|
package evidence_test
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
|
|
|
dbm "github.com/tendermint/tm-db"
|
|
|
|
abci "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/abci/types"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/crypto"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/crypto/tmhash"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/evidence"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/evidence/mocks"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/log"
|
|
tmproto "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/proto/tendermint/types"
|
|
tmversion "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/proto/tendermint/version"
|
|
sm "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/state"
|
|
smmocks "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/state/mocks"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/types"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/version"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestVerifyLightClientAttack_Lunatic(t *testing.T) {
|
|
commonVals, commonPrivVals := types.RandValidatorSet(2, 10)
|
|
|
|
newVal, newPrivVal := types.RandValidator(false, 9)
|
|
|
|
conflictingVals, err := types.ValidatorSetFromExistingValidators(append(commonVals.Validators, newVal))
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
conflictingPrivVals := append(commonPrivVals, newPrivVal)
|
|
|
|
commonHeader := makeHeaderRandom(4)
|
|
commonHeader.Time = defaultEvidenceTime.Add(-1 * time.Hour)
|
|
trustedHeader := makeHeaderRandom(10)
|
|
|
|
conflictingHeader := makeHeaderRandom(10)
|
|
conflictingHeader.ValidatorsHash = conflictingVals.Hash()
|
|
|
|
// we are simulating a duplicate vote attack where all the validators in the conflictingVals set
|
|
// vote twice
|
|
blockID := makeBlockID(conflictingHeader.Hash(), 1000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
voteSet := types.NewVoteSet(evidenceChainID, 10, 1, tmproto.SignedMsgType(2), conflictingVals)
|
|
commit, err := types.MakeCommit(blockID, 10, 1, voteSet, conflictingPrivVals, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
ev := &types.LightClientAttackEvidence{
|
|
ConflictingBlock: &types.LightBlock{
|
|
SignedHeader: &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: conflictingHeader,
|
|
Commit: commit,
|
|
},
|
|
ValidatorSet: conflictingVals,
|
|
},
|
|
CommonHeight: 4,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
commonSignedHeader := &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: commonHeader,
|
|
Commit: &types.Commit{},
|
|
}
|
|
trustedBlockID := makeBlockID(trustedHeader.Hash(), 1000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
vals, privVals := types.RandValidatorSet(3, 8)
|
|
trustedVoteSet := types.NewVoteSet(evidenceChainID, 10, 1, tmproto.SignedMsgType(2), vals)
|
|
trustedCommit, err := types.MakeCommit(trustedBlockID, 10, 1, trustedVoteSet, privVals, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
trustedSignedHeader := &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: trustedHeader,
|
|
Commit: trustedCommit,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// good pass -> no error
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, commonSignedHeader, trustedSignedHeader, commonVals,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1*time.Minute), 2*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// trusted and conflicting hashes are the same -> an error should be returned
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, commonSignedHeader, ev.ConflictingBlock.SignedHeader, commonVals,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1*time.Minute), 2*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
state := sm.State{
|
|
LastBlockTime: defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1 * time.Minute),
|
|
LastBlockHeight: 11,
|
|
ConsensusParams: *types.DefaultConsensusParams(),
|
|
}
|
|
stateStore := &smmocks.Store{}
|
|
stateStore.On("LoadValidators", int64(4)).Return(commonVals, nil)
|
|
stateStore.On("Load").Return(state, nil)
|
|
blockStore := &mocks.BlockStore{}
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", int64(4)).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: *commonHeader})
