- package types
-
- import (
- "bytes"
- "errors"
- "fmt"
- "strings"
- "time"
-
- amino "github.com/tendermint/go-amino"
-
- "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/crypto"
- cryptoenc "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/crypto/encoding"
- "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/crypto/merkle"
- "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/crypto/tmhash"
- tmjson "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/json"
- tmmath "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/math"
- tmproto "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/proto/types"
- )
-
- const (
- // MaxEvidenceBytes is a maximum size of any evidence (including amino overhead).
- MaxEvidenceBytes int64 = 444
-
- // An invalid field in the header from LunaticValidatorEvidence.
- // Must be a function of the ABCI application state.
- ValidatorsHashField = "ValidatorsHash"
- NextValidatorsHashField = "NextValidatorsHash"
- ConsensusHashField = "ConsensusHash"
- AppHashField = "AppHash"
- LastResultsHashField = "LastResultsHash"
- )
-
- // ErrEvidenceInvalid wraps a piece of evidence and the error denoting how or why it is invalid.
- type ErrEvidenceInvalid struct {
- Evidence Evidence
- ErrorValue error
- }
-
- // NewErrEvidenceInvalid returns a new EvidenceInvalid with the given err.
- func NewErrEvidenceInvalid(ev Evidence, err error) *ErrEvidenceInvalid {
- return &ErrEvidenceInvalid{ev, err}
- }
-
- // Error returns a string representation of the error.
- func (err *ErrEvidenceInvalid) Error() string {
- return fmt.Sprintf("Invalid evidence: %v. Evidence: %v", err.ErrorValue, err.Evidence)
- }
-
- // ErrEvidenceOverflow is for when there is too much evidence in a block.
- type ErrEvidenceOverflow struct {
- MaxNum int
- GotNum int
- }
-
- // NewErrEvidenceOverflow returns a new ErrEvidenceOverflow where got > max.
- func NewErrEvidenceOverflow(max, got int) *ErrEvidenceOverflow {
- return &ErrEvidenceOverflow{max, got}
- }
-
- // Error returns a string representation of the error.
- func (err *ErrEvidenceOverflow) Error() string {
- return fmt.Sprintf("Too much evidence: Max %d, got %d", err.MaxNum, err.GotNum)
- }
-
- //-------------------------------------------
-
- // Evidence represents any provable malicious activity by a validator.
- type Evidence interface {
- Height() int64 // height of the equivocation
- Time() time.Time // time of the equivocation
- Address() []byte // address of the equivocating validator
- Bytes() []byte // bytes which comprise the evidence
- Hash() []byte // hash of the evidence
- Verify(chainID string, pubKey crypto.PubKey) error // verify the evidence
- Equal(Evidence) bool // check equality of evidence
-
- ValidateBasic() error
- String() string
- }
-
- type CompositeEvidence interface {
- VerifyComposite(committedHeader *Header, valSet *ValidatorSet) error
- Split(committedHeader *Header, valSet *ValidatorSet, valToLastHeight map[string]int64) []Evidence
- }
-
- func EvidenceToProto(evidence Evidence) (*tmproto.Evidence, error) {
- if evidence == nil {
- return nil, errors.New("nil evidence")
- }
-
- switch evi := evidence.(type) {
- case *DuplicateVoteEvidence:
- voteB := evi.VoteB.ToProto()
- voteA := evi.VoteA.ToProto()
- tp := &tmproto.Evidence{
- Sum: &tmproto.Evidence_DuplicateVoteEvidence{
- DuplicateVoteEvidence: &tmproto.DuplicateVoteEvidence{
- VoteA: voteA,
- VoteB: voteB,
- },
- },
- }
- return tp, nil
- case ConflictingHeadersEvidence:
- pbh1 := evi.H1.ToProto()
- pbh2 := evi.H2.ToProto()
-
- tp := &tmproto.Evidence{
- Sum: &tmproto.Evidence_ConflictingHeadersEvidence{
- ConflictingHeadersEvidence: &tmproto.ConflictingHeadersEvidence{
- H1: pbh1,
- H2: pbh2,
- },
- },
- }
-
- return tp, nil
- case *ConflictingHeadersEvidence:
- pbh1 := evi.H1.ToProto()
- pbh2 := evi.H2.ToProto()
-
- tp := &tmproto.Evidence{
- Sum: &tmproto.Evidence_ConflictingHeadersEvidence{
- ConflictingHeadersEvidence: &tmproto.ConflictingHeadersEvidence{
- H1: pbh1,
- H2: pbh2,
- },
- },
- }
-
- return tp, nil
- case *LunaticValidatorEvidence:
- h := evi.Header.ToProto()
- v := evi.Vote.ToProto()
-
- tp := &tmproto.Evidence{
- Sum: &tmproto.Evidence_LunaticValidatorEvidence{
- LunaticValidatorEvidence: &tmproto.LunaticValidatorEvidence{
- Header: h,
- Vote: v,
- InvalidHeaderField: evi.InvalidHeaderField,
- },
- },
- }
- return tp, nil
- case LunaticValidatorEvidence:
- h := evi.Header.ToProto()
- v := evi.Vote.ToProto()
-
- tp := &tmproto.Evidence{
- Sum: &tmproto.Evidence_LunaticValidatorEvidence{
- LunaticValidatorEvidence: &tmproto.LunaticValidatorEvidence{
- Header: h,
- Vote: v,
- InvalidHeaderField: evi.InvalidHeaderField,
- },
- },
- }
- return tp, nil
- case *PotentialAmnesiaEvidence:
- voteB := evi.VoteB.ToProto()
- voteA := evi.VoteA.ToProto()
-
- tp := &tmproto.Evidence{
- Sum: &tmproto.Evidence_PotentialAmnesiaEvidence{
- PotentialAmnesiaEvidence: &tmproto.PotentialAmnesiaEvidence{
- VoteA: voteA,
- VoteB: voteB,
- },
- },
- }
-
- return tp, nil
- case PotentialAmnesiaEvidence:
- voteB := evi.VoteB.ToProto()
- voteA := evi.VoteA.ToProto()
