod-openvswitch is enabled, which commonly happens during LEDE
release builds, there is no need to build the entire userland of openvswitch
as this is done at a later stage on systems dedicated to build only userspace
packages.
This change conditionalizes the dependency on python, which means that python
prerequisites are only compiled if the openvswitch-python package is enabled,
which allows us to eliminate the entire python dependency chain.
Furthermore, this change sets MAKE_PATH to the kernel module sub directory
if only kmod-openvswitch is enabled which causes the openvswitch build system
to only process sources related to the .ko files.
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
I guess these were left since some initial OVS package versions.
They were fine up until recently.
Some of the build artifacts got a little messy and thus the
OpenWRT OVS package got a little messy.
This cleans it up a bit.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Most patches for 4.1 are no longer needed, only a minor patch to fix a
missing WAIT_ANY constant. 2.5.0 depends on nf_conntrack (ipv4 and ipv6)
Signed-off-by: Jeroen van Bemmel <jvb127@gmail.com>
caught on build-bot:
make -C /store/buildbot/slave/ramips/build/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kec+dsp_musl-1.1.11/linux-ramips_rt305x/linux-3.18.21 M=/store/buildbot/slave/ramips/build/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kec+dsp_musl-1.1.11/openvswitch-2.4.0/datapath/linux modules
make[7]: Entering directory `/store/buildbot/slave/ramips/build/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kec+dsp_musl-1.1.11/linux-ramips_rt305x/linux-3.18.21'
Makefile:610: arch/mipsel/Makefile: No such file or directory
Declare LINUX_KARCH to package's build-system to resolv this.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
After a few discussions with the guys working on OpenVSwitch
they've recommended we use the EXTRA_CFLAGS env var for setting
flags for the kernel module.
They've updated the trunk with a patch to accomodate that.
That patch is also in this commit, and replaces a patch that I proposed.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
When OVS detects a kernel version >= 3.12 it does not build
it's own vxlan module and tries to use the kernel's, when building
the OVS kernel module.
I also pushed a patch to the OpenWRT trunk to add a +kmod-vxlan package.
This will add the kernel's vxlan.ko kernel module if it exists.
So, for kernel >= 3.12, this package should exist and be installed
when installing OVS.
Tested on OpenWRT trunk with kernel 3.14.18.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Seems that while fixing the build for GCC 4.9
I broke the build for GCC 4.8, because that KCFLAG I added
causes a build error (since it's not recognized).
The fix is to add KCFLAG only when GCC 4.9 is used.
OpenVSwitch now builds successfully with GCC 4.8 and 4.9.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Requires python package.
Required by other openvswitch subpackages (like openvswitch-python).
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
This is default if ovs is started through ovs-ctl but we start it directly, hence
tell procd to use nice -10 for ovs.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
According to the NEWS message from the main OVS site:
http://openvswitch.org/releases/NEWS-2.3.0
Excerpt:
- ovs-controller has been renamed test-controller. It is no longer
packaged or installed by default, because too many users assumed
incorrectly that ovs-controller was a necessary or desirable part
of an Open vSwitch deployment.
Current feed was updated based on a feed that packaged OVS 1.9,
and subsequently updated.
For now, we'll remove it, since it's not required.
When I tested the feed, I tested it on a setup that has been configured
some time ago, and does not have that package enabled.
So, I'll remove it to prevent confusion.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean ardeleanalex@gmail.com