You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
630 lines
24 KiB
630 lines
24 KiB
package evidence_test
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"bytes"
|
|
"context"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
|
dbm "github.com/tendermint/tm-db"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/crypto"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/crypto/tmhash"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/evidence"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/evidence/mocks"
|
|
sm "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/state"
|
|
smmocks "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/state/mocks"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/test/factory"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/log"
|
|
tmproto "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/proto/tendermint/types"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/types"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
defaultVotingPower = 10
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestVerifyLightClientAttack_Lunatic(t *testing.T) {
|
|
const (
|
|
height int64 = 10
|
|
commonHeight int64 = 4
|
|
totalVals = 10
|
|
byzVals = 4
|
|
)
|
|
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
|
|
defer cancel()
|
|
|
|
attackTime := defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1 * time.Hour)
|
|
// create valid lunatic evidence
|
|
ev, trusted, common := makeLunaticEvidence(ctx,
|
|
t, height, commonHeight, totalVals, byzVals, totalVals-byzVals, defaultEvidenceTime, attackTime)
|
|
require.NoError(t, ev.ValidateBasic())
|
|
|
|
// good pass -> no error
|
|
err := evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, common.SignedHeader, trusted.SignedHeader, common.ValidatorSet,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(2*time.Hour), 3*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// trusted and conflicting hashes are the same -> an error should be returned
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, common.SignedHeader, ev.ConflictingBlock.SignedHeader, common.ValidatorSet,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(2*time.Hour), 3*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// evidence with different total validator power should fail
|
|
ev.TotalVotingPower = 1 * defaultVotingPower
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, common.SignedHeader, trusted.SignedHeader, common.ValidatorSet,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(2*time.Hour), 3*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.Error(t, ev.ValidateABCI(common.ValidatorSet, trusted.SignedHeader, defaultEvidenceTime))
|
|
|
|
// evidence without enough malicious votes should fail
|
|
ev, trusted, common = makeLunaticEvidence(ctx,
|
|
t, height, commonHeight, totalVals, byzVals-1, totalVals-byzVals, defaultEvidenceTime, attackTime)
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, common.SignedHeader, trusted.SignedHeader, common.ValidatorSet,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(2*time.Hour), 3*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestVerify_LunaticAttackAgainstState(t *testing.T) {
|
|
const (
|
|
height int64 = 10
|
|
commonHeight int64 = 4
|
|
totalVals = 10
|
|
byzVals = 4
|
|
)
|
|
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
|
|
defer cancel()
|
|
|
|
attackTime := defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1 * time.Hour)
|
|
// create valid lunatic evidence
|
|
ev, trusted, common := makeLunaticEvidence(ctx,
|
|
t, height, commonHeight, totalVals, byzVals, totalVals-byzVals, defaultEvidenceTime, attackTime)
|
|
|
|
// now we try to test verification against state
|
|
state := sm.State{
|
|
LastBlockTime: defaultEvidenceTime.Add(2 * time.Hour),
|
|
LastBlockHeight: height + 1,
|
|
ConsensusParams: *types.DefaultConsensusParams(),
|
|
}
|
|
stateStore := &smmocks.Store{}
|
|
stateStore.On("LoadValidators", commonHeight).Return(common.ValidatorSet, nil)
|
|
stateStore.On("Load").Return(state, nil)
|
|
blockStore := &mocks.BlockStore{}
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", commonHeight).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: *common.Header})
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", height).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: *trusted.Header})
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockCommit", commonHeight).Return(common.Commit)
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockCommit", height).Return(trusted.Commit)
|
|
pool, err := evidence.NewPool(log.TestingLogger(), dbm.NewMemDB(), stateStore, blockStore)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
evList := types.EvidenceList{ev}
|
|
// check that the evidence pool correctly verifies the evidence
|
|
assert.NoError(t, pool.CheckEvidence(evList))
|
|
|
|
// as it was not originally in the pending bucket, it should now have been added
|
|
pendingEvs, _ := pool.PendingEvidence(state.ConsensusParams.Evidence.MaxBytes)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, len(pendingEvs))
|
|
assert.Equal(t, ev, pendingEvs[0])
|
|
|
|