-
- tp := &tmproto.Evidence{
- Sum: &tmproto.Evidence_PotentialAmnesiaEvidence{
- PotentialAmnesiaEvidence: &tmproto.PotentialAmnesiaEvidence{
- VoteA: voteA,
- VoteB: voteB,
- },
- },
- }
-
- return tp, nil
- case MockEvidence:
- if err := evi.ValidateBasic(); err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
-
- tp := &tmproto.Evidence{
- Sum: &tmproto.Evidence_MockEvidence{
- MockEvidence: &tmproto.MockEvidence{
- EvidenceHeight: evi.Height(),
- EvidenceTime: evi.Time(),
- EvidenceAddress: evi.Address(),
- },
- },
- }
-
- return tp, nil
- case MockRandomEvidence:
- if err := evi.ValidateBasic(); err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
-
- tp := &tmproto.Evidence{
- Sum: &tmproto.Evidence_MockRandomEvidence{
- MockRandomEvidence: &tmproto.MockRandomEvidence{
- EvidenceHeight: evi.Height(),
- EvidenceTime: evi.Time(),
- EvidenceAddress: evi.Address(),
- RandBytes: evi.randBytes,
- },
- },
- }
- return tp, nil
- default:
- return nil, fmt.Errorf("toproto: evidence is not recognized: %T", evi)
- }
- }
-
- func EvidenceFromProto(evidence *tmproto.Evidence) (Evidence, error) {
- if evidence == nil {
- return nil, errors.New("nil evidence")
- }
-
- switch evi := evidence.Sum.(type) {
- case *tmproto.Evidence_DuplicateVoteEvidence:
-
- vA, err := VoteFromProto(evi.DuplicateVoteEvidence.VoteA)
- if err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
-
- vB, err := VoteFromProto(evi.DuplicateVoteEvidence.VoteB)
- if err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
-
- dve := DuplicateVoteEvidence{
- VoteA: vA,
- VoteB: vB,
- }
-
- return &dve, dve.ValidateBasic()
- case *tmproto.Evidence_ConflictingHeadersEvidence:
-
- h1, err := SignedHeaderFromProto(evi.ConflictingHeadersEvidence.H1)
- if err != nil {
- return nil, fmt.Errorf("from proto err: %w", err)
- }
- h2, err := SignedHeaderFromProto(evi.ConflictingHeadersEvidence.H2)
- if err != nil {
- return nil, fmt.Errorf("from proto err: %w", err)
- }
-
- tp := ConflictingHeadersEvidence{
- H1: h1,
- H2: h2,
- }
-
- return tp, tp.ValidateBasic()
- case *tmproto.Evidence_LunaticValidatorEvidence:
-
- h, err := HeaderFromProto(evi.LunaticValidatorEvidence.GetHeader())
- if err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
-
- v, err := VoteFromProto(evi.LunaticValidatorEvidence.GetVote())
- if err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
-
- tp := LunaticValidatorEvidence{
- Header: &h,
- Vote: v,
- InvalidHeaderField: evi.LunaticValidatorEvidence.InvalidHeaderField,
- }
-
- return &tp, tp.ValidateBasic()
- case *tmproto.Evidence_PotentialAmnesiaEvidence:
- voteA, err := VoteFromProto(evi.PotentialAmnesiaEvidence.GetVoteA())
- if err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
-
- voteB, err := VoteFromProto(evi.PotentialAmnesiaEvidence.GetVoteB())
- if err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
- tp := PotentialAmnesiaEvidence{
- VoteA: voteA,
- VoteB: voteB,
- }
-
- return &tp, tp.ValidateBasic()
- case *tmproto.Evidence_MockEvidence:
- me := MockEvidence{
- EvidenceHeight: evi.MockEvidence.GetEvidenceHeight(),
- EvidenceAddress: evi.MockEvidence.GetEvidenceAddress(),
- EvidenceTime: evi.MockEvidence.GetEvidenceTime(),
- }
- return me, me.ValidateBasic()
- case *tmproto.Evidence_MockRandomEvidence:
- mre := MockRandomEvidence{
- MockEvidence: MockEvidence{
- EvidenceHeight: evi.MockRandomEvidence.GetEvidenceHeight(),
- EvidenceAddress: evi.MockRandomEvidence.GetEvidenceAddress(),
- EvidenceTime: evi.MockRandomEvidence.GetEvidenceTime(),
- },
- randBytes: evi.MockRandomEvidence.RandBytes,
- }
- return mre, mre.ValidateBasic()
- default:
- return nil, errors.New("evidence is not recognized")
- }
- }
-
- func RegisterEvidences(cdc *amino.Codec) {
- cdc.RegisterInterface((*Evidence)(nil), nil)
- cdc.RegisterConcrete(&DuplicateVoteEvidence{}, "tendermint/DuplicateVoteEvidence", nil)
- cdc.RegisterConcrete(&ConflictingHeadersEvidence{}, "tendermint/ConflictingHeadersEvidence", nil)
- cdc.RegisterConcrete(&PhantomValidatorEvidence{}, "tendermint/PhantomValidatorEvidence", nil)
- cdc.RegisterConcrete(&LunaticValidatorEvidence{}, "tendermint/LunaticValidatorEvidence", nil)
- cdc.RegisterConcrete(&PotentialAmnesiaEvidence{}, "tendermint/PotentialAmnesiaEvidence", nil)
- }
-
- func init() {
- tmjson.RegisterType(&DuplicateVoteEvidence{}, "tendermint/DuplicateVoteEvidence")
- tmjson.RegisterType(&ConflictingHeadersEvidence{}, "tendermint/ConflictingHeadersEvidence")
- tmjson.RegisterType(&PhantomValidatorEvidence{}, "tendermint/PhantomValidatorEvidence")
- tmjson.RegisterType(&LunaticValidatorEvidence{}, "tendermint/LunaticValidatorEvidence")
- tmjson.RegisterType(&PotentialAmnesiaEvidence{}, "tendermint/PotentialAmnesiaEvidence")
- }
-
- func RegisterMockEvidences(cdc *amino.Codec) {
- cdc.RegisterConcrete(MockEvidence{}, "tendermint/MockEvidence", nil)
- cdc.RegisterConcrete(MockRandomEvidence{}, "tendermint/MockRandomEvidence", nil)
- }
-
- //-------------------------------------------
-
- // DuplicateVoteEvidence contains evidence a validator signed two conflicting
- // votes.
