You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

450 lines
18 KiB

6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
  1. # Applications
  2. Please ensure you've first read the spec for [ABCI Methods and Types](abci.md)
  3. Here we cover the following components of ABCI applications:
  4. - [Connection State](#state) - the interplay between ABCI connections and application state
  5. and the differences between `CheckTx` and `DeliverTx`.
  6. - [Transaction Results](#transaction-results) - rules around transaction
  7. results and validity
  8. - [Validator Set Updates](#validator-updates) - how validator sets are
  9. changed during `InitChain` and `EndBlock`
  10. - [Query](#query) - standards for using the `Query` method and proofs about the
  11. application state
  12. - [Crash Recovery](#crash-recovery) - handshake protocol to synchronize
  13. Tendermint and the application on startup.
  14. ## State
  15. Since Tendermint maintains three concurrent ABCI connections, it is typical
  16. for an application to maintain a distinct state for each, and for the states to
  17. be synchronized during `Commit`.
  18. ### Commit
  19. Application state should only be persisted to disk during `Commit`.
  20. Before `Commit` is called, Tendermint locks and flushes the mempool so that no new messages will
  21. be received on the mempool connection. This provides an opportunity to safely update all three
  22. states to the latest committed state at once.
  23. When `Commit` completes, it unlocks the mempool.
  24. WARNING: if the ABCI app logic processing the `Commit` message sends a
  25. `/broadcast_tx_sync` or `/broadcast_tx_commit` and waits for the response
  26. before proceeding, it will deadlock. Executing those `broadcast_tx` calls
  27. involves acquiring a lock that is held during the `Commit` call, so it's not
  28. possible. If you make the call to the `broadcast_tx` endpoints concurrently,
  29. that's no problem, it just can't be part of the sequential logic of the
  30. `Commit` function.
  31. ### Consensus Connection
  32. The Consensus Connection should maintain a `DeliverTxState` -
  33. the working state for block execution. It should be updated by the calls to
  34. `BeginBlock`, `DeliverTx`, and `EndBlock` during block execution and committed to
  35. disk as the "latest committed state" during `Commit`.
  36. Updates made to the DeliverTxState by each method call must be readable by each subsequent method -
  37. ie. the updates are linearizable.
  38. ### Mempool Connection
  39. The Mempool Connection should maintain a `CheckTxState`
  40. to sequentially process pending transactions in the mempool that have
  41. not yet been committed. It should be initialized to the latest committed state
  42. at the end of every `Commit`.
  43. The CheckTxState may be updated concurrently with the DeliverTxState, as
  44. messages may be sent concurrently on the Consensus and Mempool connections. However,
  45. before calling `Commit`, Tendermint will lock and flush the mempool connection,
  46. ensuring that all existing CheckTx are responded to and no new ones can
  47. begin.
  48. After `Commit`, CheckTx is run again on all transactions that remain in the
  49. node's local mempool after filtering those included in the block. To prevent the
  50. mempool from rechecking all transactions every time a block is committed, set
  51. the configuration option `mempool.recheck=false`.
  52. Finally, the mempool will unlock and new transactions can be processed through CheckTx again.
  53. Note that CheckTx doesn't have to check everything that affects transaction validity; the
  54. expensive things can be skipped. In fact, CheckTx doesn't have to check
  55. anything; it might say that any transaction is a valid transaction.
  56. Unlike DeliverTx, CheckTx is just there as
  57. a sort of weak filter to keep invalid transactions out of the blockchain. It's
  58. weak, because a Byzantine node doesn't care about CheckTx; it can propose a
  59. block full of invalid transactions if it wants.
  60. ### Info Connection
  61. The Info Connection should maintain a `QueryState` for answering queries from the user,
  62. and for initialization when Tendermint first starts up (both described further
  63. below).
  64. It should always contain the latest committed state associated with the
  65. latest committed block.
  66. QueryState should be set to the latest `DeliverTxState` at the end of every `Commit`,
  67. ie. after the full block has been processed and the state committed to disk.
  68. Otherwise it should never be modified.
  69. ## Transaction Results
  70. `ResponseCheckTx` and `ResponseDeliverTx` contain the same fields.
  71. The `Info` and `Log` fields are non-deterministic values for debugging/convenience purposes
  72. that are otherwise ignored.
  73. The `Data` field must be strictly deterministic, but can be arbitrary data.
  74. ### Gas
  75. Ethereum introduced the notion of `gas` as an abstract representation of the
  76. cost of resources used by nodes when processing transactions. Every operation in the
  77. Ethereum Virtual Machine uses some amount of gas, and gas can be accepted at a market-variable price.
  78. Users propose a maximum amount of gas for their transaction; if the tx uses less, they get
  79. the difference credited back. Tendermint adopts a similar abstraction,
  80. though uses it only optionally and weakly, allowing applications to define
  81. their own sense of the cost of execution.