// if we submit evidence only against a single byzantine validator when we see there are more validators then this
|
|
// should return an error
|
|
ev.ByzantineValidators = ev.ByzantineValidators[:1]
|
|
t.Log(evList)
|
|
assert.Error(t, pool.CheckEvidence(evList))
|
|
// restore original byz vals
|
|
ev.ByzantineValidators = ev.GetByzantineValidators(common.ValidatorSet, trusted.SignedHeader)
|
|
|
|
// duplicate evidence should be rejected
|
|
evList = types.EvidenceList{ev, ev}
|
|
pool, err = evidence.NewPool(log.TestingLogger(), dbm.NewMemDB(), stateStore, blockStore)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.Error(t, pool.CheckEvidence(evList))
|
|
|
|
// If evidence is submitted with an altered timestamp it should return an error
|
|
ev.Timestamp = defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1 * time.Minute)
|
|
pool, err = evidence.NewPool(log.TestingLogger(), dbm.NewMemDB(), stateStore, blockStore)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.Error(t, pool.AddEvidence(ev))
|
|
ev.Timestamp = defaultEvidenceTime
|
|
|
|
// Evidence submitted with a different validator power should fail
|
|
ev.TotalVotingPower = 1
|
|
pool, err = evidence.NewPool(log.TestingLogger(), dbm.NewMemDB(), stateStore, blockStore)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.Error(t, pool.AddEvidence(ev))
|
|
ev.TotalVotingPower = common.ValidatorSet.TotalVotingPower()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestVerify_ForwardLunaticAttack(t *testing.T) {
|
|
const (
|
|
nodeHeight int64 = 8
|
|
attackHeight int64 = 10
|
|
commonHeight int64 = 4
|
|
totalVals = 10
|
|
byzVals = 5
|
|
)
|
|
attackTime := defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1 * time.Hour)
|
|
|
|
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
|
|
defer cancel()
|
|
// create a forward lunatic attack
|
|
ev, trusted, common := makeLunaticEvidence(ctx,
|
|
t, attackHeight, commonHeight, totalVals, byzVals, totalVals-byzVals, defaultEvidenceTime, attackTime)
|
|
|
|
// now we try to test verification against state
|
|
state := sm.State{
|
|
LastBlockTime: defaultEvidenceTime.Add(2 * time.Hour),
|
|
LastBlockHeight: nodeHeight,
|
|
ConsensusParams: *types.DefaultConsensusParams(),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// modify trusted light block so that it is of a height less than the conflicting one
|
|
trusted.Header.Height = state.LastBlockHeight
|
|
trusted.Header.Time = state.LastBlockTime
|
|
|
|
stateStore := &smmocks.Store{}
|
|
stateStore.On("LoadValidators", commonHeight).Return(common.ValidatorSet, nil)
|
|
stateStore.On("Load").Return(state, nil)
|
|
blockStore := &mocks.BlockStore{}
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", commonHeight).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: *common.Header})
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", nodeHeight).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: *trusted.Header})
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", attackHeight).Return(nil)
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockCommit", commonHeight).Return(common.Commit)
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockCommit", nodeHeight).Return(trusted.Commit)
|
|
blockStore.On("Height").Return(nodeHeight)
|
|
pool, err := evidence.NewPool(log.TestingLogger(), dbm.NewMemDB(), stateStore, blockStore)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// check that the evidence pool correctly verifies the evidence
|
|
assert.NoError(t, pool.CheckEvidence(types.EvidenceList{ev}))
|
|
|
|
// now we use a time which isn't able to contradict the FLA - thus we can't verify the evidence
|
|
oldBlockStore := &mocks.BlockStore{}
|
|
oldHeader := trusted.Header
|
|
oldHeader.Time = defaultEvidenceTime
|
|
oldBlockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", commonHeight).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: *common.Header})
|
|
oldBlockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", nodeHeight).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: *oldHeader})
|
|
oldBlockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", attackHeight).Return(nil)
|
|
oldBlockStore.On("LoadBlockCommit", commonHeight).Return(common.Commit)
|
|
oldBlockStore.On("LoadBlockCommit", nodeHeight).Return(trusted.Commit)
|
|
oldBlockStore.On("Height").Return(nodeHeight)
|
|
require.Equal(t, defaultEvidenceTime, oldBlockStore.LoadBlockMeta(nodeHeight).Header.Time)
|
|
|
|
pool, err = evidence.NewPool(log.TestingLogger(), dbm.NewMemDB(), stateStore, oldBlockStore)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.Error(t, pool.CheckEvidence(types.EvidenceList{ev}))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestVerifyLightClientAttack_Equivocation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
|
|
defer cancel()
|
|
|
|
conflictingVals, conflictingPrivVals := factory.RandValidatorSet(ctx, 5, 10)
|
|
|
|
conflictingHeader, err := factory.MakeHeader(&types.Header{
|
|
ChainID: evidenceChainID,
|
|
Height: 10,
|
|
Time: defaultEvidenceTime,
|
|
ValidatorsHash: conflictingVals.Hash(),
|
|
})
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
trustedHeader, _ := factory.MakeHeader(&types.Header{
|
|
ChainID: evidenceChainID,
