You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

268 lines
7.7 KiB

rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
cleanup: Reduce and normalize import path aliasing. (#6975) The code in the Tendermint repository makes heavy use of import aliasing. This is made necessary by our extensive reuse of common base package names, and by repetition of similar names across different subdirectories. Unfortunately we have not been very consistent about which packages we alias in various circumstances, and the aliases we use vary. In the spirit of the advice in the style guide and https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments#imports, his change makes an effort to clean up and normalize import aliasing. This change makes no API or behavioral changes. It is a pure cleanup intended o help make the code more readable to developers (including myself) trying to understand what is being imported where. Only unexported names have been modified, and the changes were generated and applied mechanically with gofmt -r and comby, respecting the lexical and syntactic rules of Go. Even so, I did not fix every inconsistency. Where the changes would be too disruptive, I left it alone. The principles I followed in this cleanup are: - Remove aliases that restate the package name. - Remove aliases where the base package name is unambiguous. - Move overly-terse abbreviations from the import to the usage site. - Fix lexical issues (remove underscores, remove capitalization). - Fix import groupings to more closely match the style guide. - Group blank (side-effecting) imports and ensure they are commented. - Add aliases to multiple imports with the same base package name.
3 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
cleanup: Reduce and normalize import path aliasing. (#6975) The code in the Tendermint repository makes heavy use of import aliasing. This is made necessary by our extensive reuse of common base package names, and by repetition of similar names across different subdirectories. Unfortunately we have not been very consistent about which packages we alias in various circumstances, and the aliases we use vary. In the spirit of the advice in the style guide and https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments#imports, his change makes an effort to clean up and normalize import aliasing. This change makes no API or behavioral changes. It is a pure cleanup intended o help make the code more readable to developers (including myself) trying to understand what is being imported where. Only unexported names have been modified, and the changes were generated and applied mechanically with gofmt -r and comby, respecting the lexical and syntactic rules of Go. Even so, I did not fix every inconsistency. Where the changes would be too disruptive, I left it alone. The principles I followed in this cleanup are: - Remove aliases that restate the package name. - Remove aliases where the base package name is unambiguous. - Move overly-terse abbreviations from the import to the usage site. - Fix lexical issues (remove underscores, remove capitalization). - Fix import groupings to more closely match the style guide. - Group blank (side-effecting) imports and ensure they are commented. - Add aliases to multiple imports with the same base package name.
3 years ago
cleanup: Reduce and normalize import path aliasing. (#6975) The code in the Tendermint repository makes heavy use of import aliasing. This is made necessary by our extensive reuse of common base package names, and by repetition of similar names across different subdirectories. Unfortunately we have not been very consistent about which packages we alias in various circumstances, and the aliases we use vary. In the spirit of the advice in the style guide and https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments#imports, his change makes an effort to clean up and normalize import aliasing. This change makes no API or behavioral changes. It is a pure cleanup intended o help make the code more readable to developers (including myself) trying to understand what is being imported where. Only unexported names have been modified, and the changes were generated and applied mechanically with gofmt -r and comby, respecting the lexical and syntactic rules of Go. Even so, I did not fix every inconsistency. Where the changes would be too disruptive, I left it alone. The principles I followed in this cleanup are: - Remove aliases that restate the package name. - Remove aliases where the base package name is unambiguous. - Move overly-terse abbreviations from the import to the usage site. - Fix lexical issues (remove underscores, remove capitalization). - Fix import groupings to more closely match the style guide. - Group blank (side-effecting) imports and ensure they are commented. - Add aliases to multiple imports with the same base package name.
3 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
  1. package server
  2. import (
  3. "bytes"
  4. "encoding/json"
  5. "errors"
  6. "fmt"
  7. "io"
  8. "net/http"
  9. "reflect"
  10. "sort"
  11. tmjson "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/json"
  12. "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/log"
  13. "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/rpc/coretypes"
  14. rpctypes "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/rpc/jsonrpc/types"
  15. )
  16. // HTTP + JSON handler
  17. // jsonrpc calls grab the given method's function info and runs reflect.Call
  18. func makeJSONRPCHandler(funcMap map[string]*RPCFunc, logger log.Logger) http.HandlerFunc {
  19. return func(w http.ResponseWriter, hreq *http.Request) {
  20. // For POST requests, reject a non-root URL path. This should not happen
  21. // in the standard configuration, since the wrapper checks the path.
