- Open questions
- Do we want to split lite client work from consesnsus
- From the blockchain spec, is encoding nessecary in the spec
Signed-off-by: Marko Baricevic <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
* state -> step
* vote -> v
* New version of the algorithm and the proof
* New version of the algorithm and the proofs
* Added algorithm description
* Add algorithm description
* Add introduction
* Add conclusion
* Add conclusion file
* fix warnings (caption was defined twice)
- only the latter is used anyways (centers captions)
- this makes it possible to autom. building the paper
* Update grammar
* s/state_p/step_p
* Address Ismail's comments
* intro: language fixes
* definitions: language fixes
* consensus: various fixes
* proof: some fixes
* try to improve reviewability
* \eq -> =
* textwrap to 79
* various minor fixes
* proof: fix itemization
* proof: more minor fixes
* proof: timeouts are functions
* proof: fixes to lemma6
* Intro changes and improve title page
* Add Marko and Ming to acks
* add readme
* Format algorithm correctly
Clarify condition semantic and timeouts
Improve descriptions
* patform -> platform
* Ensure that rules are mutually exclusive
- various clarifications and small improvements
* Release v0.6
* small nits for smoother readability
Marko
milosevic
milosevic
Milosevic, Zarko