merged the existing store into pool, consolidated the three buckets into two, used block height as a marked for committed evidence, evidence list recovers on start up, improved error handling
- Move core stateless validation of the Header type to a ValidateBasic method.
- Call header.ValidateBasic during a SignedHeader validation.
- Call header.ValidateBasic during a PhantomValidatorEvidence validation.
- Call header.ValidateBasic during a LunaticValidatorEvidence validation.
lite tests are skipped since the package is deprecated, no need to waste time on it
closes: #4572
Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com>
- regenerate proto using docker image
- on proto breakage a different compiler is used to generate some more helper functions, on master the same one os not used, reverting back to the one used on master to undo further confusion till proto-breakage is merged
Signed-off-by: Marko Baricevic <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
* Added "Edit this page" box
* Fixed link styles
* Fixed build-time errors
* Updated VuePress and dependencies
<!-- < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < ☺
v ✰ Thanks for creating a PR! ✰
v Before smashing the submit button please review the checkboxes.
v If a checkbox is n/a - please still include it but + a little note why
☺ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -->
## Description
<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review.
-->
Closes: #XXX
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
- [ ] Applied Appropriate Labels
<!-- < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < ☺
v ✰ Thanks for creating a PR! ✰
v Before smashing the submit button please review the checkboxes.
v If a checkbox is n/a - please still include it but + a little note why
☺ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -->
## Description
- this pr add a check box for making sure labels are added to PRs
Signed-off-by: Marko Baricevic <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
Closes: #4530
This PR contains logic for both submitting an evidence by the light client (lite2 package) and receiving it on the Tendermint side (/broadcast_evidence RPC and/or EvidenceReactor#Receive). Upon receiving the ConflictingHeadersEvidence (introduced by this PR), the Tendermint validates it, then breaks it down into smaller pieces (DuplicateVoteEvidence, LunaticValidatorEvidence, PhantomValidatorEvidence, PotentialAmnesiaEvidence). Afterwards, each piece of evidence is verified against the state of the full node and added to the pool, from which it's reaped upon block creation.
* rpc/client: do not pass height param if height ptr is nil
* rpc/core: validate incoming evidence!
* only accept ConflictingHeadersEvidence if one
of the headers is committed from this full node's perspective
This simplifies the code. Plus, if there are multiple forks, we'll
likely to receive multiple ConflictingHeadersEvidence anyway.
* swap CommitSig with Vote in LunaticValidatorEvidence
Vote is needed to validate signature
* no need to embed client
http is a provider and should not be used as a client
Updates our Security Policy with takeaways from Security Advisory
Lavender and the associated security releases.
Thank you to @melekes and @alessio for reviewing earlier versions
of this document.
Closes: #4695
Verify /block_results and /validators responses from an HTTP client using the light client.
Added count and total to /validators response.
Refs #3113
in TestPEXReactorDialsPeerUpToMaxAttemptsInSeedMode
Closes#4668
______
For contributor use:
- [x] Wrote tests
- [ ] ~~Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md~~
- [x] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] ~~Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments~~
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
## Description
move tests for abci_cli, abci_app and app_tests to github actions
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
Followup from #4588. Allow the first `SaveBlock()` call in an empty block store to be at any height, to start from a truncated block history. Subsequent `SaveBlock()` calls must be for contiguous blocks.
______
For contributor use:
- [x] Wrote tests
- [ ] ~Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md~
- [x] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [x] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
The service logging can be a bit unclear. For example, with state sync it would log:
```
I[2020-04-20|08:40:47.366] Starting StateSync module=statesync impl=Reactor
I[2020-04-20|08:40:47.834] Starting state sync module=statesync
```
Where the first message is the reactor service startup, and the second message is the start of the actual state sync process. This clarifies the first message by changing it to `Starting StateSync service`.
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] ~Wrote tests~
- [ ] ~Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md~
- [ ] ~Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.~
- [ ] ~Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments~
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
See #4588 for original change.
I believe this is appropriate. Anything else that needs to be updated?
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] ~Wrote tests~
- [x] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [x] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] ~Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments~
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
## Description
ADR to address the process for proving an amnesia attack (as a form of global evidence) from `PotentialAmnesiaEvidence` detected by light clients
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
## Description
The minor release process is changing in order to not have major release changes sitting in the pull request tab.
This changes from taking master and releasing from master to creating a branch that you cherry-pick commits into.
There are two options on labeling which pull requests to include in a minor release:
1. Use the label `R:minor` to know which pull requests to include then remove the label when those pull requests have been included in a release.
2. Create an Issue where pull request numbers are added. then the issue is closed when the release is done.
this process should be followed after 0.33.3
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
## Description
Fixes a bug where the reactor would broadcast a base with height=0.
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
<!-- < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < ☺
v ✰ Thanks for creating a PR! ✰
v Before smashing the submit button please review the checkboxes.
v If a checkbox is n/a - please still include it but + a little note why
☺ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -->
Fixes an issue reported in https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/issues/4595#issuecomment-612667441.
Not sure if this is sufficient to fully remove the reactor, but it fixes the immediate problem.
______
For contributor use:
- [x] Wrote tests
- [x] ~Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md~
- [x] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [x] ~Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments~
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
How to use it:
```
$ . <(tendermint completion)
```
Note that the completion command does not show up in the help screen,
though it comes with its own --help option.
This is a port of the feature provided by cosmos-sdk.
Add Has function, create better handling of errors when adding evidence, usage of error types.
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>