- type DuplicateVoteEvidence struct {
- VoteA *Vote `json:"vote_a"`
- VoteB *Vote `json:"vote_b"`
- }
-
- var _ Evidence = &DuplicateVoteEvidence{}
-
- // NewDuplicateVoteEvidence creates DuplicateVoteEvidence with right ordering given
- // two conflicting votes. If one of the votes is nil, evidence returned is nil as well
- func NewDuplicateVoteEvidence(vote1 *Vote, vote2 *Vote) *DuplicateVoteEvidence {
- var voteA, voteB *Vote
- if vote1 == nil || vote2 == nil {
- return nil
- }
- if strings.Compare(vote1.BlockID.Key(), vote2.BlockID.Key()) == -1 {
- voteA = vote1
- voteB = vote2
- } else {
- voteA = vote2
- voteB = vote1
- }
- return &DuplicateVoteEvidence{
- VoteA: voteA,
- VoteB: voteB,
- }
- }
-
- // String returns a string representation of the evidence.
- func (dve *DuplicateVoteEvidence) String() string {
- return fmt.Sprintf("DuplicateVoteEvidence{VoteA: %v, VoteB: %v}", dve.VoteA, dve.VoteB)
-
- }
-
- // Height returns the height this evidence refers to.
- func (dve *DuplicateVoteEvidence) Height() int64 {
- return dve.VoteA.Height
- }
-
- // Time returns the time the evidence was created.
- func (dve *DuplicateVoteEvidence) Time() time.Time {
- return dve.VoteA.Timestamp
- }
-
- // Address returns the address of the validator.
- func (dve *DuplicateVoteEvidence) Address() []byte {
- return dve.VoteA.ValidatorAddress
- }
-
- // Hash returns the hash of the evidence.
- func (dve *DuplicateVoteEvidence) Bytes() []byte {
- return cdcEncode(dve)
- }
-
- // Hash returns the hash of the evidence.
- func (dve *DuplicateVoteEvidence) Hash() []byte {
- return tmhash.Sum(cdcEncode(dve))
- }
-
- // Verify returns an error if the two votes aren't conflicting.
- //
- // To be conflicting, they must be from the same validator, for the same H/R/S,
- // but for different blocks.
- func (dve *DuplicateVoteEvidence) Verify(chainID string, pubKey crypto.PubKey) error {
- // H/R/S must be the same
- if dve.VoteA.Height != dve.VoteB.Height ||
- dve.VoteA.Round != dve.VoteB.Round ||
- dve.VoteA.Type != dve.VoteB.Type {
- return fmt.Errorf("h/r/s does not match: %d/%d/%v vs %d/%d/%v",
- dve.VoteA.Height, dve.VoteA.Round, dve.VoteA.Type,
- dve.VoteB.Height, dve.VoteB.Round, dve.VoteB.Type)
- }
-
- // Address must be the same
- if !bytes.Equal(dve.VoteA.ValidatorAddress, dve.VoteB.ValidatorAddress) {
- return fmt.Errorf("validator addresses do not match: %X vs %X",
- dve.VoteA.ValidatorAddress,
- dve.VoteB.ValidatorAddress,
- )
- }
-
- // Index must be the same
- if dve.VoteA.ValidatorIndex != dve.VoteB.ValidatorIndex {
- return fmt.Errorf(
- "validator indices do not match: %d and %d",
- dve.VoteA.ValidatorIndex,
- dve.VoteB.ValidatorIndex,
- )
- }
-
- // BlockIDs must be different
- if dve.VoteA.BlockID.Equals(dve.VoteB.BlockID) {
- return fmt.Errorf(
- "block IDs are the same (%v) - not a real duplicate vote",
- dve.VoteA.BlockID,
- )
- }
-
- // pubkey must match address (this should already be true, sanity check)
- addr := dve.VoteA.ValidatorAddress
- if !bytes.Equal(pubKey.Address(), addr) {
- return fmt.Errorf("address (%X) doesn't match pubkey (%v - %X)",
- addr, pubKey, pubKey.Address())
- }
-
- // Signatures must be valid
- if !pubKey.VerifyBytes(dve.VoteA.SignBytes(chainID), dve.VoteA.Signature) {
- return fmt.Errorf("verifying VoteA: %w", ErrVoteInvalidSignature)
- }
- if !pubKey.VerifyBytes(dve.VoteB.SignBytes(chainID), dve.VoteB.Signature) {
- return fmt.Errorf("verifying VoteB: %w", ErrVoteInvalidSignature)
- }
-
- return nil
- }
-
- // Equal checks if two pieces of evidence are equal.
- func (dve *DuplicateVoteEvidence) Equal(ev Evidence) bool {
- if _, ok := ev.(*DuplicateVoteEvidence); !ok {
- return false
- }
-
- // just check their hashes
- dveHash := tmhash.Sum(cdcEncode(dve))
- evHash := tmhash.Sum(cdcEncode(ev))
- fmt.Println(dveHash, evHash)
- return bytes.Equal(dveHash, evHash)
- }
-
- // ValidateBasic performs basic validation.
- func (dve *DuplicateVoteEvidence) ValidateBasic() error {
- if dve.VoteA == nil || dve.VoteB == nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("one or both of the votes are empty %v, %v", dve.VoteA, dve.VoteB)
- }
- if err := dve.VoteA.ValidateBasic(); err != nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("invalid VoteA: %w", err)
- }
- if err := dve.VoteB.ValidateBasic(); err != nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("invalid VoteB: %w", err)
- }
- // Enforce Votes are lexicographically sorted on blockID
- if strings.Compare(dve.VoteA.BlockID.Key(), dve.VoteB.BlockID.Key()) >= 0 {
- return errors.New("duplicate votes in invalid order")
- }
- return nil
- }
-
- //-------------------------------------------
-
- // EvidenceList is a list of Evidence. Evidences is not a word.
- type EvidenceList []Evidence
-
- // Hash returns the simple merkle root hash of the EvidenceList.
- func (evl EvidenceList) Hash() []byte {
- // These allocations are required because Evidence is not of type Bytes, and
- // golang slices can't be typed cast. This shouldn't be a performance problem since
- // the Evidence size is capped.
- evidenceBzs := make([][]byte, len(evl))
- for i := 0; i < len(evl); i++ {
- evidenceBzs[i] = evl[i].Bytes()
- }
- return merkle.SimpleHashFromByteSlices(evidenceBzs)
- }
-
- func (evl EvidenceList) String() string {
- s := ""
- for _, e := range evl {
- s += fmt.Sprintf("%s\t\t", e)
- }
- return s
- }
-
- // Has returns true if the evidence is in the EvidenceList.
