* validate reactor messages

Refs #2683

* validate blockchain messages

Refs #2683

* validate evidence messages

Refs #2683

* todo

* check ProposalPOL and signature sizes

* add a changelog entry

* check addr is valid when we add it to the addrbook

* validate incoming netAddr (not just nil check!)

* fixes after Bucky's review

* check timestamps

* beef up block#ValidateBasic

* move some checks into bcBlockResponseMessage

* update Gopkg.lock

Fix

```
grouped write of manifest, lock and vendor: failed to export github.com/tendermint/go-amino: fatal: failed to unpack tree object 6dcc6ddc14
```

by running `dep ensure -update`

* bump year since now we check it

* generate test/p2p/data on the fly using tendermint testnet

* allow sync chains older than 1 year

* use full path when creating a testnet

* move testnet gen to test/docker/Dockerfile

* relax LastCommitRound check

Refs #2737

* fix conflicts after merge

* add small comment

* some ValidateBasic updates

* fixes

* AppHash length is not fixed

* remove ConsensusParams.TxSize and ConsensusParams.BlockGossip

Refs #2347

* block part size is now fixed

Refs #2347

* use max data size, not max bytes for tx limit

Refs #2347

* libs: Remove usage of custom Fmt, in favor of fmt.Sprintf

Closes #2193

* Fix bug that was masked by custom Fmt!

* Removed unnecessary onStart & onStop calls in reactor

* Refactor OnStart & OnStop in reactor

* Removed redundant OnStart func in reactor

This reverts commit d02c5d1e30.

Refs #646

Should be paired with https://github.com/tendermint/iavl/pull/65.

This reverts commit 96a3502

Refs #1317

1. remove pointer
2. add Quit() method to Service interface

uint64 is considered dangerous. the details will follow in a blog post.

See https://github.com/tendermint/tmlibs/issues/45

comment out failing consensus tests for now

rewrite rpc httpclient to use new pubsub package

import pubsub as tmpubsub, query as tmquery

make event IDs constants
EventKey -> EventTypeKey

rename EventsPubsub to PubSub

mempool does not use pubsub

rename eventsSub to pubsub

new subscribe API

fix channel size issues and consensus tests bugs

refactor rpc client

add missing discardFromChan method

add mutex

rename pubsub to eventBus

remove IsRunning from WSRPCConnection interface (not needed)

add a comment in broadcastNewRoundStepsAndVotes

rename registerEventCallbacks to broadcastNewRoundStepsAndVotes

See https://dave.cheney.net/2014/03/19/channel-axioms

stop eventBuses after reactor tests

remove unnecessary Unsubscribe

return subscribe helper function

move discardFromChan to where it is used

subscribe now returns an err

this gives us ability to refuse to subscribe if pubsub is at its max
capacity.

use context for control overflow

cache queries

handle err when subscribing in replay_test

rename testClientID to testSubscriber

extract var

set channel buffer capacity to 1 in replay_file

fix byzantine_test

unsubscribe from single event, not all events

refactor httpclient to return events to appropriate channels

return failing testReplayCrashBeforeWriteVote test

fix TestValidatorSetChanges

refactor code a bit

fix testReplayCrashBeforeWriteVote

add comment

fix TestValidatorSetChanges

fixes from Bucky's review

update comment [ci skip]

test TxEventBuffer

update changelog

fix TestValidatorSetChanges (2nd attempt)

only do wg.Done when no errors

benchmark event bus

create pubsub server inside NewEventBus

only expose config params (later if needed)

set buffer capacity to 0 so we are not testing cache

new tx event format: key = "Tx" plus a tag {"tx.hash": XYZ}

This should allow to subscribe to all transactions! or a specific one
using a query: "tm.events.type = Tx and tx.hash = '013ABF99434...'"

use TimeoutCommit instead of afterPublishEventNewBlockTimeout

TimeoutCommit is the time a node waits after committing a block, before
it goes into the next height. So it will finish everything from the last
block, but then wait a bit. The idea is this gives it time to hear more
votes from other validators, to strengthen the commit it includes in the
next block. But it also gives it time to hear about new transactions.

waitForBlockWithUpdatedVals

rewrite WAL crash tests

Task:
test that we can recover from any WAL crash.

Solution:
the old tests were relying on event hub being run in the same thread (we
were injecting the private validator's last signature).

when considering a rewrite, we considered two possible solutions: write
a "fuzzy" testing system where WAL is crashing upon receiving a new
message, or inject failures and trigger them in tests using something
like https://github.com/coreos/gofail.

remove sleep

no cs.Lock around wal.Save

test different cases (empty block, non-empty block, ...)

comments

add comments

test 4 cases: empty block, non-empty block, non-empty block with smaller part size, many blocks

fixes as per Bucky's last review

reset subscriptions on UnsubscribeAll

use a simple counter to track message for which we panicked

also, set a smaller part size for all test cases

```
jaekwon
Yeah we should definitely expose ChainID.
ConsensusParams is small enough, we can just write it.
```
https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/pull/676#discussion_r144123203

- remove state#GenesisDoc() method

Fixes #671

Unexpose GenesisDoc and ChainID fields to avoid them being
serialized to the DB on every block write/state.Save()

A GenesisDoc can now be alternatively written to the state's
database, by serializing its JSON as a value of key "genesis-doc".

There are now accessors and a setter for these attributes:
- state.GenesisDoc() (*types.GenesisDoc, error)
- state.ChainID() (string, error)
- state.SetGenesisDoc(*types.GenesisDoc)

This is a breaking change since it changes how the state's
serialization and requires that if loading the GenesisDoc entirely
from the database, you'll need to set its value in the database
as the GenesisDoc's JSON marshaled bytes.

Fixes #514
Replaces #540

If a peer requests a block with a height that we don't have
respond with a bcNoBlockResponseMessage.
However, according to the Tendermint spec, if all nodes are honest
this condition shouldn't occur, so this is a possible hint of an
dishonest node.