  22. if hreq.URL.Path != "/" {
  23. writeRPCResponse(w, logger, rpctypes.RPCInvalidRequestError(
  24. nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid path: %q", hreq.URL.Path)))
  25. return
  26. }
  27. b, err := io.ReadAll(hreq.Body)
  28. if err != nil {
  29. writeRPCResponse(w, logger, rpctypes.RPCInvalidRequestError(
  30. nil, fmt.Errorf("reading request body: %w", err)))
  31. return
  32. }
  33. // if its an empty request (like from a browser), just display a list of
  34. // functions
  35. if len(b) == 0 {
  36. writeListOfEndpoints(w, hreq, funcMap)
  37. return
  38. }
  39. requests, err := parseRequests(b)
  40. if err != nil {
  41. writeRPCResponse(w, logger, rpctypes.RPCParseError(fmt.Errorf("decoding request: %w", err)))
  42. return
  43. }
  44. var responses []rpctypes.RPCResponse
  45. for _, req := range requests {
  46. // Ignore notifications, which this service does not support.
  47. if req.ID == nil {
  48. logger.Debug("Ignoring notification", "req", req)
  49. continue
  50. }
  51. rpcFunc, ok := funcMap[req.Method]
  52. if !ok || rpcFunc.ws {
  53. responses = append(responses, rpctypes.RPCMethodNotFoundError(req.ID))
  54. continue
  55. }
  56. args, err := parseParams(rpcFunc, hreq, req)
  57. if err != nil {
  58. responses = append(responses, rpctypes.RPCInvalidParamsError(
  59. req.ID, fmt.Errorf("converting JSON parameters: %w", err)))
  60. continue
  61. }
  62. returns := rpcFunc.f.Call(args)
  63. logger.Debug("HTTPJSONRPC", "method", req.Method, "args", args, "returns", returns)
  64. result, err := unreflectResult(returns)
  65. switch e := err.(type) {
  66. // if no error then return a success response
  67. case nil:
  68. responses = append(responses, rpctypes.NewRPCSuccessResponse(req.ID, result))
  69. // if this already of type RPC error then forward that error
  70. case *rpctypes.RPCError:
  71. responses = append(responses, rpctypes.NewRPCErrorResponse(req.ID, e.Code, e.Message, e.Data))
  72. default: // we need to unwrap the error and parse it accordingly
  73. switch errors.Unwrap(err) {
  74. // check if the error was due to an invald request
  75. case coretypes.ErrZeroOrNegativeHeight, coretypes.ErrZeroOrNegativePerPage,
  76. coretypes.ErrPageOutOfRange, coretypes.ErrInvalidRequest:
  77. responses = append(responses, rpctypes.RPCInvalidRequestError(req.ID, err))
  78. // lastly default all remaining errors as internal errors
  79. default: // includes ctypes.ErrHeightNotAvailable and ctypes.ErrHeightExceedsChainHead
  80. responses = append(responses, rpctypes.RPCInternalError(req.ID, err))
  81. }
  82. }
  83. }
  84. if len(responses) == 0 {
  85. return
  86. }
  87. writeRPCResponse(w, logger, responses...)
  88. }
  89. }
  90. func handleInvalidJSONRPCPaths(next http.HandlerFunc) http.HandlerFunc {
  91. return func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
  92. // Since the pattern "/" matches all paths not matched by other registered patterns,
  93. // we check whether the path is indeed "/", otherwise return a 404 error
  94. if r.URL.Path != "/" {
  95. http.NotFound(w, r)
  96. return
  97. }
  98. next(w, r)
  99. }
  100. }
  101. // parseRequests parses a JSON-RPC request or request batch from data.
