tendermint

291 MiB

Tree: 162f67cf26

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Callum Waters	019d2a3689	ADR 047 - Light client evidence handling revision (#5273 )	4 years ago
Callum Waters	a88f031b1b	ADR 59 evidence composition and lifecycle (#5331 )	4 years ago
Marko	c2ce5e6f35	docs: move subscription to tendermint-core (#5323 ) ## Description - Move subscriptions to tendermint-core section. - Remove unused photot Closes: #XXX	4 years ago
Erik Grinaker	476d49c27d	docs: move tcp-window.png to imgs/ Possibly fixes #4842. I'm not familiar with the doc generation pipeline, but other images under `imgs/` seem to work so just cargo-culting it.	5 years ago
Callum Waters	55909aac68	docs/architecture: create adr 56: prove amnesia attack ## Description ADR to address the process for proving an amnesia attack (as a form of global evidence) from `PotentialAmnesiaEvidence` detected by light clients ______ For contributor use: - [ ] Wrote tests - [ ] Updated CHANGELOG_PENDING.md - [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work. - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) and code comments - [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer	5 years ago
Callum Waters	a25faed5f0	lite2: cache headers in bisection (#4562 ) Closes: #4546 The algorithm uses an array to store the headers and validators and populates it at every bisection (which is an unsuccessful verification). When a successful verification finally occurs it updates the new trusted header, trims that header from the cache (the array) and sets the depth pointer back to 0. Instead of retrieving new headers it will use the cached headers, incrementing in depth until it reaches the end of the cache which by then it will start to retrieve new headers from the provider. Mathematically, this method doesn't properly bisect after the first round but it will always choose a pivot header that is within 1/8th of the upper header's height. I.e. if we are trying to jump 128 headers, the maximum offset from bisection height (64) is 64 + 16(128/8) = 80, therefore a better heuristic would be to obtain the new pivot header height as the middle of these two numbers which would therefore mean to multiply it by 9/16ths instead of 1/2 (sorry this might be a bit more complicated in writing but I can try better explain if someone is interested). Therefore I would also, upon consensus, propose that we change the pivot height to 9/16th's of the previous height	5 years ago
Sean Braithwaite	f309077465	update CONTRIBUTING.md (#4180 ) * First pass at updating the contribution guidelines * Update CONTRIBUTING.md Co-Authored-By: Tess Rinearson <tess.rinearson@gmail.com> * Update CONTRIBUTING.md Co-Authored-By: Tess Rinearson <tess.rinearson@gmail.com> * Update CONTRIBUTING.md Co-Authored-By: Tess Rinearson <tess.rinearson@gmail.com> * Update CONTRIBUTING.md Co-Authored-By: Tess Rinearson <tess.rinearson@gmail.com> * Align text flow with diagram * tweaks based on feedback * add text for existing issue * tweaks	5 years ago
Zach	8003786c9a	docs: fixes from 'first time' review (#2999 )	6 years ago
Zach Ramsay	b30596b3a1	docs: fix links & other imrpvoements	6 years ago

9 Commits (162f67cf26ccbcf8a9b3117d8a59ed62600b22f3)