- func (evl EvidenceList) Has(evidence Evidence) bool {
- for _, ev := range evl {
- if ev.Equal(evidence) {
- return true
- }
- }
- return false
- }
-
- //-------------------------------------------
-
- // ConflictingHeadersEvidence is primarily used by the light client when it
- // observes two conflicting headers, both having 1/3+ of the voting power of
- // the currently trusted validator set.
- type ConflictingHeadersEvidence struct {
- H1 *SignedHeader `json:"h_1"`
- H2 *SignedHeader `json:"h_2"`
- }
-
- var _ Evidence = ConflictingHeadersEvidence{}
- var _ CompositeEvidence = ConflictingHeadersEvidence{}
-
- // Split breaks up eviddence into smaller chunks (one per validator except for
- // PotentialAmnesiaEvidence): PhantomValidatorEvidence,
- // LunaticValidatorEvidence, DuplicateVoteEvidence and
- // PotentialAmnesiaEvidence.
- //
- // committedHeader - header at height H1.Height == H2.Height
- // valSet - validator set at height H1.Height == H2.Height
- // valToLastHeight - map between active validators and respective last heights
- func (ev ConflictingHeadersEvidence) Split(committedHeader *Header, valSet *ValidatorSet,
- valToLastHeight map[string]int64) []Evidence {
-
- evList := make([]Evidence, 0)
-
- var alternativeHeader *SignedHeader
- if bytes.Equal(committedHeader.Hash(), ev.H1.Hash()) {
- alternativeHeader = ev.H2
- } else {
- alternativeHeader = ev.H1
- }
-
- // If there are signers(alternativeHeader) that are not part of
- // validators(committedHeader), they misbehaved as they are signing protocol
- // messages in heights they are not validators => immediately slashable
- // (#F4).
- for i, sig := range alternativeHeader.Commit.Signatures {
- if sig.Absent() {
- continue
- }
-
- lastHeightValidatorWasInSet, ok := valToLastHeight[string(sig.ValidatorAddress)]
- if !ok {
- continue
- }
-
- if !valSet.HasAddress(sig.ValidatorAddress) {
- evList = append(evList, &PhantomValidatorEvidence{
- Vote: alternativeHeader.Commit.GetVote(int32(i)),
- LastHeightValidatorWasInSet: lastHeightValidatorWasInSet,
- })
- }
- }
-
- // If ValidatorsHash, NextValidatorsHash, ConsensusHash, AppHash, and
- // LastResultsHash in alternativeHeader are different (incorrect application
- // state transition), then it is a lunatic misbehavior => immediately
- // slashable (#F5).
- var invalidField string
- switch {
- case !bytes.Equal(committedHeader.ValidatorsHash, alternativeHeader.ValidatorsHash):
- invalidField = "ValidatorsHash"
- case !bytes.Equal(committedHeader.NextValidatorsHash, alternativeHeader.NextValidatorsHash):
- invalidField = "NextValidatorsHash"
- case !bytes.Equal(committedHeader.ConsensusHash, alternativeHeader.ConsensusHash):
- invalidField = "ConsensusHash"
- case !bytes.Equal(committedHeader.AppHash, alternativeHeader.AppHash):
- invalidField = "AppHash"
- case !bytes.Equal(committedHeader.LastResultsHash, alternativeHeader.LastResultsHash):
- invalidField = "LastResultsHash"
- }
- if invalidField != "" {
- for i, sig := range alternativeHeader.Commit.Signatures {
- if sig.Absent() {
- continue
- }
- evList = append(evList, &LunaticValidatorEvidence{
- Header: alternativeHeader.Header,
- Vote: alternativeHeader.Commit.GetVote(int32(i)),
- InvalidHeaderField: invalidField,
- })
- }
- return evList
- }
-
- // Use the fact that signatures are sorted by ValidatorAddress.
- var (
- i = 0
- j = 0
- )
- OUTER_LOOP:
- for i < len(ev.H1.Commit.Signatures) {
- sigA := ev.H1.Commit.Signatures[i]
- if sigA.Absent() {
- i++
- continue
- }
- // FIXME: Replace with HasAddress once DuplicateVoteEvidence#PubKey is
- // removed.
- _, val := valSet.GetByAddress(sigA.ValidatorAddress)
- if val == nil {
- i++
- continue
- }
-
- for j < len(ev.H2.Commit.Signatures) {
- sigB := ev.H2.Commit.Signatures[j]
- if sigB.Absent() {
- j++
- continue
- }
-
- switch bytes.Compare(sigA.ValidatorAddress, sigB.ValidatorAddress) {
- case 0:
- // if H1.Round == H2.Round, and some signers signed different precommit
- // messages in both commits, then it is an equivocation misbehavior =>
- // immediately slashable (#F1).
- if ev.H1.Commit.Round == ev.H2.Commit.Round {
- evList = append(evList, &DuplicateVoteEvidence{
- VoteA: ev.H1.Commit.GetVote(int32(i)),
- VoteB: ev.H2.Commit.GetVote(int32(j)),
- })
- } else {
- // if H1.Round != H2.Round we need to run full detection procedure => not
- // immediately slashable.
- evList = append(evList, &PotentialAmnesiaEvidence{
- VoteA: ev.H1.Commit.GetVote(int32(i)),
- VoteB: ev.H2.Commit.GetVote(int32(j)),
- })
- }
-
- i++
- j++
- continue OUTER_LOOP
- case 1:
- i++
- continue OUTER_LOOP
- case -1:
- j++
- }
- }
- }
-
- return evList
- }
-
- func (ev ConflictingHeadersEvidence) Height() int64 { return ev.H1.Height }
-
- // XXX: this is not the time of equivocation
- func (ev ConflictingHeadersEvidence) Time() time.Time { return ev.H1.Time }
-
- func (ev ConflictingHeadersEvidence) Address() []byte {
- panic("use ConflictingHeadersEvidence#Split to split evidence into individual pieces")
- }
-
- func (ev ConflictingHeadersEvidence) Bytes() []byte {
- return cdcEncode(ev)
- }
-
- func (ev ConflictingHeadersEvidence) Hash() []byte {
- bz := make([]byte, tmhash.Size*2)
- copy(bz[:tmhash.Size-1], ev.H1.Hash().Bytes())
- copy(bz[tmhash.Size:], ev.H2.Hash().Bytes())
- return tmhash.Sum(bz)
- }
-
- func (ev ConflictingHeadersEvidence) Verify(chainID string, _ crypto.PubKey) error {
- panic("use ConflictingHeadersEvidence#VerifyComposite to verify composite evidence")
- }
-
- // VerifyComposite verifies that both headers belong to the same chain, same
- // height and signed by 1/3+ of validators at height H1.Height == H2.Height.