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", int64(10)).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: *trustedHeader})
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockCommit", int64(4)).Return(commit)
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockCommit", int64(10)).Return(trustedCommit)
|
|
|
|
pool, err := evidence.NewPool(dbm.NewMemDB(), stateStore, blockStore)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
pool.SetLogger(log.TestingLogger())
|
|
|
|
evList := types.EvidenceList{ev}
|
|
err = pool.CheckEvidence(evList)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
pendingEvs := pool.PendingEvidence(2)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, len(pendingEvs))
|
|
|
|
pubKey, err := newPrivVal.GetPubKey()
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
lastCommit := makeCommit(state.LastBlockHeight, pubKey.Address())
|
|
block := types.MakeBlock(state.LastBlockHeight, []types.Tx{}, lastCommit, []types.Evidence{ev})
|
|
|
|
abciEv := pool.ABCIEvidence(block.Height, block.Evidence.Evidence)
|
|
expectedAbciEv := make([]abci.Evidence, len(commonVals.Validators))
|
|
|
|
// we expect evidence to be made for all validators in the common validator set
|
|
for idx, val := range commonVals.Validators {
|
|
ev := abci.Evidence{
|
|
Type: abci.EvidenceType_LIGHT_CLIENT_ATTACK,
|
|
Validator: types.TM2PB.Validator(val),
|
|
Height: commonHeader.Height,
|
|
Time: commonHeader.Time,
|
|
TotalVotingPower: commonVals.TotalVotingPower(),
|
|
}
|
|
expectedAbciEv[idx] = ev
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, expectedAbciEv, abciEv)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestVerifyLightClientAttack_Equivocation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
conflictingVals, conflictingPrivVals := types.RandValidatorSet(5, 10)
|
|
trustedHeader := makeHeaderRandom(10)
|
|
|
|
conflictingHeader := makeHeaderRandom(10)
|
|
conflictingHeader.ValidatorsHash = conflictingVals.Hash()
|
|
|
|
trustedHeader.ValidatorsHash = conflictingHeader.ValidatorsHash
|
|
trustedHeader.NextValidatorsHash = conflictingHeader.NextValidatorsHash
|
|
trustedHeader.ConsensusHash = conflictingHeader.ConsensusHash
|
|
trustedHeader.AppHash = conflictingHeader.AppHash
|
|
trustedHeader.LastResultsHash = conflictingHeader.LastResultsHash
|
|
|
|
// we are simulating a duplicate vote attack where all the validators in the conflictingVals set
|
|
// except the last validator vote twice
|
|
blockID := makeBlockID(conflictingHeader.Hash(), 1000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
voteSet := types.NewVoteSet(evidenceChainID, 10, 1, tmproto.SignedMsgType(2), conflictingVals)
|
|
commit, err := types.MakeCommit(blockID, 10, 1, voteSet, conflictingPrivVals[:4], defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
ev := &types.LightClientAttackEvidence{
|
|
ConflictingBlock: &types.LightBlock{
|
|
SignedHeader: &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: conflictingHeader,
|
|
Commit: commit,
|
|
},
|
|
ValidatorSet: conflictingVals,
|
|
},
|
|
CommonHeight: 10,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
trustedBlockID := makeBlockID(trustedHeader.Hash(), 1000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
trustedVoteSet := types.NewVoteSet(evidenceChainID, 10, 1, tmproto.SignedMsgType(2), conflictingVals)
|
|
trustedCommit, err := types.MakeCommit(trustedBlockID, 10, 1, trustedVoteSet, conflictingPrivVals, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
trustedSignedHeader := &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: trustedHeader,
|
|
Commit: trustedCommit,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// good pass -> no error
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, trustedSignedHeader, trustedSignedHeader, nil,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1*time.Minute), 2*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// trusted and conflicting hashes are the same -> an error should be returned
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, trustedSignedHeader, ev.ConflictingBlock.SignedHeader, nil,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1*time.Minute), 2*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// conflicting header has different next validators hash which should have been correctly derived from