|
|
Height: 10,
|
|
Time: defaultEvidenceTime,
|
|
ValidatorsHash: conflictingHeader.ValidatorsHash,
|
|
NextValidatorsHash: conflictingHeader.NextValidatorsHash,
|
|
ConsensusHash: conflictingHeader.ConsensusHash,
|
|
AppHash: conflictingHeader.AppHash,
|
|
LastResultsHash: conflictingHeader.LastResultsHash,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// we are simulating a duplicate vote attack where all the validators in the conflictingVals set
|
|
// except the last validator vote twice
|
|
blockID := factory.MakeBlockIDWithHash(conflictingHeader.Hash())
|
|
voteSet := types.NewVoteSet(evidenceChainID, 10, 1, tmproto.SignedMsgType(2), conflictingVals)
|
|
commit, err := factory.MakeCommit(ctx, blockID, 10, 1, voteSet, conflictingPrivVals[:4], defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
ev := &types.LightClientAttackEvidence{
|
|
ConflictingBlock: &types.LightBlock{
|
|
SignedHeader: &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: conflictingHeader,
|
|
Commit: commit,
|
|
},
|
|
ValidatorSet: conflictingVals,
|
|
},
|
|
CommonHeight: 10,
|
|
ByzantineValidators: conflictingVals.Validators[:4],
|
|
TotalVotingPower: 50,
|
|
Timestamp: defaultEvidenceTime,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
trustedBlockID := makeBlockID(trustedHeader.Hash(), 1000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
trustedVoteSet := types.NewVoteSet(evidenceChainID, 10, 1, tmproto.SignedMsgType(2), conflictingVals)
|
|
trustedCommit, err := factory.MakeCommit(ctx, trustedBlockID, 10, 1,
|
|
trustedVoteSet, conflictingPrivVals, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
trustedSignedHeader := &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: trustedHeader,
|
|
Commit: trustedCommit,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// good pass -> no error
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, trustedSignedHeader, trustedSignedHeader, conflictingVals,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1*time.Minute), 2*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// trusted and conflicting hashes are the same -> an error should be returned
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, trustedSignedHeader, ev.ConflictingBlock.SignedHeader, conflictingVals,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1*time.Minute), 2*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// conflicting header has different next validators hash which should have been correctly derived from
|
|
// the previous round
|
|
ev.ConflictingBlock.Header.NextValidatorsHash = crypto.CRandBytes(tmhash.Size)
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, trustedSignedHeader, trustedSignedHeader, nil,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1*time.Minute), 2*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
// revert next validators hash
|
|
ev.ConflictingBlock.Header.NextValidatorsHash = trustedHeader.NextValidatorsHash
|
|
|
|
state := sm.State{
|
|
LastBlockTime: defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1 * time.Minute),
|
|
LastBlockHeight: 11,
|
|
ConsensusParams: *types.DefaultConsensusParams(),
|
|
}
|
|
stateStore := &smmocks.Store{}
|
|
stateStore.On("LoadValidators", int64(10)).Return(conflictingVals, nil)
|
|
stateStore.On("Load").Return(state, nil)
|
|
blockStore := &mocks.BlockStore{}
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", int64(10)).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: *trustedHeader})
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockCommit", int64(10)).Return(trustedCommit)
|
|
|
|
pool, err := evidence.NewPool(log.TestingLogger(), dbm.NewMemDB(), stateStore, blockStore)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
evList := types.EvidenceList{ev}
|
|
err = pool.CheckEvidence(evList)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
pendingEvs, _ := pool.PendingEvidence(state.ConsensusParams.Evidence.MaxBytes)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, len(pendingEvs))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestVerifyLightClientAttack_Amnesia(t *testing.T) {
|
|
var height int64 = 10
|
|
|
|
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
|
|
defer cancel()
|
|
|
|
conflictingVals, conflictingPrivVals := factory.RandValidatorSet(ctx, 5, 10)
|
|
|
|
conflictingHeader, err := factory.MakeHeader(&types.Header{
|
|
ChainID: evidenceChainID,
|
|
Height: height,
|
|
Time: defaultEvidenceTime,
|
|
ValidatorsHash: conflictingVals.Hash(),
|
|
})
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
trustedHeader, _ := factory.MakeHeader(&types.Header{
|
|
ChainID: evidenceChainID,
|
|
Height: height,
|
|
Time: defaultEvidenceTime,
|
|
ValidatorsHash: conflictingHeader.ValidatorsHash,
|
|
NextValidatorsHash: conflictingHeader.NextValidatorsHash,
|
|
ConsensusHash: conflictingHeader.ConsensusHash,
|
|
AppHash: conflictingHeader.AppHash,
|
|
LastResultsHash: conflictingHeader.LastResultsHash,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// we are simulating an amnesia attack where all the validators in the conflictingVals set
|
|
// except the last validator vote twice. However this time the commits are of different rounds.
