|
@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ |
|
|
|
|
|
--- order: 3 --- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# PBTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document provides an overview of the Proposer-Based Timestamp (PBTS) |
|
|
|
|
|
algorithm added to Tendermint in the v0.36 release. It outlines the core |
|
|
|
|
|
functionality as well as the parameters and constraints of the this algorithm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Algorithm Overview |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PBTS algorithm defines a way for a Tendermint blockchain to create block |
|
|
|
|
|
timestamps that are within a reasonable bound of the clocks of the validators on |
|
|
|
|
|
the network. This replaces the original BFTTime algorithm for timestamp |
|
|
|
|
|
assignment that relied on the timestamps included in precommit messages. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Algorithm Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The functionality of the PBTS algorithm is governed by two parameters within |
|
|
|
|
|
Tendermint. These two parameters are [consensus |
|
|
|
|
|
parameters](https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/blob/master/spec/abci/apps.md#L291), |
|
|
|
|
|
meaning they are configured by the ABCI application and are expected to be the |
|
|
|
|
|
same across all nodes on the network. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### `Precision` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `Precision` parameter configures the acceptable upper-bound of clock drift |
|
|
|
|
|
among all of the nodes on a Tendermint network. Any two nodes on a Tendermint |
|
|
|
|
|
network are expected to have clocks that differ by at most `Precision` |
|
|
|
|
|
milliseconds any given instant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### `MessageDelay` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `MessageDelay` parameter configures the acceptable upper-bound for |
|
|
|
|
|
transmitting a `Proposal` message from the proposer to _all_ of the validators |
|
|
|
|
|
on the network. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Networks should choose as small a value for `MessageDelay` as is practical, |
|
|
|
|
|
provided it is large enough that messages can reach all participants with high |
|
|
|
|
|
probability given the number of participants and latency of their connections. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Algorithm Concepts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Block timestamps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block produced by the Tendermint consensus engine contains a timestamp. |
|
|
|
|
|
The timestamp produced in each block is a meaningful representation of time that is |
|
|
|
|
|
useful for the protocols and applications built on top of Tendermint. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following protocols and application features require a reliable source of time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Tendermint Light Clients [rely on correspondence between their known time](https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/blob/master/spec/light-client/verification/README.md#definitions-1) and the block time for block verification. |
|
|
|
|
|
* Tendermint Evidence validity is determined [either in terms of heights or in terms of time](https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/blob/master/spec/consensus/evidence.md#verification). |
|
|
|
|
|
* Unbonding of staked assets in the Cosmos Hub [occurs after a period of 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
days](https://github.com/cosmos/governance/blob/master/params-change/Staking.md#unbondingtime). |
|
|
|
|
|
* IBC packets can use either a [timestamp or a height to timeout packet |
|
|
|
|
|
delivery](https://docs.cosmos.network/v0.44/ibc/overview.html#acknowledgements) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Proposer Selects a Block Timestamp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the proposer node creates a new block proposal, the node reads the time |
|
|
|
|
|
from its local clock and uses this reading as the timestamp for the proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
block. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Timeliness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When each validator on a Tendermint network receives a proposed block, it |
|
|
|
|
|
performs a series of checks to ensure that the block can be considered valid as |
|
|
|
|
|
a candidate to be the next block in the chain. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PBTS algorithm performs a validity check on the timestamp of proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
blocks. When a validator receives a proposal it ensures that the timestamp in |
|
|
|
|
|
the proposal is within a bound of the validator's local clock. Specifically, the |
|
|
|
|
|
algorithm checks that the timestamp is no more than `Precision` greater than the |
|
|
|
|
|
node's local clock and no less than `Precision` + `MessageDelay` behind than the |
|
|
|
|
|
node's local clock. This creates range of acceptable timestamps around the |
|
|
|
|
|
node's local time. If the timestamp is within this range, the PBTS algorithm |
|
|
|
|
|
considers the block **timely**. If a block is not **timely**, the node will |
|
|
|
|
|
issue a `nil` `prevote` for this block, signaling to the rest of the network |
|
|
|
|
|
that the node does not consider the block to be valid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Clock Synchronization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PBTS algorithm requires the clocks of the validators on a Tendermint network |
|
|
|
|
|
are within `Precision` of each other. In practice, this means that validators |
|
|
|
|
|
should periodically synchronize to a reliable NTP server. Validators that drift |
|
|
|
|
|
too far away from the rest of the network will no longer propose blocks with |
|
|
|
|
|
valid timestamps. Additionally they will not view the timestamps of blocks |
|
|
|
|
|
proposed by their peers to be valid either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## See Also |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* [The PBTS specification](https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/blob/master/spec/consensus/proposer-based-timestamp/README.md) |
|
|
|
|
|
contains all of the details of the algorithm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|