|
|
// the previous round
|
|
ev.ConflictingBlock.Header.NextValidatorsHash = crypto.CRandBytes(tmhash.Size)
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, trustedSignedHeader, trustedSignedHeader, nil,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1*time.Minute), 2*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
// revert next validators hash
|
|
ev.ConflictingBlock.Header.NextValidatorsHash = trustedHeader.NextValidatorsHash
|
|
|
|
state := sm.State{
|
|
LastBlockTime: defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1 * time.Minute),
|
|
LastBlockHeight: 11,
|
|
ConsensusParams: *types.DefaultConsensusParams(),
|
|
}
|
|
stateStore := &smmocks.Store{}
|
|
stateStore.On("LoadValidators", int64(10)).Return(conflictingVals, nil)
|
|
stateStore.On("Load").Return(state, nil)
|
|
blockStore := &mocks.BlockStore{}
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", int64(10)).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: *trustedHeader})
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockCommit", int64(10)).Return(trustedCommit)
|
|
|
|
pool, err := evidence.NewPool(dbm.NewMemDB(), stateStore, blockStore)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
pool.SetLogger(log.TestingLogger())
|
|
|
|
evList := types.EvidenceList{ev}
|
|
err = pool.CheckEvidence(evList)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
pendingEvs := pool.PendingEvidence(2)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, len(pendingEvs))
|
|
|
|
pubKey, err := conflictingPrivVals[0].GetPubKey()
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
lastCommit := makeCommit(state.LastBlockHeight, pubKey.Address())
|
|
block := types.MakeBlock(state.LastBlockHeight, []types.Tx{}, lastCommit, []types.Evidence{ev})
|
|
|
|
abciEv := pool.ABCIEvidence(block.Height, block.Evidence.Evidence)
|
|
expectedAbciEv := make([]abci.Evidence, len(conflictingVals.Validators)-1)
|
|
|
|
// we expect evidence to be made for all validators except the last one
|
|
for idx, val := range conflictingVals.Validators {
|
|
if idx == 4 { // skip the last validator
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
ev := abci.Evidence{
|
|
Type: abci.EvidenceType_LIGHT_CLIENT_ATTACK,
|
|
Validator: types.TM2PB.Validator(val),
|
|
Height: ev.ConflictingBlock.Height,
|
|
Time: ev.ConflictingBlock.Time,
|
|
TotalVotingPower: ev.ConflictingBlock.ValidatorSet.TotalVotingPower(),
|
|
}
|
|
expectedAbciEv[idx] = ev
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, expectedAbciEv, abciEv)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestVerifyLightClientAttack_Amnesia(t *testing.T) {
|
|
conflictingVals, conflictingPrivVals := types.RandValidatorSet(5, 10)
|
|
|
|
conflictingHeader := makeHeaderRandom(10)
|
|
conflictingHeader.ValidatorsHash = conflictingVals.Hash()
|
|
trustedHeader := makeHeaderRandom(10)
|
|
trustedHeader.ValidatorsHash = conflictingHeader.ValidatorsHash
|
|
trustedHeader.NextValidatorsHash = conflictingHeader.NextValidatorsHash
|
|
trustedHeader.AppHash = conflictingHeader.AppHash
|
|
trustedHeader.ConsensusHash = conflictingHeader.ConsensusHash
|
|
trustedHeader.LastResultsHash = conflictingHeader.LastResultsHash
|
|
|
|
// we are simulating an amnesia attack where all the validators in the conflictingVals set
|
|
// except the last validator vote twice. However this time the commits are of different rounds.
|
|
blockID := makeBlockID(conflictingHeader.Hash(), 1000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
voteSet := types.NewVoteSet(evidenceChainID, 10, 0, tmproto.SignedMsgType(2), conflictingVals)
|
|
commit, err := types.MakeCommit(blockID, 10, 0, voteSet, conflictingPrivVals, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
ev := &types.LightClientAttackEvidence{
|
|
ConflictingBlock: &types.LightBlock{
|
|
SignedHeader: &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: conflictingHeader,
|
|
Commit: commit,
|
|
},
|
|
ValidatorSet: conflictingVals,
|
|
},
|
|
CommonHeight: 10,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
trustedBlockID := makeBlockID(trustedHeader.Hash(), 1000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
trustedVoteSet := types.NewVoteSet(evidenceChainID, 10, 1, tmproto.SignedMsgType(2), conflictingVals)
|
