Anton Kaliaev
3478de50a1
``` me: so we are executing them in order and receiving them in order and there is no way we could receive them out of order (due to network or something else), correct? ebuchman: if we receive them out of order, ABCI is broken ebuchman: so it is possible, if the ABCI server we're talking to is not implementing the spec ebuchman: but that shouldn't justify us building a map ``` |
7 years ago | |
---|---|---|
.. | ||
tx | expose `/tx?hash="XXXXXXXXXXXX"` RPC call | 7 years ago |
errors.go | move handshake to consensus package | 7 years ago |
execution.go | no need for map - tx responses should arrive in order (Refs #237) | 7 years ago |
execution_test.go | execution test | 7 years ago |
log.go | Refactor to move common libraries out of project | 9 years ago |
state.go | expose `/tx?hash="XXXXXXXXXXXX"` RPC call | 7 years ago |
state_test.go | move handshake to state, use Handshaker, more tests | 8 years ago |