comment out failing consensus tests for now

rewrite rpc httpclient to use new pubsub package

import pubsub as tmpubsub, query as tmquery

make event IDs constants
EventKey -> EventTypeKey

rename EventsPubsub to PubSub

mempool does not use pubsub

rename eventsSub to pubsub

new subscribe API

fix channel size issues and consensus tests bugs

refactor rpc client

add missing discardFromChan method

add mutex

rename pubsub to eventBus

remove IsRunning from WSRPCConnection interface (not needed)

add a comment in broadcastNewRoundStepsAndVotes

rename registerEventCallbacks to broadcastNewRoundStepsAndVotes

See https://dave.cheney.net/2014/03/19/channel-axioms

stop eventBuses after reactor tests

remove unnecessary Unsubscribe

return subscribe helper function

move discardFromChan to where it is used

subscribe now returns an err

this gives us ability to refuse to subscribe if pubsub is at its max
capacity.

use context for control overflow

cache queries

handle err when subscribing in replay_test

rename testClientID to testSubscriber

extract var

set channel buffer capacity to 1 in replay_file

fix byzantine_test

unsubscribe from single event, not all events

refactor httpclient to return events to appropriate channels

return failing testReplayCrashBeforeWriteVote test

fix TestValidatorSetChanges

refactor code a bit

fix testReplayCrashBeforeWriteVote

add comment

fix TestValidatorSetChanges

fixes from Bucky's review

update comment [ci skip]

test TxEventBuffer

update changelog

fix TestValidatorSetChanges (2nd attempt)

only do wg.Done when no errors

benchmark event bus

create pubsub server inside NewEventBus

only expose config params (later if needed)

set buffer capacity to 0 so we are not testing cache

new tx event format: key = "Tx" plus a tag {"tx.hash": XYZ}

This should allow to subscribe to all transactions! or a specific one
using a query: "tm.events.type = Tx and tx.hash = '013ABF99434...'"

use TimeoutCommit instead of afterPublishEventNewBlockTimeout

TimeoutCommit is the time a node waits after committing a block, before
it goes into the next height. So it will finish everything from the last
block, but then wait a bit. The idea is this gives it time to hear more
votes from other validators, to strengthen the commit it includes in the
next block. But it also gives it time to hear about new transactions.

waitForBlockWithUpdatedVals

rewrite WAL crash tests

Task:
test that we can recover from any WAL crash.

Solution:
the old tests were relying on event hub being run in the same thread (we
were injecting the private validator's last signature).

when considering a rewrite, we considered two possible solutions: write
a "fuzzy" testing system where WAL is crashing upon receiving a new
message, or inject failures and trigger them in tests using something
like https://github.com/coreos/gofail.

remove sleep

no cs.Lock around wal.Save

test different cases (empty block, non-empty block, ...)

comments

add comments

test 4 cases: empty block, non-empty block, non-empty block with smaller part size, many blocks

fixes as per Bucky's last review

reset subscriptions on UnsubscribeAll

use a simple counter to track message for which we panicked

also, set a smaller part size for all test cases

Addressing feedback from @ebuchman

Follow up of PR https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/pull/724
For https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/issues/708

Reported initially in #708, this bug was reconfirmed
by the fuzzer.

This fix ensures that:
* if the user doesn't pass in `"id"` that we send them back
a message in an error telling them to send `"id"`. Previously
we let the handler return a 200 with nothing.
* passing in nil `params` doesn't crash
* not passing in `params` doesn't crash
* passing in non-JSON parseable data to `params` doesn't crash

* Updated code with feedback from @melekes, @ebuchman and @silasdavis.
* Added Makefile clause `release` to only run the test on seeing tag
`release` during releases i.e
```shell
make release
```
which will run the comprehensive and long integration-ish tests.

Fixes https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/issues/751.

Adds jitter to our exponential backoff to mitigate a self DDOS
vector. The jitter is a randomly picked percentage of a second
whose purpose is to ensure that each exponential backoff retry
occurs within (1<<attempts) == 2**attempts, but with the delay
each client will have a random buffer time before it tries to
reconnect instead of all at once reconnections that might even
bring back the previous conditions that might have caused the
dial to the WSServer to have failed e.g
* Network outage
* File descriptor exhaustion
* False positives from firewalls
etc

This cleans up some of the code in the state package

https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/pull/724#issuecomment-335362927

https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/pull/724#issuecomment-335316484

so they can be used in rpc/core/types/responses.go.

```
So, it seems like we could use the actual structs here, but we don't want to have to import consensus to get them, as then clients are importing too much crap. So probably we should move some types from consensus into consensus/types so we can import.

Will these raw messages be identical to:

type ResultDumpConsensusState struct {
  RoundState cstypes.RoundState
  PeerRoundStates map[string]cstypes.PeerRoundState
}
```
https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/pull/724#discussion_r143598193