- func (ev ConflictingHeadersEvidence) VerifyComposite(committedHeader *Header, valSet *ValidatorSet) error {
- var alternativeHeader *SignedHeader
- switch {
- case bytes.Equal(committedHeader.Hash(), ev.H1.Hash()):
- alternativeHeader = ev.H2
- case bytes.Equal(committedHeader.Hash(), ev.H2.Hash()):
- alternativeHeader = ev.H1
- default:
- return errors.New("none of the headers are committed from this node's perspective")
- }
-
- // ChainID must be the same
- if committedHeader.ChainID != alternativeHeader.ChainID {
- return errors.New("alt header is from a different chain")
- }
-
- // Height must be the same
- if committedHeader.Height != alternativeHeader.Height {
- return errors.New("alt header is from a different height")
- }
-
- // Limit the number of signatures to avoid DoS attacks where a header
- // contains too many signatures.
- //
- // Validator set size = 100 [node]
- // Max validator set size = 100 * 2 = 200 [fork?]
- maxNumValidators := valSet.Size() * 2
- if len(alternativeHeader.Commit.Signatures) > maxNumValidators {
- return fmt.Errorf("alt commit contains too many signatures: %d, expected no more than %d",
- len(alternativeHeader.Commit.Signatures),
- maxNumValidators)
- }
-
- // Header must be signed by at least 1/3+ of voting power of currently
- // trusted validator set.
- if err := valSet.VerifyCommitTrusting(
- alternativeHeader.ChainID,
- alternativeHeader.Commit,
- tmmath.Fraction{Numerator: 1, Denominator: 3}); err != nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("alt header does not have 1/3+ of voting power of our validator set: %w", err)
- }
-
- return nil
- }
-
- func (ev ConflictingHeadersEvidence) Equal(ev2 Evidence) bool {
- switch e2 := ev2.(type) {
- case ConflictingHeadersEvidence:
- return bytes.Equal(ev.H1.Hash(), e2.H1.Hash()) && bytes.Equal(ev.H2.Hash(), e2.H2.Hash())
- case *ConflictingHeadersEvidence:
- return bytes.Equal(ev.H1.Hash(), e2.H1.Hash()) && bytes.Equal(ev.H2.Hash(), e2.H2.Hash())
- default:
- return false
- }
- }
-
- func (ev ConflictingHeadersEvidence) ValidateBasic() error {
- if ev.H1 == nil {
- return errors.New("first header is missing")
- }
-
- if ev.H2 == nil {
- return errors.New("second header is missing")
- }
-
- if err := ev.H1.ValidateBasic(ev.H1.ChainID); err != nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("h1: %w", err)
- }
- if err := ev.H2.ValidateBasic(ev.H2.ChainID); err != nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("h2: %w", err)
- }
- return nil
- }
-
- func (ev ConflictingHeadersEvidence) String() string {
- return fmt.Sprintf("ConflictingHeadersEvidence{H1: %d#%X, H2: %d#%X}",
- ev.H1.Height, ev.H1.Hash(),
- ev.H2.Height, ev.H2.Hash())
- }
-
- //-------------------------------------------
-
- type PhantomValidatorEvidence struct {
- Vote *Vote `json:"vote"`
- LastHeightValidatorWasInSet int64 `json:"last_height_validator_was_in_set"`
- }
-
- var _ Evidence = PhantomValidatorEvidence{}
-
- func (e PhantomValidatorEvidence) Height() int64 {
- return e.Vote.Height
- }
-
- func (e PhantomValidatorEvidence) Time() time.Time {
- return e.Vote.Timestamp
- }
-
- func (e PhantomValidatorEvidence) Address() []byte {
- return e.Vote.ValidatorAddress
- }
-
- func (e PhantomValidatorEvidence) Hash() []byte {
- return tmhash.Sum(cdcEncode(e))
- }
-
- func (e PhantomValidatorEvidence) Bytes() []byte {
- return cdcEncode(e)
- }
-
- func (e PhantomValidatorEvidence) Verify(chainID string, pubKey crypto.PubKey) error {
-
- // signature must be verified to the chain ID
- if !pubKey.VerifyBytes(e.Vote.SignBytes(chainID), e.Vote.Signature) {
- return errors.New("invalid signature")
- }
-
- return nil
- }
-
- func (e PhantomValidatorEvidence) Equal(ev Evidence) bool {
- switch e2 := ev.(type) {
- case PhantomValidatorEvidence:
- return e.Vote.Height == e2.Vote.Height &&
- bytes.Equal(e.Vote.ValidatorAddress, e2.Vote.ValidatorAddress)
- case *PhantomValidatorEvidence:
- return e.Vote.Height == e2.Vote.Height &&
- bytes.Equal(e.Vote.ValidatorAddress, e2.Vote.ValidatorAddress)
- default:
- return false
- }
- }
-
- func (e PhantomValidatorEvidence) ValidateBasic() error {
-
- if e.Vote == nil {
- return errors.New("empty vote")
- }
-
- if err := e.Vote.ValidateBasic(); err != nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("invalid signature: %v", err)
- }
-
- if !e.Vote.BlockID.IsComplete() {
- return errors.New("expected vote for block")
- }
-
- if e.LastHeightValidatorWasInSet <= 0 {
- return errors.New("negative or zero LastHeightValidatorWasInSet")
- }
-
- return nil
- }
-
- func (e PhantomValidatorEvidence) String() string {
- return fmt.Sprintf("PhantomValidatorEvidence{%X voted at height %d}",
- e.Vote.ValidatorAddress, e.Vote.Height)
- }
-
- //-------------------------------------------
-
- type LunaticValidatorEvidence struct {
- Header *Header `json:"header"`
- Vote *Vote `json:"vote"`
- InvalidHeaderField string `json:"invalid_header_field"`
- }
-
- var _ Evidence = LunaticValidatorEvidence{}
-
- func (e LunaticValidatorEvidence) Height() int64 {
- return e.Header.Height
- }
-
- func (e LunaticValidatorEvidence) Time() time.Time {
