* validate reactor messages
Refs #2683
* validate blockchain messages
Refs #2683
* validate evidence messages
Refs #2683
* todo
* check ProposalPOL and signature sizes
* add a changelog entry
* check addr is valid when we add it to the addrbook
* validate incoming netAddr (not just nil check!)
* fixes after Bucky's review
* check timestamps
* beef up block#ValidateBasic
* move some checks into bcBlockResponseMessage
* update Gopkg.lock
Fix
```
grouped write of manifest, lock and vendor: failed to export github.com/tendermint/go-amino: fatal: failed to unpack tree object 6dcc6ddc14
```
by running `dep ensure -update`
* bump year since now we check it
* generate test/p2p/data on the fly using tendermint testnet
* allow sync chains older than 1 year
* use full path when creating a testnet
* move testnet gen to test/docker/Dockerfile
* relax LastCommitRound check
Refs #2737
* fix conflicts after merge
* add small comment
* some ValidateBasic updates
* fixes
* AppHash length is not fixed
* types: add Version to Header
* abci: add Version to Header
* state: add Version to State
* node: check software and state protocol versions match
* update changelog
* docs/spec: update for versions
* state: more tests
* remove TODOs
* remove empty test
* require block.Time of the fist block to be genesis time
Refs #2587:
```
We only start validating block.Time when Height > 1, because there is no
commit to compute the median timestamp from for the first block. This
means a faulty proposer could make the first block with whatever time
they want.
Instead, we should require the timestamp of block 1 to match the genesis
time.
I discovered this while refactoring the ValidateBlock tests to be
table-driven while working on tests for #2560.
```
* do not accept blocks with negative height
* update changelog and spec
* nanos precision for test genesis time
* Fix failing test (#2607)
- state.MakeBlock takes a proposerAddr
- validateBlock only checks that the ProposerAddress is in the validator
set
- fix raceyness from bad proposer test:
- use privValidator to get the proposer address (instead of racy
state)
- note we had to remove the test that checked the correct proposer was
included for higher rounds because we don't have a good way to test
this with multiple consensus states and not using the
privValidator.Address while calling createProposalBlock was a hack!
Anton Kaliaev
Ethan Buchman
Dev Ojha
Zarko Milosevic
Zach Ramsay
Jae Kwon
Liamsi