Before:

```
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": "",
  "result": {
    "round_state": "RoundState{\n  H:10 R:0 S:RoundStepNewHeight\n  StartTime:     2017-10-09 13:07:24.841134374 +0400 +04\n  CommitTime:    2017-10-09 13:07:23.841134374 +0400 +04\n  Validators:    ValidatorSet{\n      Proposer: Validator{EF243CC0E9B88D0161D24D733BDE9003518CEA27 {PubKeyEd25519{2E0B9301334FCDAB193D514022F81BA09BBEC028685C96602BE9DD0BD4F9E202}} VP:10 A:0}\n      Validators:\n        Validator{EF243CC0E9B88D0161D24D733BDE9003518CEA27 {PubKeyEd25519{2E0B9301334FCDAB193D514022F81BA09BBEC028685C96602BE9DD0BD4F9E202}} VP:10 A:0}\n    }\n  Proposal:      \u003cnil\u003e\n  ProposalBlock: nil-PartSet nil-Block\n  LockedRound:   0\n  LockedBlock:   nil-PartSet nil-Block\n  Votes:         HeightVoteSet{H:10 R:0~0\n      VoteSet{H:10 R:0 T:1 +2/3:\u003cnil\u003e BA{1:_} map[]}\n      VoteSet{H:10 R:0 T:2 +2/3:\u003cnil\u003e BA{1:_} map[]}\n    }\n  LastCommit: VoteSet{H:9 R:0 T:2 +2/3:947F67A7B85439AF2CD5DFED376C51AC7BD67AEE:1:365E9983E466 BA{1:X} map[]}\n  LastValidators:    ValidatorSet{\n      Proposer: Validator{EF243CC0E9B88D0161D24D733BDE9003518CEA27 {PubKeyEd25519{2E0B9301334FCDAB193D514022F81BA09BBEC028685C96602BE9DD0BD4F9E202}} VP:10 A:0}\n      Validators:\n        Validator{EF243CC0E9B88D0161D24D733BDE9003518CEA27 {PubKeyEd25519{2E0B9301334FCDAB193D514022F81BA09BBEC028685C96602BE9DD0BD4F9E202}} VP:10 A:0}\n    }\n}",
    "peer_round_states": []
  }
}
```

After:

```
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": "",
  "result": {
    "round_state": {
      "Height": 1691,
      "Round": 0,
      "Step": 1,
      "StartTime": "2017-10-09T14:08:09.129491764+04:00",
      "CommitTime": "2017-10-09T14:08:08.129491764+04:00",
      "Validators": {
        "validators": [
          {
            "address": "EF243CC0E9B88D0161D24D733BDE9003518CEA27",
            "pub_key": {
              "type": "ed25519",
              "data": "2E0B9301334FCDAB193D514022F81BA09BBEC028685C96602BE9DD0BD4F9E202"
            },
            "voting_power": 10,
            "accum": 0
          }
        ],
        "proposer": {
          "address": "EF243CC0E9B88D0161D24D733BDE9003518CEA27",
          "pub_key": {
            "type": "ed25519",
            "data": "2E0B9301334FCDAB193D514022F81BA09BBEC028685C96602BE9DD0BD4F9E202"
          },
          "voting_power": 10,
          "accum": 0
        }
      },
      "Proposal": null,
      "ProposalBlock": null,
      "ProposalBlockParts": null,
      "LockedRound": 0,
      "LockedBlock": null,
      "LockedBlockParts": null,
      "Votes": {},
      "CommitRound": -1,
      "LastCommit": {},
      "LastValidators": {
        "validators": [
          {
            "address": "EF243CC0E9B88D0161D24D733BDE9003518CEA27",
            "pub_key": {
              "type": "ed25519",
              "data": "2E0B9301334FCDAB193D514022F81BA09BBEC028685C96602BE9DD0BD4F9E202"
            },
            "voting_power": 10,
            "accum": 0
          }
        ],
        "proposer": {
          "address": "EF243CC0E9B88D0161D24D733BDE9003518CEA27",
          "pub_key": {
            "type": "ed25519",
            "data": "2E0B9301334FCDAB193D514022F81BA09BBEC028685C96602BE9DD0BD4F9E202"
          },
          "voting_power": 10,
          "accum": 0
        }
      }
    },
    "peer_round_states": {
      "75EC8F15D244A421202F9725CD4DE509EE50303670310CF7530EF25E2B7C524B": {
        "Height": 1691,
        "Round": 0,
        "Step": 1,
        "StartTime": "2017-10-09T14:08:08.563251997+04:00",
        "Proposal": false,
        "ProposalBlockPartsHeader": {
          "total": 0,
          "hash": ""
        },
        "ProposalBlockParts": null,
        "ProposalPOLRound": -1,
        "ProposalPOL": null,
        "Prevotes": null,
        "Precommits": null,
        "LastCommitRound": 0,
        "LastCommit": null,
        "CatchupCommitRound": -1,
        "CatchupCommit": null
      }
    }
  }
}
```

I don't want to lose any documentation. Correct me if I am wrong, but we
don't have this docs anywhere else.

callback gives more power to the publisher. plus it is optional
comparing to a channel, which will block the whole client if you won't
read from it.

* rpc: subscribe on reconnection

* rpc: fix unit tests