- return e.Header.Time
- }
-
- func (e LunaticValidatorEvidence) Address() []byte {
- return e.Vote.ValidatorAddress
- }
-
- func (e LunaticValidatorEvidence) Hash() []byte {
- bz := make([]byte, tmhash.Size+crypto.AddressSize)
- copy(bz[:tmhash.Size-1], e.Header.Hash().Bytes())
- copy(bz[tmhash.Size:], e.Vote.ValidatorAddress.Bytes())
- return tmhash.Sum(bz)
- }
-
- func (e LunaticValidatorEvidence) Bytes() []byte {
- return cdcEncode(e)
- }
-
- func (e LunaticValidatorEvidence) Verify(chainID string, pubKey crypto.PubKey) error {
- // chainID must be the same
- if chainID != e.Header.ChainID {
- return fmt.Errorf("chainID do not match: %s vs %s",
- chainID,
- e.Header.ChainID,
- )
- }
-
- if !pubKey.VerifyBytes(e.Vote.SignBytes(chainID), e.Vote.Signature) {
- return errors.New("invalid signature")
- }
-
- return nil
- }
-
- func (e LunaticValidatorEvidence) Equal(ev Evidence) bool {
- switch e2 := ev.(type) {
- case LunaticValidatorEvidence:
- return bytes.Equal(e.Header.Hash(), e2.Header.Hash()) &&
- bytes.Equal(e.Vote.ValidatorAddress, e2.Vote.ValidatorAddress)
- case *LunaticValidatorEvidence:
- return bytes.Equal(e.Header.Hash(), e2.Header.Hash()) &&
- bytes.Equal(e.Vote.ValidatorAddress, e2.Vote.ValidatorAddress)
- default:
- return false
- }
- }
-
- func (e LunaticValidatorEvidence) ValidateBasic() error {
- if e.Header == nil {
- return errors.New("empty header")
- }
-
- if e.Vote == nil {
- return errors.New("empty vote")
- }
-
- if err := e.Header.ValidateBasic(); err != nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("invalid header: %v", err)
- }
-
- if err := e.Vote.ValidateBasic(); err != nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("invalid signature: %v", err)
- }
-
- if !e.Vote.BlockID.IsComplete() {
- return errors.New("expected vote for block")
- }
-
- if e.Header.Height != e.Vote.Height {
- return fmt.Errorf("header and vote have different heights: %d vs %d",
- e.Header.Height,
- e.Vote.Height,
- )
- }
-
- switch e.InvalidHeaderField {
- case "ValidatorsHash", "NextValidatorsHash", "ConsensusHash", "AppHash", "LastResultsHash":
- return nil
- default:
- return errors.New("unknown invalid header field")
- }
- }
-
- func (e LunaticValidatorEvidence) String() string {
- return fmt.Sprintf("LunaticValidatorEvidence{%X voted for %d/%X, which contains invalid %s}",
- e.Vote.ValidatorAddress, e.Header.Height, e.Header.Hash(), e.InvalidHeaderField)
- }
-
- func (e LunaticValidatorEvidence) VerifyHeader(committedHeader *Header) error {
- matchErr := func(field string) error {
- return fmt.Errorf("%s matches committed hash", field)
- }
-
- if committedHeader == nil {
- return errors.New("committed header is nil")
- }
-
- switch e.InvalidHeaderField {
- case ValidatorsHashField:
- if bytes.Equal(committedHeader.ValidatorsHash, e.Header.ValidatorsHash) {
- return matchErr(ValidatorsHashField)
- }
- case NextValidatorsHashField:
- if bytes.Equal(committedHeader.NextValidatorsHash, e.Header.NextValidatorsHash) {
- return matchErr(NextValidatorsHashField)
- }
- case ConsensusHashField:
- if bytes.Equal(committedHeader.ConsensusHash, e.Header.ConsensusHash) {
- return matchErr(ConsensusHashField)
- }
- case AppHashField:
- if bytes.Equal(committedHeader.AppHash, e.Header.AppHash) {
- return matchErr(AppHashField)
- }
- case LastResultsHashField:
- if bytes.Equal(committedHeader.LastResultsHash, e.Header.LastResultsHash) {
- return matchErr(LastResultsHashField)
- }
- default:
- return errors.New("unknown InvalidHeaderField")
- }
-
- return nil
- }
-
- //-------------------------------------------
-
- type PotentialAmnesiaEvidence struct {
- VoteA *Vote `json:"vote_a"`
- VoteB *Vote `json:"vote_b"`
- }
-
- var _ Evidence = PotentialAmnesiaEvidence{}
-
- func (e PotentialAmnesiaEvidence) Height() int64 {
- return e.VoteA.Height
- }
-
- func (e PotentialAmnesiaEvidence) Time() time.Time {
- if e.VoteA.Timestamp.Before(e.VoteB.Timestamp) {
- return e.VoteA.Timestamp
- }
- return e.VoteB.Timestamp
- }
-
- func (e PotentialAmnesiaEvidence) Address() []byte {
- return e.VoteA.ValidatorAddress
- }
-
- func (e PotentialAmnesiaEvidence) Hash() []byte {
- return tmhash.Sum(cdcEncode(e))
- }
-
- func (e PotentialAmnesiaEvidence) Bytes() []byte {
- return cdcEncode(e)
- }
-
- func (e PotentialAmnesiaEvidence) Verify(chainID string, pubKey crypto.PubKey) error {
- // pubkey must match address (this should already be true, sanity check)
- addr := e.VoteA.ValidatorAddress
- if !bytes.Equal(pubKey.Address(), addr) {
- return fmt.Errorf("address (%X) doesn't match pubkey (%v - %X)",
- addr, pubKey, pubKey.Address())
- }
-
- // Signatures must be valid
- if !pubKey.VerifyBytes(e.VoteA.SignBytes(chainID), e.VoteA.Signature) {
- return fmt.Errorf("verifying VoteA: %w", ErrVoteInvalidSignature)
- }
- if !pubKey.VerifyBytes(e.VoteB.SignBytes(chainID), e.VoteB.Signature) {
- return fmt.Errorf("verifying VoteB: %w", ErrVoteInvalidSignature)
- }
-
- return nil
- }
-
- func (e PotentialAmnesiaEvidence) Equal(ev Evidence) bool {
- switch e2 := ev.(type) {
- case PotentialAmnesiaEvidence:
