tendermint

291 MiB

Tree: 65cdb07f0c

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Ethan Buchman	3d00c477fc	separate block vs state based validation	7 years ago
Anton Kaliaev	843e1ed400	Updates -> ValidatoSetUpdates	7 years ago
Ethan Frey	960b25408f	Store LastConsensusHash in State as well Update all BlockValidation that it matches the last state	7 years ago
Ethan Frey	d151e36ea8	Add ConsensusHash to header	7 years ago
Ethan Buchman	78a682e4b6	blockchain: test fixes	7 years ago
Ethan Frey	dedf03bb81	Add TotalTx to block header, issue #952 Update state to keep track of this info. Change function args as needed. Make NumTx also an int64 for consistency.	7 years ago
Emmanuel Odeke	2da5299924	blockchain: less fragile and involved tests for blockstore With feedback from @ebuchman, to make the tests nicer and less fragile.	7 years ago
Anton Kaliaev	922af7c405	int64 height uint64 is considered dangerous. the details will follow in a blog post.	7 years ago
Anton Kaliaev	b3492356e6	uint64 height (Refs #911 )	7 years ago
Anton Kaliaev	e06bbaf303	refactor TestNoBlockMessageResponse to eliminate a race condition	7 years ago
Anton Kaliaev	716364182d	[state] expose ChainID and Params ``` jaekwon Yeah we should definitely expose ChainID. ConsensusParams is small enough, we can just write it. ``` https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/pull/676#discussion_r144123203	7 years ago
Ethan Buchman	659768783f	blockchain: fixing reactor tests	7 years ago
Emmanuel Odeke	068f01368f	blockchain/reactor: respondWithNoResponseMessage for missing height Fixes #514 Replaces #540 If a peer requests a block with a height that we don't have respond with a bcNoBlockResponseMessage. However, according to the Tendermint spec, if all nodes are honest this condition shouldn't occur, so this is a possible hint of an dishonest node.	7 years ago

14 Commits (65cdb07f0c7e97d4e8d2d8b7ef6fd0dbe5651785)