package behaviour_test
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"sync"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
bh "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/behaviour"
|
|
"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// TestMockReporter tests the MockReporter's ability to store reported
|
|
// peer behaviour in memory indexed by the peerID.
|
|
func TestMockReporter(t *testing.T) {
|
|
var peerID p2p.NodeID = "MockPeer"
|
|
pr := bh.NewMockReporter()
|
|
|
|
behaviours := pr.GetBehaviours(peerID)
|
|
if len(behaviours) != 0 {
|
|
t.Error("Expected to have no behaviours reported")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
badMessage := bh.BadMessage(peerID, "bad message")
|
|
if err := pr.Report(badMessage); err != nil {
|
|
t.Error(err)
|
|
}
|
|
behaviours = pr.GetBehaviours(peerID)
|
|
if len(behaviours) != 1 {
|
|
t.Error("Expected the peer have one reported behaviour")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if behaviours[0] != badMessage {
|
|
t.Error("Expected Bad Message to have been reported")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type scriptItem struct {
|
|
peerID p2p.NodeID
|
|
behaviour bh.PeerBehaviour
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// equalBehaviours returns true if a and b contain the same PeerBehaviours with
|
|
// the same freequencies and otherwise false.
|
|
func equalBehaviours(a []bh.PeerBehaviour, b []bh.PeerBehaviour) bool {
|
|
aHistogram := map[bh.PeerBehaviour]int{}
|
|
bHistogram := map[bh.PeerBehaviour]int{}
|
|
|
|
for _, behaviour := range a {
|
|
aHistogram[behaviour]++
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, behaviour := range b {
|
|
bHistogram[behaviour]++
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(aHistogram) != len(bHistogram) {
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, behaviour := range a {
|
|
if aHistogram[behaviour] != bHistogram[behaviour] {
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, behaviour := range b {
|
|
if bHistogram[behaviour] != aHistogram[behaviour] {
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestEqualPeerBehaviours tests that equalBehaviours can tell that two slices
|
|
// of peer behaviours can be compared for the behaviours they contain and the
|
|
// freequencies that those behaviours occur.
|
|
func TestEqualPeerBehaviours(t *testing.T) {
|
|
var (
|
|
peerID p2p.NodeID = "MockPeer"
|
|
consensusVote = bh.ConsensusVote(peerID, "voted")
|
|
blockPart = bh.BlockPart(peerID, "blocked")
|
|
equals = []struct {
|
|
left []bh.PeerBehaviour
|
|
right []bh.PeerBehaviour
|
|
}{
|
|
// Empty sets
|
|
{[]bh.PeerBehaviour{}, []bh.PeerBehaviour{}},
|
|
// Single behaviours
|
|
{[]bh.PeerBehaviour{consensusVote}, []bh.PeerBehaviour{consensusVote}},
|
|
// Equal Frequencies
|
|
{[]bh.PeerBehaviour{consensusVote, consensusVote},
|
|
[]bh.PeerBehaviour{consensusVote, consensusVote}},
|
|
// Equal frequencies different orders
|
|
{[]bh.PeerBehaviour{consensusVote, blockPart},
|
|
[]bh.PeerBehaviour{blockPart, consensusVote}},
|
|
}
|
|
unequals = []struct {
|
|
left []bh.PeerBehaviour
|
|
right []bh.PeerBehaviour
|
|
}{
|
|
// Comparing empty sets to non empty sets
|
|
{[]bh.PeerBehaviour{}, []bh.PeerBehaviour{consensusVote}},
|
|
// Different behaviours
|
|
{[]bh.PeerBehaviour{consensusVote}, []bh.PeerBehaviour{blockPart}},
|
|
// Same behaviour with different frequencies
|
|
{[]bh.PeerBehaviour{consensusVote},
|
|
[]bh.PeerBehaviour{consensusVote, consensusVote}},
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
for _, test := range equals {
|
|
if !equalBehaviours(test.left, test.right) {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected %#v and %#v to be equal", test.left, test.right)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, test := range unequals {
|
|
if equalBehaviours(test.left, test.right) {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected %#v and %#v to be unequal", test.left, test.right)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestPeerBehaviourConcurrency constructs a scenario in which
|
|
// multiple goroutines are using the same MockReporter instance.
|
|
// This test reproduces the conditions in which MockReporter will
|
|
// be used within a Reactor `Receive` method tests to ensure thread safety.
|
|
func TestMockPeerBehaviourReporterConcurrency(t *testing.T) {
|
|
var (
|
|
behaviourScript = []struct {
|
|
peerID p2p.NodeID
|
|
behaviours []bh.PeerBehaviour
|
|
}{
|
|
{"1", []bh.PeerBehaviour{bh.ConsensusVote("1", "")}},
|
|
{"2", []bh.PeerBehaviour{bh.ConsensusVote("2", ""), bh.ConsensusVote("2", ""), bh.ConsensusVote("2", "")}},
|
|
{
|
|
"3",
|
|
[]bh.PeerBehaviour{bh.BlockPart("3", ""),
|
|
bh.ConsensusVote("3", ""),
|
|
bh.BlockPart("3", ""),
|
|
bh.ConsensusVote("3", "")}},
|
|
{
|
|
"4",
|
|
[]bh.PeerBehaviour{bh.ConsensusVote("4", ""),
|
|
bh.ConsensusVote("4", ""),
|
|
bh.ConsensusVote("4", ""),
|
|
bh.ConsensusVote("4", "")}},
|
|
{
|
|
"5",
|
|
[]bh.PeerBehaviour{bh.BlockPart("5", ""),
|
|
bh.ConsensusVote("5", ""),
|
|
bh.BlockPart("5", ""),
|
|
bh.ConsensusVote("5", "")}},
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
var receiveWg sync.WaitGroup
|
|
pr := bh.NewMockReporter()
|
|
scriptItems := make(chan scriptItem)
|
|
done := make(chan int)
|
|
numConsumers := 3
|
|
for i := 0; i < numConsumers; i++ {
|
|
receiveWg.Add(1)
|
|
go func() {
|
|
defer receiveWg.Done()
|
|
for {
|
|
select {
|
|
case pb := <-scriptItems:
|
|
if err := pr.Report(pb.behaviour); err != nil {
|
|
t.Error(err)
|
|
}
|
|
case <-done:
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var sendingWg sync.WaitGroup
|
|
sendingWg.Add(1)
|
|
go func() {
|
|
defer sendingWg.Done()
|
|
for _, item := range behaviourScript {
|
|
for _, reason := range item.behaviours {
|
|
scriptItems <- scriptItem{item.peerID, reason}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
sendingWg.Wait()
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < numConsumers; i++ {
|
|
done <- 1
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
receiveWg.Wait()
|
|
|
|
for _, items := range behaviourScript {
|
|
reported := pr.GetBehaviours(items.peerID)
|
|
if !equalBehaviours(reported, items.behaviours) {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected peer %s to have behaved \nExpected: %#v \nGot %#v \n",
|
|
items.peerID, items.behaviours, reported)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|