We should not set cache-control headers on RPC responses. HTTP caching
interacts poorly with resources that are expected to change frequently, or
whose rate of change is unpredictable.
More subtly, all calls to the POST endpoint use the same URL, which means a
cacheable response from one call may actually "hide" an uncacheable response
from a subsequent one. This is less of a problem for the GET endpoints, but
that means the behaviour of RPCs varies depending on which HTTP method your
client happens to use. Websocket requests were already marked statically
uncacheable, adding yet a third combination.
To address this:
- Stop setting cache-control headers.
- Update the tests that were checking for those headers.
- Remove the flags to request cache-control.
Apart from affecting the HTTP response headers, this change does not modify the
behaviour of any of the RPC methods.
This is a very small change, but removes a method from the
`service.Service` interface (a win!) and forces callers to explicitly
pass loggers in to objects during construction rather than (later)
injecting them. There's not a real need for this kind of lazy
construction of loggers, and I think a decent potential for confusion
for mutable loggers.
The main concern I have is that this changes the constructor API for
ABCI clients. I think this is fine, and I suspect that as we plumb
contexts through, and make changes to the RPC services there'll be a
number of similar sorts of changes to various (quasi) public
interfaces, which I think we should welcome.
A few notes:
- this is not all the deletion that we can do, but this is the most
"simple" case: it leaves in shims, and there's some trivial
additional cleanup to the transport that can happen but that
requires writing more code, and I wanted this to be easy to review
above all else.
- This should land *after* we cut the branch for 0.35, but I'm
anticipating that to happen soon, and I wanted to run this through
CI.
This change does two things:
1. It fixes the json fuzzer to account for receiving array results. Arrays are returned by the rpc server when the input data is an array.
2. Adds a `fuzz_test.go` file and corresponding `testdata` directory containing the failing test case.
This seems like a reasonable way to add and track previous crash issues in our fuzz test cases. The upcoming stdlib go fuzz tool does effectively this automatically.
* test/fuzz: fix rpc, secret_connection and pex tests
- ignore empty data in rpc
- provide correct IP in pex
- spawn a goroutine for Write and do multiple Read(s)
* test/fuzz: fix init in pex test
* test/fuzz: assign NewServeMux to global var
* test/fuzz: only try to Unmarshal if blob is not empty
* run fuzz tests for PRs which modify fuzz tests themselves
* test/fuzz: move MakeSwitch into init
Fixes#5899 by renaming a bunch of P2P Protobuf entities (while maintaining wire compatibility):
* `Message` to `PexMessage` (as it's only used for PEX messages).
* `PexAddrs` to `PexResponse`.
* `PexResponse.Addrs` to `PexResponse.Addresses`.
* `NetAddress` to `PexAddress` (as it's only used by PEX).
Co-authored-by: Emmanuel T Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
Closes#5907
- add init-corpus to blockchain reactor
- remove validator-set FromBytes test
now that we have proto, we don't need to test it! bye amino
- simplify mempool test
do we want to test remote ABCI app?
- do not recreate mux on every crash in jsonrpc test
- update p2p pex reactor test
- remove p2p/listener test
the API has changed + I did not understand what it's tested anyway
- update secretconnection test
- add readme and makefile
- list inputs in readme
- add nightly workflow
- remove blockchain fuzz test
EncodeMsg / DecodeMsg no longer exist
M. J. Fromberger
Sam Kleinman
William Banfield
Sharad Chand
M. J. Fromberger
Cuong Manh Le
Aleksandr Bezobchuk
JayT106
Anton Kaliaev
Erik Grinaker