You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

128 lines
3.7 KiB

rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
  1. package server
  2. import (
  3. "context"
  4. "errors"
  5. "fmt"
  6. "net/http"
  7. "reflect"
  8. "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/log"
  9. )
  10. // RegisterRPCFuncs adds a route to mux for each non-websocket function in the
  11. // funcMap, and also a root JSON-RPC POST handler.
  12. func RegisterRPCFuncs(mux *http.ServeMux, funcMap map[string]*RPCFunc, logger log.Logger) {
  13. for name, fn := range funcMap {
  14. if fn.ws {
  15. continue // skip websocket endpoints, not usable via GET calls
  16. }
  17. mux.HandleFunc("/"+name, makeHTTPHandler(fn, logger))
  18. }
  19. // Endpoints for POST.
  20. mux.HandleFunc("/", handleInvalidJSONRPCPaths(makeJSONRPCHandler(funcMap, logger)))
  21. }
  22. // Function introspection
  23. // RPCFunc contains the introspected type information for a function.
  24. type RPCFunc struct {
  25. f reflect.Value // underlying rpc function
  26. args []reflect.Type // type of each function arg
  27. returns []reflect.Type // type of each return arg
  28. argNames []string // name of each argument
  29. ws bool // websocket only
  30. }
  31. // NewRPCFunc constructs an RPCFunc for f, which must be a function whose type
  32. // signature matches one of these schemes:
  33. //
  34. // func(context.Context, T1, T2, ...) error
  35. // func(context.Context, T1, T2, ...) (R, error)
  36. //
  37. // for arbitrary types T_i and R. The number of argNames must exactly match the
  38. // number of non-context arguments to f. Otherwise, NewRPCFunc panics.
  39. //
  40. // The parameter names given are used to map JSON object keys to the
  41. // corresonding parameter of the function. The names do not need to match the
  42. // declared names, but must match what the client sends in a request.
  43. func NewRPCFunc(f interface{}, argNames ...string) *RPCFunc {
  44. rf, err := newRPCFunc(f, argNames)
  45. if err != nil {
  46. panic("invalid RPC function: " + err.Error())
  47. }
  48. return rf
  49. }
  50. // NewWSRPCFunc behaves as NewRPCFunc, but marks the resulting function for use
  51. // via websocket.
  52. func NewWSRPCFunc(f interface{}, argNames ...string) *RPCFunc {
  53. rf := NewRPCFunc(f, argNames...)
  54. rf.ws = true
  55. return rf
  56. }
  57. var (
  58. ctxType = reflect.TypeOf((*context.Context)(nil)).Elem()
  59. errType = reflect.TypeOf((*error)(nil)).Elem()
  60. )
  61. // newRPCFunc constructs an RPCFunc for f. See the comment at NewRPCFunc.
  62. func newRPCFunc(f interface{}, argNames []string) (*RPCFunc, error) {
  63. if f == nil {
  64. return nil, errors.New("nil function")
  65. }
  66. // Check the type and signature of f.
  67. fv := reflect.ValueOf(f)
  68. if fv.Kind() != reflect.Func {
  69. return nil, errors.New("not a function")
  70. }
  71. ft := fv.Type()
  72. if np := ft.NumIn(); np == 0 {
  73. return nil, errors.New("wrong number of parameters")
  74. } else if ft.In(0) != ctxType {
  75. return nil, errors.New("first parameter is not context.Context")
  76. } else if np-1 != len(argNames) {
  77. return nil, fmt.Errorf("have %d names for %d parameters", len(argNames), np-1)
  78. }
  79. if no := ft.NumOut(); no < 1 || no > 2 {
  80. return nil, errors.New("wrong number of results")
  81. } else if ft.Out(no-1) != errType {
  82. return nil, errors.New("last result is not error")
  83. }
  84. args := make([]reflect.Type, ft.NumIn())
  85. for i := 0; i < ft.NumIn(); i++ {
  86. args[i] = ft.In(i)
  87. }
  88. outs := make([]reflect.Type, ft.NumOut())
  89. for i := 0; i < ft.NumOut(); i++ {
  90. outs[i] = ft.Out(i)
  91. }
  92. return &RPCFunc{
  93. f: fv,
  94. args: args,
  95. returns: outs,
  96. argNames: argNames,
  97. }, nil
  98. }
  99. //-------------------------------------------------------------
  100. // NOTE: assume returns is result struct and error. If error is not nil, return it
  101. func unreflectResult(returns []reflect.Value) (interface{}, error) {
  102. errV := returns[1]
  103. if err, ok := errV.Interface().(error); ok && err != nil {
  104. return nil, err
  105. }
  106. rv := returns[0]
  107. // the result is a registered interface,
  108. // we need a pointer to it so we can marshal with type byte
  109. rvp := reflect.New(rv.Type())
  110. rvp.Elem().Set(rv)
  111. return rvp.Interface(), nil
  112. }