Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
---|---|---|---|
Sam Kleinman |
94e1eb8cfe
|
rfc: fix link style (#6870)
This is super minor, but chaning this to fix a broken link and to match the existing style of the ADRs. |
3 years ago |
Sam Kleinman |
23abb0de8b
|
rfc: p2p next steps (#6866) | 3 years ago |
M. J. Fromberger |
ce3c059a0d
|
ADR 072: Re-instate a request-for-comments archive. (#6851)
This ADR restores a variation of the old Request for Comments documentation that we previously used. The proposal differs from the original formulation, and does not replace ADRs. |
3 years ago |
Tess Rinearson |
3761aa6904
|
docs: remove RFC section and s/RFC001/ADR066 (#6345)
Per conversations earlier today, we'll consider all proposed implementation changes part of the ADR process rather than the RFC process (which will remain, for now, on the spec; this may get incorporated instead into the burgeoning "CIPS" process). This change renames RFC 1 to ADR 66, leaving space for the not-yet-merged ADR 65. |
4 years ago |
Marko |
bf6bd2cefa
|
docs: make rfc section disppear (#5353)
## Description Hide the RFC section from the docs website. Closes: #XXX |
4 years ago |