|
trustedCommit, err := types.MakeCommit(trustedBlockID, 10, 1, trustedVoteSet, conflictingPrivVals, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
trustedSignedHeader := &types.SignedHeader{
|
|
Header: trustedHeader,
|
|
Commit: trustedCommit,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// good pass -> no error
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, trustedSignedHeader, trustedSignedHeader, nil,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1*time.Minute), 2*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// trusted and conflicting hashes are the same -> an error should be returned
|
|
err = evidence.VerifyLightClientAttack(ev, trustedSignedHeader, ev.ConflictingBlock.SignedHeader, nil,
|
|
defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1*time.Minute), 2*time.Hour)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
state := sm.State{
|
|
LastBlockTime: defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1 * time.Minute),
|
|
LastBlockHeight: 11,
|
|
ConsensusParams: *types.DefaultConsensusParams(),
|
|
}
|
|
stateStore := &smmocks.Store{}
|
|
stateStore.On("LoadValidators", int64(10)).Return(conflictingVals, nil)
|
|
stateStore.On("Load").Return(state, nil)
|
|
blockStore := &mocks.BlockStore{}
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", int64(10)).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: *trustedHeader})
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockCommit", int64(10)).Return(trustedCommit)
|
|
|
|
pool, err := evidence.NewPool(dbm.NewMemDB(), stateStore, blockStore)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
pool.SetLogger(log.TestingLogger())
|
|
|
|
evList := types.EvidenceList{ev}
|
|
err = pool.CheckEvidence(evList)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
pendingEvs := pool.PendingEvidence(2)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 1, len(pendingEvs))
|
|
|
|
pubKey, err := conflictingPrivVals[0].GetPubKey()
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
lastCommit := makeCommit(state.LastBlockHeight, pubKey.Address())
|
|
block := types.MakeBlock(state.LastBlockHeight, []types.Tx{}, lastCommit, []types.Evidence{ev})
|
|
|
|
abciEv := pool.ABCIEvidence(block.Height, block.Evidence.Evidence)
|
|
// as we are unable to find out which subset of validators in the commit were malicious, no information
|
|
// is sent to the application. We expect the array to be empty
|
|
emptyEvidenceBlock := types.MakeBlock(state.LastBlockHeight, []types.Tx{}, lastCommit, []types.Evidence{})
|
|
expectedAbciEv := pool.ABCIEvidence(emptyEvidenceBlock.Height, emptyEvidenceBlock.Evidence.Evidence)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, expectedAbciEv, abciEv)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type voteData struct {
|
|
vote1 *types.Vote
|
|
vote2 *types.Vote
|
|
valid bool
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestVerifyDuplicateVoteEvidence(t *testing.T) {
|
|
val := types.NewMockPV()
|
|
val2 := types.NewMockPV()
|
|
valSet := types.NewValidatorSet([]*types.Validator{val.ExtractIntoValidator(1)})
|
|
|
|
blockID := makeBlockID([]byte("blockhash"), 1000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
blockID2 := makeBlockID([]byte("blockhash2"), 1000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
blockID3 := makeBlockID([]byte("blockhash"), 10000, []byte("partshash"))
|
|
blockID4 := makeBlockID([]byte("blockhash"), 10000, []byte("partshash2"))
|
|
|
|
const chainID = "mychain"
|
|
|
|
vote1 := makeVote(t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
v1 := vote1.ToProto()
|
|
err := val.SignVote(chainID, v1)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
badVote := makeVote(t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID, defaultEvidenceTime)
|
|
bv := badVote.ToProto()
|
|
err = val2.SignVote(chainID, bv)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
vote1.Signature = v1.Signature
|
|
badVote.Signature = bv.Signature
|
|
|
|
cases := []voteData{
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID2, defaultEvidenceTime), true}, // different block ids
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID3, defaultEvidenceTime), true},
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID4, defaultEvidenceTime), true},