- return bytes.Equal(e.Hash(), e2.Hash())
- case *PotentialAmnesiaEvidence:
- return bytes.Equal(e.Hash(), e2.Hash())
- default:
- return false
- }
- }
-
- func (e PotentialAmnesiaEvidence) ValidateBasic() error {
- if e.VoteA == nil || e.VoteB == nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("one or both of the votes are empty %v, %v", e.VoteA, e.VoteB)
- }
- if err := e.VoteA.ValidateBasic(); err != nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("invalid VoteA: %v", err)
- }
- if err := e.VoteB.ValidateBasic(); err != nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("invalid VoteB: %v", err)
- }
- // Enforce Votes are lexicographically sorted on blockID
- if strings.Compare(e.VoteA.BlockID.Key(), e.VoteB.BlockID.Key()) >= 0 {
- return errors.New("amnesia votes in invalid order")
- }
-
- // H/S must be the same
- if e.VoteA.Height != e.VoteB.Height ||
- e.VoteA.Type != e.VoteB.Type {
- return fmt.Errorf("h/s do not match: %d/%v vs %d/%v",
- e.VoteA.Height, e.VoteA.Type, e.VoteB.Height, e.VoteB.Type)
- }
-
- // R must be different
- if e.VoteA.Round == e.VoteB.Round {
- return fmt.Errorf("expected votes from different rounds, got %d", e.VoteA.Round)
- }
-
- // Address must be the same
- if !bytes.Equal(e.VoteA.ValidatorAddress, e.VoteB.ValidatorAddress) {
- return fmt.Errorf("validator addresses do not match: %X vs %X",
- e.VoteA.ValidatorAddress,
- e.VoteB.ValidatorAddress,
- )
- }
-
- // Index must be the same
- // https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/issues/4619
- if e.VoteA.ValidatorIndex != e.VoteB.ValidatorIndex {
- return fmt.Errorf(
- "duplicateVoteEvidence Error: Validator indices do not match. Got %d and %d",
- e.VoteA.ValidatorIndex,
- e.VoteB.ValidatorIndex,
- )
- }
-
- // BlockIDs must be different
- if e.VoteA.BlockID.Equals(e.VoteB.BlockID) {
- return fmt.Errorf(
- "block IDs are the same (%v) - not a real duplicate vote",
- e.VoteA.BlockID,
- )
- }
-
- return nil
- }
-
- func (e PotentialAmnesiaEvidence) String() string {
- return fmt.Sprintf("PotentialAmnesiaEvidence{VoteA: %v, VoteB: %v}", e.VoteA, e.VoteB)
- }
-
- // ProofOfLockChange (POLC) proves that a node followed the consensus protocol and voted for a precommit in two
- // different rounds because the node received a majority of votes for a different block in the latter round. In cases of
- // amnesia evidence, a suspected node will need ProofOfLockChange to prove that the node did not break protocol.
- type ProofOfLockChange struct {
- Votes []Vote `json:"votes"`
- PubKey crypto.PubKey `json:"pubkey"`
- }
-
- // MakePOLCFromVoteSet can be used when a majority of prevotes or precommits for a block is seen
- // that the node has itself not yet voted for in order to process the vote set into a proof of lock change
- func MakePOLCFromVoteSet(voteSet *VoteSet, pubKey crypto.PubKey, blockID BlockID) (ProofOfLockChange, error) {
- polc := makePOLCFromVoteSet(voteSet, pubKey, blockID)
- return polc, polc.ValidateBasic()
- }
-
- func makePOLCFromVoteSet(voteSet *VoteSet, pubKey crypto.PubKey, blockID BlockID) ProofOfLockChange {
- var votes []Vote
- valSetSize := voteSet.Size()
- for valIdx := int32(0); int(valIdx) < valSetSize; valIdx++ {
- vote := voteSet.GetByIndex(valIdx)
- if vote != nil && vote.BlockID.Equals(blockID) {
- votes = append(votes, *vote)
- }
- }
- return ProofOfLockChange{
- Votes: votes,
- PubKey: pubKey,
- }
- }
-
- func (e ProofOfLockChange) Height() int64 {
- return e.Votes[0].Height
- }
-
- // returns the time of the last vote
- func (e ProofOfLockChange) Time() time.Time {
- latest := e.Votes[0].Timestamp
- for _, vote := range e.Votes {
- if vote.Timestamp.After(latest) {
- latest = vote.Timestamp
- }
- }
- return latest
- }
-
- func (e ProofOfLockChange) Round() int32 {
- return e.Votes[0].Round
- }
-
- func (e ProofOfLockChange) Address() []byte {
- return e.PubKey.Address()
- }
-
- func (e ProofOfLockChange) BlockID() BlockID {
- return e.Votes[0].BlockID
- }
-
- // In order for a ProofOfLockChange to be valid, a validator must have received +2/3 majority of votes
- // MajorityOfVotes checks that there were sufficient votes in order to change locks
- func (e ProofOfLockChange) MajorityOfVotes(valSet *ValidatorSet) bool {
- talliedVotingPower := int64(0)
- votingPowerNeeded := valSet.TotalVotingPower() * 2 / 3
- for _, validator := range valSet.Validators {
- for _, vote := range e.Votes {
- if bytes.Equal(validator.Address, vote.ValidatorAddress) {
- talliedVotingPower += validator.VotingPower
-
- if talliedVotingPower > votingPowerNeeded {
- return true
- }
- }
- }
- }
- return false
- }
-
- func (e ProofOfLockChange) Equal(e2 ProofOfLockChange) bool {
- return bytes.Equal(e.Address(), e2.Address()) && e.Height() == e2.Height() &&
- e.Round() == e2.Round()
- }
-
- func (e ProofOfLockChange) ValidateBasic() error {
- if e.PubKey == nil {
- return errors.New("missing public key")
- }
- // validate basic doesn't count the number of votes and their voting power, this is to be done by VerifyEvidence
- if e.Votes == nil {
- return errors.New("missing votes")
- }
- // height, round and vote type must be the same for all votes
