closes: #8039
This pull request updates the new ABCI++ protos to use `enum`s in place of `bool`s. `enums` may be preferred over `bool` because an `enum` can be udpated to include new statuses in the future, whereas a `bool` cannot and is fixed as just `true` or `false` over the whole lifecycle of the API.
This change implements the logic for the PrepareProposal ABCI++ method call. The main logic for creating and issuing the PrepareProposal request lives in execution.go and is tested in a set of new tests in execution_test.go. This change also updates the mempool mock to use a mockery generated version and removes much of the plumbing for the no longer used ABCIResponses.
This change set implements the most recent version of `FinalizeBlock`.
# What does this change actually contain?
* This change set is rather large but fear not! The majority of the files touched and changes are renaming `ResponseDeliverTx` to `ExecTxResult`. This should be a pretty inoffensive change since they're effectively the same type but with a different name.
* The `execBlockOnProxyApp` was totally removed since it served as just a wrapper around the logic that is now mostly encapsulated within `FinalizeBlock`
* The `updateState` helper function has been made a public method on `State`. It was being exposed as a shim through the testing infrastructure, so this seemed innocuous.
* Tests already existed to ensure that the application received the `ByzantineValidators` and the `ValidatorUpdates`, but one was fixed up to ensure that `LastCommitInfo` was being sent across.
* Tests were removed from the `psql` indexer that seemed to search for an event in the indexer that was not being created.
# Questions for reviewers
* We store this [ABCIResponses](5721a13ab1/proto/tendermint/state/types.pb.go (L37)) type in the data base as the block results. This type has changed since v0.35 to contain the `FinalizeBlock` response. I'm wondering if we need to do any shimming to keep the old data retrieveable?
* Similarly, this change is exposed via the RPC through [ResultBlockResults](5721a13ab1/rpc/coretypes/responses.go (L69)) changing. Should we somehow shim or notify for this change?
closes: #7658
This change implements the spec for `ProcessProposal`. It first calls the Tendermint block validation logic to check that all of the proposed block fields are well formed and do not violate any of the rules for Tendermint to consider the block valid and then passes the validated block the `ProcessProposal`.
This change also adds additional fixtures to test the change. It adds the `baseMock` types that holds a mock as well as a reference to `BaseApplication`. If the function was not setup by the test on the contained mock Application, the type delegates to the `BaseApplication` and returns what `BaseApplication` returns.
The change also switches the `makeState` helper to take an arg struct so that an ABCI application can be plumbed through when needed.
closes: #7656
## Description
In https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/pull/4466 a new type was created (EventAttribute) that replaced KV.Pair. This made the type Pair deadcode, this pr removes that type.
I don't think a changelog entry is needed since it is not being used anymore. But will add a section to the upgrading.md to let users know that it was replaced
Closes: #XXX
* Remove omitempty from *pb.go
- remove omitempty from *pb.go files
- added command to makefile for everytime `make protoc_all` is run
- open question:
- Do we want to further remove omitempty from other places
- https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/blob/master/rpc/lib/types/types.go#L151
- and other places
ref #3882
Signed-off-by: Marko Baricevic <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
* bring back omitempty to *pb.go
* Update types/tx.go
* custom marshlers
* undo benchmark `omitepmty`
* golangci lint fix
* cleanup comments
* changelog_pending entry
William Banfield
Sergio Mena
mconcat
Callum Waters
Marko
Zach Ramsay