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID, defaultEvidenceTime), false}, // wrong block id
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(t, val, "mychain2", 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID2, defaultEvidenceTime), false}, // wrong chain id
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(t, val, chainID, 0, 11, 2, 1, blockID2, defaultEvidenceTime), false}, // wrong height
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 3, 1, blockID2, defaultEvidenceTime), false}, // wrong round
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 2, blockID2, defaultEvidenceTime), false}, // wrong step
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(t, val2, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID2, defaultEvidenceTime), false}, // wrong validator
|
|
// a different vote time doesn't matter
|
|
{vote1, makeVote(t, val, chainID, 0, 10, 2, 1, blockID2, time.Date(2020, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)), true},
|
|
{vote1, badVote, false}, // signed by wrong key
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
ev := &types.DuplicateVoteEvidence{
|
|
VoteA: c.vote1,
|
|
VoteB: c.vote2,
|
|
}
|
|
if c.valid {
|
|
assert.Nil(t, evidence.VerifyDuplicateVote(ev, chainID, valSet), "evidence should be valid")
|
|
} else {
|
|
assert.NotNil(t, evidence.VerifyDuplicateVote(ev, chainID, valSet), "evidence should be invalid")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
goodEv := types.NewMockDuplicateVoteEvidenceWithValidator(10, defaultEvidenceTime, val, chainID)
|
|
state := sm.State{
|
|
ChainID: chainID,
|
|
LastBlockTime: defaultEvidenceTime.Add(1 * time.Minute),
|
|
LastBlockHeight: 11,
|
|
ConsensusParams: *types.DefaultConsensusParams(),
|
|
}
|
|
stateStore := &smmocks.Store{}
|
|
stateStore.On("LoadValidators", int64(10)).Return(valSet, nil)
|
|
stateStore.On("Load").Return(state, nil)
|
|
blockStore := &mocks.BlockStore{}
|
|
blockStore.On("LoadBlockMeta", int64(10)).Return(&types.BlockMeta{Header: types.Header{Time: defaultEvidenceTime}})
|
|
|
|
pool, err := evidence.NewPool(dbm.NewMemDB(), stateStore, blockStore)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
evList := types.EvidenceList{goodEv}
|
|
err = pool.CheckEvidence(evList)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func makeVote(
|
|
t *testing.T, val types.PrivValidator, chainID string, valIndex int32, height int64,
|
|
round int32, step int, blockID types.BlockID, time time.Time) *types.Vote {
|
|
pubKey, err := val.GetPubKey()
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
v := &types.Vote{
|
|
ValidatorAddress: pubKey.Address(),
|
|
ValidatorIndex: valIndex,
|
|
Height: height,
|
|
Round: round,
|
|
Type: tmproto.SignedMsgType(step),
|
|
BlockID: blockID,
|
|
Timestamp: time,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
vpb := v.ToProto()
|
|
err = val.SignVote(chainID, vpb)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
panic(err)
|
|
}
|
|
v.Signature = vpb.Signature
|
|
return v
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func makeHeaderRandom(height int64) *types.Header {
|
|
return &types.Header{
|
|
Version: tmversion.Consensus{Block: version.BlockProtocol, App: 1},
|
|
ChainID: evidenceChainID,
|
|
Height: height,
|
|
Time: defaultEvidenceTime,
|
|
LastBlockID: makeBlockID([]byte("headerhash"), 1000, []byte("partshash")),
|
|
LastCommitHash: crypto.CRandBytes(tmhash.Size),
|
|
DataHash: crypto.CRandBytes(tmhash.Size),
|
|
ValidatorsHash: crypto.CRandBytes(tmhash.Size),
|
|
NextValidatorsHash: crypto.CRandBytes(tmhash.Size),
|
|
ConsensusHash: crypto.CRandBytes(tmhash.Size),
|
|
AppHash: crypto.CRandBytes(tmhash.Size),
|
|
LastResultsHash: crypto.CRandBytes(tmhash.Size),
|
|
EvidenceHash: crypto.CRandBytes(tmhash.Size),
|
|
ProposerAddress: crypto.CRandBytes(crypto.AddressSize),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func makeBlockID(hash []byte, partSetSize uint32, partSetHash []byte) types.BlockID {
|
|
var (
|
|
h = make([]byte, tmhash.Size)
|
|
psH = make([]byte, tmhash.Size)
|
|
)
|
|
copy(h, hash)
|
|
copy(psH, partSetHash)
|
|
return types.BlockID{
|
|
Hash: h,
|
|
PartSetHeader: types.PartSetHeader{
|
|
Total: partSetSize,
|
|
Hash: psH,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|