The service logging can be a bit unclear. For example, with state sync it would log:
```
I[2020-04-20|08:40:47.366] Starting StateSync module=statesync impl=Reactor
I[2020-04-20|08:40:47.834] Starting state sync module=statesync
```
Where the first message is the reactor service startup, and the second message is the start of the actual state sync process. This clarifies the first message by changing it to `Starting StateSync service`.
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] ~Wrote tests~
- [ ] ~Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md~
- [ ] ~Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.~
- [ ] ~Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments~
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
See #4588 for original change.
I believe this is appropriate. Anything else that needs to be updated?
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] ~Wrote tests~
- [x] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [x] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] ~Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments~
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
## Description
ADR to address the process for proving an amnesia attack (as a form of global evidence) from `PotentialAmnesiaEvidence` detected by light clients
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
## Description
The minor release process is changing in order to not have major release changes sitting in the pull request tab.
This changes from taking master and releasing from master to creating a branch that you cherry-pick commits into.
There are two options on labeling which pull requests to include in a minor release:
1. Use the label `R:minor` to know which pull requests to include then remove the label when those pull requests have been included in a release.
2. Create an Issue where pull request numbers are added. then the issue is closed when the release is done.
this process should be followed after 0.33.3
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
## Description
Fixes a bug where the reactor would broadcast a base with height=0.
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
______
For contributor use:
- [ ] Wrote tests
- [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
<!-- < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < ☺
v ✰ Thanks for creating a PR! ✰
v Before smashing the submit button please review the checkboxes.
v If a checkbox is n/a - please still include it but + a little note why
☺ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -->
Fixes an issue reported in https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/issues/4595#issuecomment-612667441.
Not sure if this is sufficient to fully remove the reactor, but it fixes the immediate problem.
______
For contributor use:
- [x] Wrote tests
- [x] ~Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md~
- [x] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [x] ~Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments~
- [x] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
How to use it:
```
$ . <(tendermint completion)
```
Note that the completion command does not show up in the help screen,
though it comes with its own --help option.
This is a port of the feature provided by cosmos-sdk.
Add Has function, create better handling of errors when adding evidence, usage of error types.
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* mark unsolicited and too frequent messaged as bad
* add tests
* update changelog and fix error
* revised error types
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Added BlockStore.DeleteBlock()
* Added initial block pruner prototype
* wip
* Added BlockStore.PruneBlocks()
* Added consensus setting for block pruning
* Added BlockStore base
* Error on replay if base does not have blocks
* Handle missing blocks when sending VoteSetMaj23Message
* Error message tweak
* Properly update blockstore state
* Error message fix again
* blockchain: ignore peer missing blocks
* Added FIXME
* Added test for block replay with truncated history
* Handle peer base in blockchain reactor
* Improved replay error handling
* Added tests for Store.PruneBlocks()
* Fix non-RPC handling of truncated block history
* Panic on missing block meta in needProofBlock()
* Updated changelog
* Handle truncated block history in RPC layer
* Added info about earliest block in /status RPC
* Reorder height and base in blockchain reactor messages
* Updated changelog
* Fix tests
* Appease linter
* Minor review fixes
* Non-empty BlockStores should always have base > 0
* Update code to assume base > 0 invariant
* Added blockstore tests for pruning to 0
* Make sure we don't prune below the current base
* Added BlockStore.Size()
* config: added retain_blocks recommendations
* Update v1 blockchain reactor to handle blockstore base
* Added state database pruning
* Propagate errors on missing validator sets
* Comment tweaks
* Improved error message
Co-Authored-By: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com>
* use ABCI field ResponseCommit.retain_height instead of retain-blocks config option
* remove State.RetainHeight, return value instead
* fix minor issues
* rename pruneHeights() to pruneBlocks()
* noop to fix GitHub borkage
Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com>
Closes: #4537
Uses SignedHeaderBefore to find header before unverified header and then bisection to verify the header. Only when header is between first and last trusted header height else if before the first trusted header height then regular backwards verification is used.
* proto: use docker to generate stubs
- provide an option to developers to use docker to generate proto stubs
closes#4579
Signed-off-by: Marko Baricevic <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
Previously, many reactors were initialized with the name "Reactor," which made it difficult to log which reactor was doing what. This changes those reactors' names to something more descriptive.
- defined what variables needed to be changed in the `config.toml` in order to run a validator.
- Briefly explained how a sentry node archtecture should look
- add section explaing importance of key secruity
Signed-off-by: Marko Baricevic <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
* tools: remove need to install buf
- using buf docker image instead of needing devs to install it
Signed-off-by: Marko Baricevic <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
* fix ci for lint and break checking
Closes: #4546
The algorithm uses an array to store the headers and validators and populates it at every bisection (which is an unsuccessful verification). When a successful verification finally occurs it updates the new trusted header, trims that header from the cache (the array) and sets the depth pointer back to 0. Instead of retrieving new headers it will use the cached headers, incrementing in depth until it reaches the end of the cache which by then it will start to retrieve new headers from the provider.
Mathematically, this method doesn't properly bisect after the first round but it will always choose a pivot header that is within 1/8th of the upper header's height. I.e. if we are trying to jump 128 headers, the maximum offset from bisection height (64) is 64 + 16(128/8) = 80, therefore a better heuristic would be to obtain the new pivot header height as the middle of these two numbers which would therefore mean to multiply it by 9/16ths instead of 1/2 (sorry this might be a bit more complicated in writing but I can try better explain if someone is interested). Therefore I would also, upon consensus, propose that we change the pivot height to 9/16th's of the previous height
* blockchain: enable v2 to be set
- enable v2 to be set via config params
Signed-off-by: Marko Baricevic <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
* replace tab with space
* correctly spell usability
Erik Grinaker
Callum Waters
Anton Kaliaev
Marko
dependabot-preview[bot]
Alessio Treglia
Tess Rinearson
Denis Fadeev
Alexander Bezobchuk
Yongwoo Lee