  102. func parseRequests(data []byte) ([]rpctypes.RPCRequest, error) {
  103. var reqs []rpctypes.RPCRequest
  104. var err error
  105. isArray := bytes.HasPrefix(bytes.TrimSpace(data), []byte("["))
  106. if isArray {
  107. err = json.Unmarshal(data, &reqs)
  108. } else {
  109. reqs = append(reqs, rpctypes.RPCRequest{})
  110. err = json.Unmarshal(data, &reqs[0])
  111. }
  112. if err != nil {
  113. return nil, err
  114. }
  115. return reqs, nil
  116. }
  117. func mapParamsToArgs(
  118. rpcFunc *RPCFunc,
  119. params map[string]json.RawMessage,
  120. argsOffset int,
  121. ) ([]reflect.Value, error) {
  122. values := make([]reflect.Value, len(rpcFunc.argNames))
  123. for i, argName := range rpcFunc.argNames {
  124. argType := rpcFunc.args[i+argsOffset]
  125. if p, ok := params[argName]; ok && p != nil && len(p) > 0 {
  126. val := reflect.New(argType)
  127. err := tmjson.Unmarshal(p, val.Interface())
  128. if err != nil {
  129. return nil, err
  130. }
  131. values[i] = val.Elem()
  132. } else { // use default for that type
  133. values[i] = reflect.Zero(argType)
  134. }
  135. }
  136. return values, nil
  137. }
  138. func arrayParamsToArgs(
  139. rpcFunc *RPCFunc,
  140. params []json.RawMessage,
  141. argsOffset int,
  142. ) ([]reflect.Value, error) {
  143. if len(rpcFunc.argNames) != len(params) {
  144. return nil, fmt.Errorf("expected %v parameters (%v), got %v (%v)",
  145. len(rpcFunc.argNames), rpcFunc.argNames, len(params), params)
  146. }
  147. values := make([]reflect.Value, len(params))
  148. for i, p := range params {
  149. argType := rpcFunc.args[i+argsOffset]
  150. val := reflect.New(argType)
  151. err := tmjson.Unmarshal(p, val.Interface())
  152. if err != nil {
  153. return nil, err
  154. }
  155. values[i] = val.Elem()
  156. }
  157. return values, nil
  158. }
  159. // parseParams parses the JSON parameters of rpcReq into the arguments of fn,
  160. // returning the corresponding argument values or an error.
  161. func parseParams(fn *RPCFunc, httpReq *http.Request, rpcReq rpctypes.RPCRequest) ([]reflect.Value, error) {
  162. ctx := rpctypes.WithCallInfo(httpReq.Context(), &rpctypes.CallInfo{
  163. RPCRequest: &rpcReq,
  164. HTTPRequest: httpReq,
  165. })
  166. args := []reflect.Value{reflect.ValueOf(ctx)}
  167. if len(rpcReq.Params) == 0 {
  168. return args, nil
  169. }
  170. fargs, err := jsonParamsToArgs(fn, rpcReq.Params)
  171. if err != nil {
  172. return nil, err
  173. }
  174. return append(args, fargs...), nil
  175. }
  176. // raw is unparsed json (from json.RawMessage) encoding either a map or an
  177. // array.
  178. //
  179. // Example:
  180. // rpcFunc.args = [context.Context string]
  181. // rpcFunc.argNames = ["arg"]
  182. func jsonParamsToArgs(rpcFunc *RPCFunc, raw []byte) ([]reflect.Value, error) {
  183. const argsOffset = 1
  184. // TODO: Make more efficient, perhaps by checking the first character for '{' or '['?
  185. // First, try to get the map.
  186. var m map[string]json.RawMessage
  187. err := json.Unmarshal(raw, &m)
  188. if err == nil {
  189. return mapParamsToArgs(rpcFunc, m, argsOffset)
  190. }
  191. // Otherwise, try an array.
  192. var a []json.RawMessage
  193. err = json.Unmarshal(raw, &a)
  194. if err == nil {
  195. return arrayParamsToArgs(rpcFunc, a, argsOffset)
  196. }
  197. // Otherwise, bad format, we cannot parse
  198. return nil, fmt.Errorf("unknown type for JSON params: %v. Expected map or array", err)
  199. }
  200. // writes a list of available rpc endpoints as an html page
  201. func writeListOfEndpoints(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, funcMap map[string]*RPCFunc) {
  202. noArgNames := []string{}
  203. argNames := []string{}
  204. for name, funcData := range funcMap {
  205. if len(funcData.args) == 0 {
  206. noArgNames = append(noArgNames, name)
  207. } else {
  208. argNames = append(argNames, name)
  209. }
  210. }
  211. sort.Strings(noArgNames)
  212. sort.Strings(argNames)
  213. buf := new(bytes.Buffer)
  214. buf.WriteString("<html><body>")
  215. buf.WriteString("<br>Available endpoints:<br>")
  216. for _, name := range noArgNames {
  217. link := fmt.Sprintf("//%s/%s", r.Host, name)
  218. buf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("<a href=\"%s\">%s</a></br>", link, link))
  219. }
  220. buf.WriteString("<br>Endpoints that require arguments:<br>")
  221. for _, name := range argNames {
  222. link := fmt.Sprintf("//%s/%s?", r.Host, name)
  223. funcData := funcMap[name]
  224. for i, argName := range funcData.argNames {
  225. link += argName + "=_"
  226. if i < len(funcData.argNames)-1 {
  227. link += "&"
  228. }
  229. }
  230. buf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("<a href=\"%s\">%s</a></br>", link, link))
  231. }
  232. buf.WriteString("</body></html>")
  233. w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "text/html")
  234. w.WriteHeader(200)
  235. w.Write(buf.Bytes()) // nolint: errcheck
  236. }