- height := e.Height()
- round := e.Round()
- if round == 0 {
- return errors.New("can't have a polc for the first round")
- }
- voteType := e.Votes[0].Type
- for idx, vote := range e.Votes {
- if err := vote.ValidateBasic(); err != nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("invalid vote#%d: %w", idx, err)
- }
-
- if vote.Height != height {
- return fmt.Errorf("invalid height for vote#%d: %d instead of %d", idx, vote.Height, height)
- }
-
- if vote.Round != round {
- return fmt.Errorf("invalid round for vote#%d: %d instead of %d", idx, vote.Round, round)
- }
-
- if vote.Type != voteType {
- return fmt.Errorf("invalid vote type for vote#%d: %d instead of %d", idx, vote.Type, voteType)
- }
-
- if !vote.BlockID.Equals(e.BlockID()) {
- return fmt.Errorf("vote must be for the same block id: %v instead of %v", e.BlockID(), vote.BlockID)
- }
-
- if bytes.Equal(vote.ValidatorAddress.Bytes(), e.PubKey.Address().Bytes()) {
- return fmt.Errorf("vote validator address cannot be the same as the public key address: %X all votes %v",
- vote.ValidatorAddress.Bytes(), e.Votes)
- }
-
- for i := idx + 1; i < len(e.Votes); i++ {
- if bytes.Equal(vote.ValidatorAddress.Bytes(), e.Votes[i].ValidatorAddress.Bytes()) {
- return fmt.Errorf("duplicate votes: %v", vote)
- }
- }
-
- }
- return nil
- }
-
- func (e ProofOfLockChange) String() string {
- return fmt.Sprintf("ProofOfLockChange {Address: %X, Height: %d, Round: %d", e.Address(), e.Height(),
- e.Votes[0].Round)
- }
-
- func (e *ProofOfLockChange) ToProto() (*tmproto.ProofOfLockChange, error) {
- if e == nil {
- return nil, errors.New("nil proof of lock change")
- }
- plc := new(tmproto.ProofOfLockChange)
- vpb := make([]*tmproto.Vote, len(e.Votes))
-
- for i, v := range e.Votes {
- pb := v.ToProto()
- if pb != nil {
- vpb[i] = pb
- }
- }
-
- pk, err := cryptoenc.PubKeyToProto(e.PubKey)
- if err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
- plc.PubKey = &pk
- plc.Votes = vpb
-
- return plc, nil
- }
-
- func ProofOfLockChangeFromProto(pb *tmproto.ProofOfLockChange) (*ProofOfLockChange, error) {
- if pb == nil {
- return nil, errors.New("nil proof of lock change")
- }
-
- plc := new(ProofOfLockChange)
- vpb := make([]Vote, len(pb.Votes))
- for i, v := range pb.Votes {
- vi, err := VoteFromProto(v)
- if err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
- vpb[i] = *vi
- }
-
- if pb.PubKey == nil {
- return nil, errors.New("proofOfLockChange: nil PubKey")
- }
- pk, err := cryptoenc.PubKeyFromProto(*pb.PubKey)
- if err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
-
- plc.PubKey = pk
- plc.Votes = vpb
-
- return plc, nil
- }
-
- //-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
- // UNSTABLE
- type MockRandomEvidence struct {
- MockEvidence
- randBytes []byte
- }
-
- var _ Evidence = &MockRandomEvidence{}
-
- // UNSTABLE
- func NewMockRandomEvidence(height int64, eTime time.Time, address []byte, randBytes []byte) MockRandomEvidence {
- return MockRandomEvidence{
- MockEvidence{
- EvidenceHeight: height,
- EvidenceTime: eTime,
- EvidenceAddress: address}, randBytes,
- }
- }
-
- func (e MockRandomEvidence) Hash() []byte {
- return []byte(fmt.Sprintf("%d-%x", e.EvidenceHeight, e.randBytes))
- }
-
- func (e MockRandomEvidence) Equal(ev Evidence) bool { return false }
-
- // UNSTABLE
- type MockEvidence struct {
- EvidenceHeight int64
- EvidenceTime time.Time
- EvidenceAddress []byte
- }
-
- var _ Evidence = &MockEvidence{}
-
- // UNSTABLE
- func NewMockEvidence(height int64, eTime time.Time, address []byte) MockEvidence {
- return MockEvidence{
- EvidenceHeight: height,
- EvidenceTime: eTime,
- EvidenceAddress: address,
- }
- }
-
- func (e MockEvidence) Height() int64 { return e.EvidenceHeight }
- func (e MockEvidence) Time() time.Time { return e.EvidenceTime }
- func (e MockEvidence) Address() []byte { return e.EvidenceAddress }
- func (e MockEvidence) Hash() []byte {
- return []byte(fmt.Sprintf("%d-%x-%s",
- e.EvidenceHeight, e.EvidenceAddress, e.EvidenceTime))
- }
- func (e MockEvidence) Bytes() []byte {
- return []byte(fmt.Sprintf("%d-%x-%s",
- e.EvidenceHeight, e.EvidenceAddress, e.EvidenceTime))
- }
- func (e MockEvidence) Verify(chainID string, pubKey crypto.PubKey) error { return nil }
- func (e MockEvidence) Equal(ev Evidence) bool {
- return e.EvidenceHeight == ev.Height() &&
- bytes.Equal(e.EvidenceAddress, ev.Address())
- }
- func (e MockEvidence) ValidateBasic() error { return nil }
- func (e MockEvidence) String() string {
- return fmt.Sprintf("Evidence: %d/%s/%s", e.EvidenceHeight, e.Time(), e.EvidenceAddress)
- }
-
- // mock polc - fails validate basic, not stable
- func NewMockPOLC(height int64, time time.Time, pubKey crypto.PubKey) ProofOfLockChange {
- voteVal := NewMockPV()
- pKey, _ := voteVal.GetPubKey()
- vote := Vote{Type: tmproto.PrecommitType, Height: height, Round: 1, BlockID: BlockID{},
- Timestamp: time, ValidatorAddress: pKey.Address(), ValidatorIndex: 1, Signature: []byte{}}
- _ = voteVal.SignVote("mock-chain-id", &vote)
- return ProofOfLockChange{
- Votes: []Vote{vote},
- PubKey: pubKey,
- }
- }
|