|
|
blockID := makeBlockID(conflictingHeader.Hash(), 1000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
voteSet := types.NewVoteSet(evidenceChainID, height, 0, tmproto.SignedMsgType(2), conflictingVals)
|
|
commit, err := factory.MakeCommit(ctx, blockID, height, 0, voteSet, conflictingPrivVals, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
ev := &types.LightClientAttackEvidence{
|
|
ConflictingBlock: &types.LightBlock{
|
|
SignedHeader: &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: conflictingHeader,
|
|
Commit: commit,
|
|
},
|
|
ValidatorSet: conflictingVals,
|
|
},
|
|
CommonHeight: height,
|
|
ByzantineValidators: nil, // with amnesia evidence no validators are submitted as abci evidence
|
|
TotalVotingPower: 50,
|
|
Timestamp: defaultEvidenceTime,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
trustedBlockID := makeBlockID(trustedHeader.Hash(), 1000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
trustedVoteSet := types.NewVoteSet(evidenceChainID, height, 1, tmproto.SignedMsgType(2), conflictingVals)
|
|
trustedCommit, err := factory.MakeCommit(ctx, trustedBlockID, height, 1,
|
|
trustedVoteSet, conflictingPrivVals, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
trustedSignedHeader := &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: trustedHeader,
|
|
Commit: trustedCommit,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// good pass -> no error
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, trustedSignedHeader, trustedSignedHeader, conflictingVals,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1*time.Minute), 2*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// trusted and conflicting hashes are the same -> an error should be returned
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, trustedSignedHeader, ev.ConflictingBlock.SignedHeader, conflictingVals,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1*time.Minute), 2*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
state := sm.State{
|
|
LastBlockTime: defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1 * time.Minute),
|
|
LastBlockHeight: 11,
|
|
ConsensusParams: *types.DefaultConsensusParams(),
|
|
}
|
|
stateStore := &smmocks.Store{}
|
|
stateStore.On("LoadValidators", int64(10)).Return(conflictingVals, nil)
|
|
stateStore.On("Load").Return(state, nil)
|
|
blockStore := &mocks.BlockStore{}
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", int64(10)).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: *trustedHeader})
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockCommit", int64(10)).Return(trustedCommit)
|
|
|
|
pool, err := evidence.NewPool(log.TestingLogger(), dbm.NewMemDB(), stateStore, blockStore)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
evList := types.EvidenceList{ev}
|
|
err = pool.CheckEvidence(evList)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
pendingEvs, _ := pool.PendingEvidence(state.ConsensusParams.Evidence.MaxBytes)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, len(pendingEvs))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type voteData struct {
|
|
vote1 *types.Vote
|
|
vote2 *types.Vote
|
|
valid bool
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestVerifyDuplicateVoteEvidence(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
|
|
defer cancel()
|
|
|
|
val := types.NewMockPV()
|
|
val2 := types.NewMockPV()
|
|
valSet := types.NewValidatorSet([]*types.Validator{val.ExtractIntoValidator(ctx, 1)})
|
|
|
|
blockID := makeBlockID([]byte("blockhash"), 1000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
blockID2 := makeBlockID([]byte("blockhash2"), 1000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
blockID3 := makeBlockID([]byte("blockhash"), 10000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
blockID4 := makeBlockID([]byte("blockhash"), 10000, []byte("partshash2"))
|
|
|
|
const chainID = "mychain"
|
|
|
|
vote1 := makeVote(ctx, t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
v1 := vote1.ToProto()
|
|
err := val.SignVote(ctx, chainID, v1)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
badVote := makeVote(ctx, t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
bv := badVote.ToProto()
|
|
err = val2.SignVote(ctx, chainID, bv)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
vote1.Signature = v1.Signature
|
|
badVote.Signature = bv.Signature
|
|
|
|
cases := []voteData{
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(ctx, t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID2, defaultEvidenceTime), true}, // different block ids
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(ctx, t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID3, defaultEvidenceTime), true},
