order |
---|
12 |
Currently, there's no ordering of transactions other than the order they've arrived (via RPC or from other nodes).
So the only way to specify the order is to send them to a single node.
valA:
tx1
tx2
tx3
If the transactions are split up across different nodes, there's no way to ensure they are processed in the expected order.
valA:
tx1
tx2
valB:
tx3
If valB is the proposer, the order might be:
tx3
tx1
tx2
If valA is the proposer, the order might be:
tx1
tx2
tx3
That said, if the transactions contain some internal value, like an
order/nonce/sequence number, the application can reject transactions that are
out of order. So if a node receives tx3
, then tx1
, it can reject tx3
and then
accept tx1
. The sender can then retry sending tx3
, which should probably be
rejected until the node has seen tx2
.