<!-- < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < ☺
v ✰ Thanks for creating a PR! ✰
v Before smashing the submit button please review the checkboxes.
v If a checkbox is n/a - please still include it but + a little note why
☺ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -->
## Description
- this pr add a check box for making sure labels are added to PRs
Signed-off-by: Marko Baricevic <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
Closes: #4530
This PR contains logic for both submitting an evidence by the light client (lite2 package) and receiving it on the Tendermint side (/broadcast_evidence RPC and/or EvidenceReactor#Receive). Upon receiving the ConflictingHeadersEvidence (introduced by this PR), the Tendermint validates it, then breaks it down into smaller pieces (DuplicateVoteEvidence, LunaticValidatorEvidence, PhantomValidatorEvidence, PotentialAmnesiaEvidence). Afterwards, each piece of evidence is verified against the state of the full node and added to the pool, from which it's reaped upon block creation.
* rpc/client: do not pass height param if height ptr is nil
* rpc/core: validate incoming evidence!
* only accept ConflictingHeadersEvidence if one
of the headers is committed from this full node's perspective
This simplifies the code. Plus, if there are multiple forks, we'll
likely to receive multiple ConflictingHeadersEvidence anyway.
* swap CommitSig with Vote in LunaticValidatorEvidence
Vote is needed to validate signature
* no need to embed client
http is a provider and should not be used as a client
Updates our Security Policy with takeaways from Security Advisory
Lavender and the associated security releases.
Thank you to @melekes and @alessio for reviewing earlier versions
of this document.
Closes: #4695
Verify /block_results and /validators responses from an HTTP client using the light client.
Added count and total to /validators response.
Refs #3113
in TestPEXReactorDialsPeerUpToMaxAttemptsInSeedMode
Closes#4668
______
For contributor use:
- [x] Wrote tests
- [ ] ~~Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md~~
- [x] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] ~~Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments~~
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
## Description
move tests for abci_cli, abci_app and app_tests to github actions
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
Followup from #4588. Allow the first `SaveBlock()` call in an empty block store to be at any height, to start from a truncated block history. Subsequent `SaveBlock()` calls must be for contiguous blocks.
______
For contributor use:
- [x] Wrote tests
- [ ] ~Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md~
- [x] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [x] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
The service logging can be a bit unclear. For example, with state sync it would log:
```
I[2020-04-20|08:40:47.366] Starting StateSync module=statesync impl=Reactor
I[2020-04-20|08:40:47.834] Starting state sync module=statesync
```
Where the first message is the reactor service startup, and the second message is the start of the actual state sync process. This clarifies the first message by changing it to `Starting StateSync service`.
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] ~Wrote tests~
- [ ] ~Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md~
- [ ] ~Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.~
- [ ] ~Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments~
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
See #4588 for original change.
I believe this is appropriate. Anything else that needs to be updated?
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] ~Wrote tests~
- [x] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [x] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] ~Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments~
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
## Description
ADR to address the process for proving an amnesia attack (as a form of global evidence) from `PotentialAmnesiaEvidence` detected by light clients
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
## Description
The minor release process is changing in order to not have major release changes sitting in the pull request tab.
This changes from taking master and releasing from master to creating a branch that you cherry-pick commits into.
There are two options on labeling which pull requests to include in a minor release:
1. Use the label `R:minor` to know which pull requests to include then remove the label when those pull requests have been included in a release.
2. Create an Issue where pull request numbers are added. then the issue is closed when the release is done.
this process should be followed after 0.33.3
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
## Description
Fixes a bug where the reactor would broadcast a base with height=0.
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
<!-- < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < ☺
v ✰ Thanks for creating a PR! ✰
v Before smashing the submit button please review the checkboxes.
v If a checkbox is n/a - please still include it but + a little note why
☺ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -->
Fixes an issue reported in https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/issues/4595#issuecomment-612667441.
Not sure if this is sufficient to fully remove the reactor, but it fixes the immediate problem.
______
For contributor use:
- [x] Wrote tests
- [x] ~Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md~
- [x] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [x] ~Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments~
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
How to use it:
```
$ . <(tendermint completion)
```
Note that the completion command does not show up in the help screen,
though it comes with its own --help option.
This is a port of the feature provided by cosmos-sdk.
Add Has function, create better handling of errors when adding evidence, usage of error types.
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* mark unsolicited and too frequent messaged as bad
* add tests
* update changelog and fix error
* revised error types
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Added BlockStore.DeleteBlock()
* Added initial block pruner prototype
* wip
* Added BlockStore.PruneBlocks()
* Added consensus setting for block pruning
* Added BlockStore base
* Error on replay if base does not have blocks
* Handle missing blocks when sending VoteSetMaj23Message
* Error message tweak
* Properly update blockstore state
* Error message fix again
* blockchain: ignore peer missing blocks
* Added FIXME
* Added test for block replay with truncated history
* Handle peer base in blockchain reactor
* Improved replay error handling
* Added tests for Store.PruneBlocks()
* Fix non-RPC handling of truncated block history
* Panic on missing block meta in needProofBlock()
* Updated changelog
* Handle truncated block history in RPC layer
* Added info about earliest block in /status RPC
* Reorder height and base in blockchain reactor messages
* Updated changelog
* Fix tests
* Appease linter
* Minor review fixes
* Non-empty BlockStores should always have base > 0
* Update code to assume base > 0 invariant
* Added blockstore tests for pruning to 0
* Make sure we don't prune below the current base
* Added BlockStore.Size()
* config: added retain_blocks recommendations
* Update v1 blockchain reactor to handle blockstore base
* Added state database pruning
* Propagate errors on missing validator sets
* Comment tweaks
* Improved error message
Co-Authored-By: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com>
* use ABCI field ResponseCommit.retain_height instead of retain-blocks config option
* remove State.RetainHeight, return value instead
* fix minor issues
* rename pruneHeights() to pruneBlocks()
* noop to fix GitHub borkage
Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com>
Closes: #4537
Uses SignedHeaderBefore to find header before unverified header and then bisection to verify the header. Only when header is between first and last trusted header height else if before the first trusted header height then regular backwards verification is used.
* proto: use docker to generate stubs
- provide an option to developers to use docker to generate proto stubs
closes#4579
Signed-off-by: Marko Baricevic <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
Marko
Anton Kaliaev
Tess Rinearson
Erik Grinaker
Callum Waters
dependabot-preview[bot]
Alessio Treglia
Denis Fadeev
Alexander Bezobchuk
Yongwoo Lee