* consensus: calculate prevote message delay metric (#7551)
## What does this pull request do?
This pull requests adds two metrics intended for use in calculating an experimental value for `MessageDelay`.
The metrics are as follows:
```
# HELP tendermint_consensus_complete_prevote_message_delay Difference in seconds between the proposal timestamp and the timestamp of the prevote that achieved 100% of the voting power in the prevote step.
# TYPE tendermint_consensus_complete_prevote_message_delay gauge
tendermint_consensus_complete_prevote_message_delay{chain_id="test-chain-aZbwF1"} 0.013025505
# HELP tendermint_consensus_quorum_prevote_message_delay Difference in seconds between the proposal timestamp and the timestamp of the prevote that achieved a quorum in the prevote step.
# TYPE tendermint_consensus_quorum_prevote_message_delay gauge
tendermint_consensus_quorum_prevote_message_delay{chain_id="test-chain-aZbwF1"} 0.013025505
```
## Why this change?
For more information on what these metrics are calculating, see #7202. The aim is to merge to backport these metrics to v0.34 and run nodes on a few popular chains with these metrics to determine the experimental values for `MessageDelay` on these popular chains and use these to select our default `SynchronyParams.MessageDelay` value.
## Why Gauges for the metrics?
Gauges allow us to overwrite the metric on each successive observation. We can then capture these metrics over time to track the highest and lowest observed value.
(cherry picked from commit 0c82ceaa5f)
# Conflicts:
# consensus/metrics.go
# consensus/state.go
* fix merge conflicts
Co-authored-by: William Banfield <4561443+williambanfield@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: William Banfield <wbanfield@gmail.com>
Issues reported in Osmosis, where the message is extremely long. Also, there is absolutely no reason to log the message IMO. If we must, we can make the message log DEBUG.
(cherry picked from commit 58a6cfff9a)
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com>
This is an attempt to clean up the logging message as requested in #6269.
(cherry picked from commit 3f9066b290)
Co-authored-by: Sam Kleinman <garen@tychoish.com>
Executed a local network using simapp and looked for logs that seemed superfluous. This isn't by any means an exhaustive grooming, but should drastically help legibility of logs.
ref: #5912
Conflicting votes are now sent to the evidence pool to form duplicate vote evidence only once
the height of the evidence is finished and the time of the block finalised.
blockchain/vX reactor priority was decreased because during the normal operation
(i.e. when the node is not fast syncing) blockchain priority can't be
the same as consensus reactor priority. Otherwise, it's theoretically possible to
slow down consensus by constantly requesting blocks from the node.
NOTE: ideally blockchain/vX reactor priority would be dynamic. e.g. when
the node is fast syncing, the priority is 10 (max), but when it's done
fast syncing - the priority gets decreased to 5 (only to serve blocks
for other nodes). But it's not possible now, therefore I decided to
focus on the normal operation (priority = 5).
evidence and consensus critical messages are more important than
the mempool ones, hence priorities are bumped by 1 (from 5 to 6).
statesync reactor priority was changed from 1 to 5 to be the same as
blockchain/vX priority.
Refs https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/issues/5816
After a reactor has failed to parse an incoming message, it shouldn't output the "bad" data into the logs, as that data is unfiltered and could have anything in it. (We also don't think this information is helpful to have in the logs anyways.)
This fixes spurious `TestByzantinePrevoteEquivocation` failures by extending the block range and time spent waiting for evidence. I've seen many runs where the evidence isn't committed until e.g. height 27. Haven't looked into _why_ this happens, but as long as the evidence is committed eventually and the test doesn't spuriously fail I'm (mostly) happy. WDYT @cmwaters?
## Description
Part of the issue is to add metrics to the websocket connection. It seems this would require some moving around of things in the node pkg. I opted to not make this change now, and wait for when we do a node pkg refactor.
If someone disagrees with this appraoch please let me know, I can attempt to get metrics into the rpc layer.
There is not a need to update documentation as it already states this metric is a histogram..
Closes: #1791
## Description
Add missing metrics.
`Blockchain/v2` exposes metrics for events. I don't find these as something a node operator should utilize as it does not bring insight.
Closes: #XXX
## Description
This PR aims to make the crypto.PubKey interface more intuitive.
Changes:
- `VerfiyBytes` -> `VerifySignature`
Before `Bytes()` was amino encoded, now since it is the byte representation should we get rid of it entirely?
EDIT: decided to keep `Bytes()` as it is useful if you are using the interface instead of the concrete key
Closes: #XXX
Followup from #5227. Instead of checking `ResponseInitChain.app_hash` against the genesis doc app hash, we instead replace it. We should probably remove the genesis doc app hash completely, and rely solely on the one from `InitChain`, I'll open a separate issue to discuss this.
Adds a genesis parameter `initial_height` which specifies the initial block height, as well as ABCI `RequestInitChain.InitialHeight` to pass it to the ABCI application, and `State.InitialHeight` to keep track of the initial height throughout the code. Fixes#2543, based on [RFC-002](https://github.com/tendermint/spec/pull/119). Spec changes in https://github.com/tendermint/spec/pull/135.
## Description
Add test vectors for all reactors
- [x] state-sync
- [x] privval
- [x] mempool
- [x] p2p
- [x] evidence
- [ ] light?
this PR is primarily oriented at testvectors for things going over the wire. should we expand the testvectors into types as well?
Closes: #XXX
Fixes#5192.
@liamsi Can you verify that the test vectors match the Rust implementation? I updated `ProofsFromByteSlices()` as well, anything else that should be updated?
mergify[bot]
Marko
dependabot[bot]
Sam Kleinman
Tess Rinearson
Aleksandr Bezobchuk
Callum Waters
Anton Kaliaev
Erik Grinaker
QuantumExplorer
dongsam