  82. In Tendermint, the `ConsensusParams.Block.MaxGas` limits the amount of `gas` that can be used in a block.
  83. The default value is `-1`, meaning no limit, or that the concept of gas is
  84. meaningless.
  85. Responses contain a `GasWanted` and `GasUsed` field. The former is the maximum
  86. amount of gas the sender of a tx is willing to use, and the later is how much it actually
  87. used. Applications should enforce that `GasUsed <= GasWanted` - ie. tx execution
  88. should halt before it can use more resources than it requested.
  89. When `MaxGas > -1`, Tendermint enforces the following rules:
  90. - `GasWanted <= MaxGas` for all txs in the mempool
  91. - `(sum of GasWanted in a block) <= MaxGas` when proposing a block
  92. If `MaxGas == -1`, no rules about gas are enforced.
  93. Note that Tendermint does not currently enforce anything about Gas in the consensus, only the mempool.
  94. This means it does not guarantee that committed blocks satisfy these rules!
  95. It is the application's responsibility to return non-zero response codes when gas limits are exceeded.
  96. The `GasUsed` field is ignored completely by Tendermint. That said, applications should enforce:
  97. - `GasUsed <= GasWanted` for any given transaction
  98. - `(sum of GasUsed in a block) <= MaxGas` for every block
  99. In the future, we intend to add a `Priority` field to the responses that can be
  100. used to explicitly prioritize txs in the mempool for inclusion in a block
  101. proposal. See [#1861](https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/issues/1861).
  102. ### CheckTx
  103. If `Code != 0`, it will be rejected from the mempool and hence
  104. not broadcasted to other peers and not included in a proposal block.
  105. `Data` contains the result of the CheckTx transaction execution, if any. It is
  106. semantically meaningless to Tendermint.
  107. `Tags` include any tags for the execution, though since the transaction has not
  108. been committed yet, they are effectively ignored by Tendermint.
  109. ### DeliverTx
  110. If DeliverTx returns `Code != 0`, the transaction will be considered invalid,
  111. though it is still included in the block.
  112. `Data` contains the result of the CheckTx transaction execution, if any. It is
  113. semantically meaningless to Tendermint.
  114. Both the `Code` and `Data` are included in a structure that is hashed into the
  115. `LastResultsHash` of the next block header.
  116. `Tags` include any tags for the execution, which Tendermint will use to index
  117. the transaction by. This allows transactions to be queried according to what
  118. events took place during their execution.
  119. See issue [#1007](https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/issues/1007) for how
  120. the tags will be hashed into the next block header.
  121. ## Validator Updates
  122. The application may set the validator set during InitChain, and update it during
  123. EndBlock.
  124. Note that the maximum total power of the validator set is bounded by
  125. `MaxTotalVotingPower = MaxInt64 / 8`. Applications are responsible for ensuring
  126. they do not make changes to the validator set that cause it to exceed this
  127. limit.
  128. Additionally, applications must ensure that a single set of updates does not contain any duplicates -
  129. a given public key can only appear in an update once. If an update includes
  130. duplicates, the block execution will fail irrecoverably.
  131. ### InitChain
  132. ResponseInitChain can return a list of validators.
  133. If the list is empty, Tendermint will use the validators loaded in the genesis
  134. file.
  135. If the list is not empty, Tendermint will use it for the validator set.
  136. This way the application can determine the initial validator set for the
  137. blockchain.
  138. ### EndBlock
  139. Updates to the Tendermint validator set can be made by returning
  140. `ValidatorUpdate` objects in the `ResponseEndBlock`:
  141. ```
  142. message ValidatorUpdate {
  143. PubKey pub_key
  144. int64 power
  145. }
  146. message PubKey {
  147. string type
  148. bytes data
  149. }
  150. ```
  151. The `pub_key` currently supports only one type:
  152. - `type = "ed25519" and`data = <raw 32-byte public key>`
  153. The `power` is the new voting power for the validator, with the
  154. following rules:
  155. - power must be non-negative
  156. - if power is 0, the validator must already exist, and will be removed from the
  157. validator set
  158. - if power is non-0:
  159. - if the validator does not already exist, it will be added to the validator
  160. set with the given power
  161. - if the validator does already exist, its power will be adjusted to the given power
  162. - the total power of the new validator set must not exceed MaxTotalVotingPower
  163. Note the updates returned in block `H` will only take effect at block `H+2`.
  164. ## Consensus Parameters
  165. ConsensusParams enforce certain limits in the blockchain, like the maximum size
  166. of blocks, amount of gas used in a block, and the maximum acceptable age of
  167. evidence. They can be set in InitChain and updated in EndBlock.