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(ctx, t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID4, defaultEvidenceTime), true},
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(ctx, t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID, defaultEvidenceTime), false}, // wrong block id
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(ctx, t, val, "mychain2", 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID2, defaultEvidenceTime), false}, // wrong chain id
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(ctx, t, val, chainID, 0, 11, 2, 1, blockID2, defaultEvidenceTime), false}, // wrong height
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(ctx, t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 3, 1, blockID2, defaultEvidenceTime), false}, // wrong round
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(ctx, t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 2, blockID2, defaultEvidenceTime), false}, // wrong step
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(ctx, t, val2, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID2, defaultEvidenceTime), false}, // wrong validator
|
|
// a different vote time doesn't matter
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(ctx, t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID2, time.Date(2020, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)), true},
|
|
{vote1, badVote, false}, // signed by wrong key
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
ev := &types.DuplicateVoteEvidence{
|
|
VoteA: c.vote1,
|
|
VoteB: c.vote2,
|
|
ValidatorPower: 1,
|
|
TotalVotingPower: 1,
|
|
Timestamp: defaultEvidenceTime,
|
|
}
|
|
if c.valid {
|
|
assert.Nil(t, evidence.VerifyDuplicateVote(ev, chainID, valSet), "evidence should be valid")
|
|
} else {
|
|
assert.NotNil(t, evidence.VerifyDuplicateVote(ev, chainID, valSet), "evidence should be invalid")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// create good evidence and correct validator power
|
|
goodEv, err := types.NewMockDuplicateVoteEvidenceWithValidator(ctx, 10, defaultEvidenceTime, val, chainID)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
goodEv.ValidatorPower = 1
|
|
goodEv.TotalVotingPower = 1
|
|
badEv, err := types.NewMockDuplicateVoteEvidenceWithValidator(ctx, 10, defaultEvidenceTime, val, chainID)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
badTimeEv, err := types.NewMockDuplicateVoteEvidenceWithValidator(ctx, 10, defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1*time.Minute), val, chainID)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
badTimeEv.ValidatorPower = 1
|
|
badTimeEv.TotalVotingPower = 1
|
|
state := sm.State{
|
|
ChainID: chainID,
|
|
LastBlockTime: defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1 * time.Minute),
|
|
LastBlockHeight: 11,
|
|
ConsensusParams: *types.DefaultConsensusParams(),
|
|
}
|
|
stateStore := &smmocks.Store{}
|
|
stateStore.On("LoadValidators", int64(10)).Return(valSet, nil)
|
|
stateStore.On("Load").Return(state, nil)
|
|
blockStore := &mocks.BlockStore{}
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", int64(10)).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: types.Header{Time: defaultEvidenceTime}})
|
|
|
|
pool, err := evidence.NewPool(log.TestingLogger(), dbm.NewMemDB(), stateStore, blockStore)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
evList := types.EvidenceList{goodEv}
|
|
err = pool.CheckEvidence(evList)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// evidence with a different validator power should fail
|
|
evList = types.EvidenceList{badEv}
|
|
err = pool.CheckEvidence(evList)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// evidence with a different timestamp should fail
|
|
evList = types.EvidenceList{badTimeEv}
|
|
err = pool.CheckEvidence(evList)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func makeLunaticEvidence(
|
|
ctx context.Context,
|
|
t *testing.T,
|
|
height, commonHeight int64,
|
|
totalVals, byzVals, phantomVals int,
|
|
commonTime, attackTime time.Time,
|
|
) (ev *types.LightClientAttackEvidence, trusted *types.LightBlock, common *types.LightBlock) {
|
|
commonValSet, commonPrivVals := factory.RandValidatorSet(ctx, totalVals, defaultVotingPower)
|
|
|
|
require.Greater(t, totalVals, byzVals)
|
|
|
|
// extract out the subset of byzantine validators in the common validator set
|
|
byzValSet, byzPrivVals := commonValSet.Validators[:byzVals], commonPrivVals[:byzVals]
|
|
|
|
phantomValSet, phantomPrivVals := factory.RandValidatorSet(ctx, phantomVals, defaultVotingPower)
|
|
|
|
conflictingVals := phantomValSet.Copy()
|
|
require.NoError(t, conflictingVals.UpdateWithChangeSet(byzValSet))
|
|
conflictingPrivVals := append(phantomPrivVals, byzPrivVals...)