  168. ### Block.MaxBytes
  169. The maximum size of a complete Amino encoded block.
  170. This is enforced by Tendermint consensus.
  171. This implies a maximum tx size that is this MaxBytes, less the expected size of
  172. the header, the validator set, and any included evidence in the block.
  173. Must have `0 < MaxBytes < 100 MB`.
  174. ### Block.MaxGas
  175. The maximum of the sum of `GasWanted` in a proposed block.
  176. This is *not* enforced by Tendermint consensus.
  177. It is left to the app to enforce (ie. if txs are included past the
  178. limit, they should return non-zero codes). It is used by Tendermint to limit the
  179. txs included in a proposed block.
  180. Must have `MaxGas >= -1`.
  181. If `MaxGas == -1`, no limit is enforced.
  182. ### Block.TimeIotaMs
  183. The minimum time between consecutive blocks (in milliseconds).
  184. This is enforced by Tendermint consensus.
  185. Must have `TimeIotaMs > 0` to ensure time monotonicity.
  186. ### EvidenceParams.MaxAge
  187. This is the maximum age of evidence.
  188. This is enforced by Tendermint consensus.
  189. If a block includes evidence older than this, the block will be rejected
  190. (validators won't vote for it).
  191. Must have `MaxAge > 0`.
  192. ### Updates
  193. The application may set the ConsensusParams during InitChain, and update them during
  194. EndBlock. If the ConsensusParams is empty, it will be ignored. Each field
  195. that is not empty will be applied in full. For instance, if updating the
  196. Block.MaxBytes, applications must also set the other Block fields (like
  197. Block.MaxGas), even if they are unchanged, as they will otherwise cause the
  198. value to be updated to 0.
  199. #### InitChain
  200. ResponseInitChain includes a ConsensusParams.
  201. If its nil, Tendermint will use the params loaded in the genesis
  202. file. If it's not nil, Tendermint will use it.
  203. This way the application can determine the initial consensus params for the
  204. blockchain.
  205. #### EndBlock
  206. ResponseEndBlock includes a ConsensusParams.
  207. If its nil, Tendermint will do nothing.
  208. If it's not nil, Tendermint will use it.
  209. This way the application can update the consensus params over time.
  210. Note the updates returned in block `H` will take effect right away for block
  211. `H+1`.
  212. ## Query
  213. Query is a generic method with lots of flexibility to enable diverse sets
  214. of queries on application state. Tendermint makes use of Query to filter new peers
  215. based on ID and IP, and exposes Query to the user over RPC.
  216. Note that calls to Query are not replicated across nodes, but rather query the
  217. local node's state - hence they may return stale reads. For reads that require
  218. consensus, use a transaction.
  219. The most important use of Query is to return Merkle proofs of the application state at some height
  220. that can be used for efficient application-specific lite-clients.
  221. Note Tendermint has technically no requirements from the Query
  222. message for normal operation - that is, the ABCI app developer need not implement
  223. Query functionality if they do not wish too.
  224. ### Query Proofs
  225. The Tendermint block header includes a number of hashes, each providing an
  226. anchor for some type of proof about the blockchain. The `ValidatorsHash` enables
  227. quick verification of the validator set, the `DataHash` gives quick
  228. verification of the transactions included in the block, etc.
  229. The `AppHash` is unique in that it is application specific, and allows for
  230. application-specific Merkle proofs about the state of the application.
  231. While some applications keep all relevant state in the transactions themselves
  232. (like Bitcoin and its UTXOs), others maintain a separated state that is
  233. computed deterministically *from* transactions, but is not contained directly in
  234. the transactions themselves (like Ethereum contracts and accounts).
  235. For such applications, the `AppHash` provides a much more efficient way to verify lite-client proofs.
  236. ABCI applications can take advantage of more efficient lite-client proofs for
  237. their state as follows:
  238. - return the Merkle root of the deterministic application state in
  239. `ResponseCommit.Data`.
  240. - it will be included as the `AppHash` in the next block.
  241. - return efficient Merkle proofs about that application state in `ResponseQuery.Proof`
  242. that can be verified using the `AppHash` of the corresponding block.
  243. For instance, this allows an application's lite-client to verify proofs of
  244. absence in the application state, something which is much less efficient to do using the block hash.
  245. Some applications (eg. Ethereum, Cosmos-SDK) have multiple "levels" of Merkle trees,
  246. where the leaves of one tree are the root hashes of others. To support this, and
  247. the general variability in Merkle proofs, the `ResponseQuery.Proof` has some minimal structure:
  248. ```
  249. message Proof {
  250. repeated ProofOp ops
  251. }
  252. message ProofOp {
  253. string type = 1;
  254. bytes key = 2;
  255. bytes data = 3;
  256. }
  257. ```
  258. Each `ProofOp` contains a proof for a single key in a single Merkle tree, of the specified `type`.
  259. This allows ABCI to support many different kinds of Merkle trees, encoding
  260. formats, and proofs (eg. of presence and absence) just by varying the `type`.
  261. The `data` contains the actual encoded proof, encoded according to the `type`.
  262. When verifying the full proof, the root hash for one ProofOp is the value being
  263. verified for the next ProofOp in the list. The root hash of the final ProofOp in
  264. the list should match the `AppHash` being verified against.
  265. ### Peer Filtering
  266. When Tendermint connects to a peer, it sends two queries to the ABCI application
  267. using the following paths, with no additional data:
  268. - `/p2p/filter/addr/<IP:PORT>`, where `<IP:PORT>` denote the IP address and
  269. the port of the connection
  270. - `p2p/filter/id/<ID>`, where `<ID>` is the peer node ID (ie. the
  271. pubkey.Address() for the peer's PubKey)
  272. If either of these queries return a non-zero ABCI code, Tendermint will refuse
  273. to connect to the peer.
  274. ### Paths
  275. Queries are directed at paths, and may optionally include additional data.
  276. The expectation is for there to be some number of high level paths
  277. differentiating concerns, like `/p2p`, `/store`, and `/app`. Currently,
  278. Tendermint only uses `/p2p`, for filtering peers. For more advanced use, see the
  279. implementation of
  280. [Query in the Cosmos-SDK](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/v0.23.1/baseapp/baseapp.go#L333).
  281. ## Crash Recovery
  282. On startup, Tendermint calls the `Info` method on the Info Connection to get the latest
  283. committed state of the app. The app MUST return information consistent with the
  284. last block it succesfully completed Commit for.
  285. If the app succesfully committed block H but not H+1, then `last_block_height = H` and `last_block_app_hash = <hash returned by Commit for block H>`. If the app
  286. failed during the Commit of block H, then `last_block_height = H-1` and
  287. `last_block_app_hash = <hash returned by Commit for block H-1, which is the hash in the header of block H>`.
  288. We now distinguish three heights, and describe how Tendermint syncs itself with
  289. the app.
  290. ```
  291. storeBlockHeight = height of the last block Tendermint saw a commit for
  292. stateBlockHeight = height of the last block for which Tendermint completed all
  293. block processing and saved all ABCI results to disk
  294. appBlockHeight = height of the last block for which ABCI app succesfully
  295. completed Commit
  296. ```
  297. Note we always have `storeBlockHeight >= stateBlockHeight` and `storeBlockHeight >= appBlockHeight`
  298. Note also we never call Commit on an ABCI app twice for the same height.
  299. The procedure is as follows.
  300. First, some simple start conditions:
  301. If `appBlockHeight == 0`, then call InitChain.
  302. If `storeBlockHeight == 0`, we're done.
  303. Now, some sanity checks:
  304. If `storeBlockHeight < appBlockHeight`, error
  305. If `storeBlockHeight < stateBlockHeight`, panic
  306. If `storeBlockHeight > stateBlockHeight+1`, panic
  307. Now, the meat:
  308. If `storeBlockHeight == stateBlockHeight && appBlockHeight < storeBlockHeight`,
  309. replay all blocks in full from `appBlockHeight` to `storeBlockHeight`.
  310. This happens if we completed processing the block, but the app forgot its height.
  311. If `storeBlockHeight == stateBlockHeight && appBlockHeight == storeBlockHeight`, we're done.
  312. This happens if we crashed at an opportune spot.
  313. If `storeBlockHeight == stateBlockHeight+1`
  314. This happens if we started processing the block but didn't finish.
  315. If `appBlockHeight < stateBlockHeight`
  316. replay all blocks in full from `appBlockHeight` to `storeBlockHeight-1`,
  317. and replay the block at `storeBlockHeight` using the WAL.
  318. This happens if the app forgot the last block it committed.
  319. If `appBlockHeight == stateBlockHeight`,
  320. replay the last block (storeBlockHeight) in full.
  321. This happens if we crashed before the app finished Commit
  322. If `appBlockHeight == storeBlockHeight`
  323. update the state using the saved ABCI responses but dont run the block against the real app.
  324. This happens if we crashed after the app finished Commit but before Tendermint saved the state.