|
|
|
|
conflictingPrivVals = orderPrivValsByValSet(ctx, t, conflictingVals, conflictingPrivVals)
|
|
|
|
commonHeader, err := factory.MakeHeader(&types.Header{
|
|
ChainID: evidenceChainID,
|
|
Height: commonHeight,
|
|
Time: commonTime,
|
|
})
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
trustedHeader, err := factory.MakeHeader(&types.Header{
|
|
ChainID: evidenceChainID,
|
|
Height: height,
|
|
Time: defaultEvidenceTime,
|
|
})
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
conflictingHeader, err := factory.MakeHeader(&types.Header{
|
|
ChainID: evidenceChainID,
|
|
Height: height,
|
|
Time: attackTime,
|
|
ValidatorsHash: conflictingVals.Hash(),
|
|
})
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
blockID := factory.MakeBlockIDWithHash(conflictingHeader.Hash())
|
|
voteSet := types.NewVoteSet(evidenceChainID, height, 1, tmproto.SignedMsgType(2), conflictingVals)
|
|
commit, err := factory.MakeCommit(ctx, blockID, height, 1, voteSet, conflictingPrivVals, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
ev = &types.LightClientAttackEvidence{
|
|
ConflictingBlock: &types.LightBlock{
|
|
SignedHeader: &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: conflictingHeader,
|
|
Commit: commit,
|
|
},
|
|
ValidatorSet: conflictingVals,
|
|
},
|
|
CommonHeight: commonHeight,
|
|
TotalVotingPower: commonValSet.TotalVotingPower(),
|
|
ByzantineValidators: byzValSet,
|
|
Timestamp: commonTime,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
common = &types.LightBlock{
|
|
SignedHeader: &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: commonHeader,
|
|
// we can leave this empty because we shouldn't be checking this
|
|
Commit: &types.Commit{},
|
|
},
|
|
ValidatorSet: commonValSet,
|
|
}
|
|
trustedBlockID := factory.MakeBlockIDWithHash(trustedHeader.Hash())
|
|
trustedVals, privVals := factory.RandValidatorSet(ctx, totalVals, defaultVotingPower)
|
|
trustedVoteSet := types.NewVoteSet(evidenceChainID, height, 1, tmproto.SignedMsgType(2), trustedVals)
|
|
trustedCommit, err := factory.MakeCommit(ctx, trustedBlockID, height, 1, trustedVoteSet, privVals, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
trusted = &types.LightBlock{
|
|
SignedHeader: &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: trustedHeader,
|
|
Commit: trustedCommit,
|
|
},
|
|
ValidatorSet: trustedVals,
|
|
}
|
|
return ev, trusted, common
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func makeVote(
|
|
ctx context.Context,
|
|
t *testing.T, val types.PrivValidator, chainID string, valIndex int32, height int64,
|
|
round int32, step int, blockID types.BlockID, time time.Time,
|
|
) *types.Vote {
|
|
pubKey, err := val.GetPubKey(ctx)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
v := &types.Vote{
|
|
ValidatorAddress: pubKey.Address(),
|
|
ValidatorIndex: valIndex,
|
|
Height: height,
|
|
Round: round,
|
|
Type: tmproto.SignedMsgType(step),
|
|
BlockID: blockID,
|
|
Timestamp: time,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
vpb := v.ToProto()
|
|
err = val.SignVote(ctx, chainID, vpb)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
v.Signature = vpb.Signature
|
|
return v
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func makeBlockID(hash []byte, partSetSize uint32, partSetHash []byte) types.BlockID {
|
|
var (
|
|
h = make([]byte, tmhash.Size)
|
|
psH = make([]byte, tmhash.Size)
|
|
)
|
|
copy(h, hash)
|
|
copy(psH, partSetHash)
|
|
return types.BlockID{
|
|
Hash: h,
|
|
PartSetHeader: types.PartSetHeader{
|
|
Total: partSetSize,
|
|
Hash: psH,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func orderPrivValsByValSet(ctx context.Context, t *testing.T, vals *types.ValidatorSet, privVals []types.PrivValidator) []types.PrivValidator {
|
|
output := make([]types.PrivValidator, len(privVals))
|
|
for idx, v := range vals.Validators {
|
|
for _, p := range privVals {
|
|
pubKey, err := p.GetPubKey(ctx)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
if bytes.Equal(v.Address, pubKey.Address()) {
|
|
output[idx] = p
|
|
break
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
require.NotEmpty(t, output[idx])
|
|
}
|
|
return output
|
|
}
|