You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

276 lines
8.1 KiB

rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
cleanup: Reduce and normalize import path aliasing. (#6975) The code in the Tendermint repository makes heavy use of import aliasing. This is made necessary by our extensive reuse of common base package names, and by repetition of similar names across different subdirectories. Unfortunately we have not been very consistent about which packages we alias in various circumstances, and the aliases we use vary. In the spirit of the advice in the style guide and https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments#imports, his change makes an effort to clean up and normalize import aliasing. This change makes no API or behavioral changes. It is a pure cleanup intended o help make the code more readable to developers (including myself) trying to understand what is being imported where. Only unexported names have been modified, and the changes were generated and applied mechanically with gofmt -r and comby, respecting the lexical and syntactic rules of Go. Even so, I did not fix every inconsistency. Where the changes would be too disruptive, I left it alone. The principles I followed in this cleanup are: - Remove aliases that restate the package name. - Remove aliases where the base package name is unambiguous. - Move overly-terse abbreviations from the import to the usage site. - Fix lexical issues (remove underscores, remove capitalization). - Fix import groupings to more closely match the style guide. - Group blank (side-effecting) imports and ensure they are commented. - Add aliases to multiple imports with the same base package name.
3 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
cleanup: Reduce and normalize import path aliasing. (#6975) The code in the Tendermint repository makes heavy use of import aliasing. This is made necessary by our extensive reuse of common base package names, and by repetition of similar names across different subdirectories. Unfortunately we have not been very consistent about which packages we alias in various circumstances, and the aliases we use vary. In the spirit of the advice in the style guide and https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments#imports, his change makes an effort to clean up and normalize import aliasing. This change makes no API or behavioral changes. It is a pure cleanup intended o help make the code more readable to developers (including myself) trying to understand what is being imported where. Only unexported names have been modified, and the changes were generated and applied mechanically with gofmt -r and comby, respecting the lexical and syntactic rules of Go. Even so, I did not fix every inconsistency. Where the changes would be too disruptive, I left it alone. The principles I followed in this cleanup are: - Remove aliases that restate the package name. - Remove aliases where the base package name is unambiguous. - Move overly-terse abbreviations from the import to the usage site. - Fix lexical issues (remove underscores, remove capitalization). - Fix import groupings to more closely match the style guide. - Group blank (side-effecting) imports and ensure they are commented. - Add aliases to multiple imports with the same base package name.
3 years ago
cleanup: Reduce and normalize import path aliasing. (#6975) The code in the Tendermint repository makes heavy use of import aliasing. This is made necessary by our extensive reuse of common base package names, and by repetition of similar names across different subdirectories. Unfortunately we have not been very consistent about which packages we alias in various circumstances, and the aliases we use vary. In the spirit of the advice in the style guide and https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments#imports, his change makes an effort to clean up and normalize import aliasing. This change makes no API or behavioral changes. It is a pure cleanup intended o help make the code more readable to developers (including myself) trying to understand what is being imported where. Only unexported names have been modified, and the changes were generated and applied mechanically with gofmt -r and comby, respecting the lexical and syntactic rules of Go. Even so, I did not fix every inconsistency. Where the changes would be too disruptive, I left it alone. The principles I followed in this cleanup are: - Remove aliases that restate the package name. - Remove aliases where the base package name is unambiguous. - Move overly-terse abbreviations from the import to the usage site. - Fix lexical issues (remove underscores, remove capitalization). - Fix import groupings to more closely match the style guide. - Group blank (side-effecting) imports and ensure they are commented. - Add aliases to multiple imports with the same base package name.
3 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
  1. package server
  2. import (
  3. "bytes"
  4. "context"
  5. "encoding/json"
  6. "errors"
  7. "fmt"
  8. "io"
  9. "net/http"
  10. "reflect"
  11. "sort"
  12. "strconv"
  13. "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/log"
  14. "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/rpc/coretypes"
  15. rpctypes "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/rpc/jsonrpc/types"
  16. )
  17. // HTTP + JSON handler
  18. // jsonrpc calls grab the given method's function info and runs reflect.Call
  19. func makeJSONRPCHandler(funcMap map[string]*RPCFunc, logger log.Logger) http.HandlerFunc {
  20. return func(w http.ResponseWriter, hreq *http.Request) {
  21. // For POST requests, reject a non-root URL path. This should not happen
  22. // in the standard configuration, since the wrapper checks the path.
  23. if hreq.URL.Path != "/" {
  24. writeRPCResponse(w, logger, rpctypes.RPCInvalidRequestError(
  25. nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid path: %q", hreq.URL.Path)))
  26. return
  27. }
  28. b, err := io.ReadAll(hreq.Body)
  29. if err != nil {
  30. writeRPCResponse(w, logger, rpctypes.RPCInvalidRequestError(
  31. nil, fmt.Errorf("reading request body: %w", err)))
  32. return
  33. }
  34. // if its an empty request (like from a browser), just display a list of
  35. // functions
  36. if len(b) == 0 {
  37. writeListOfEndpoints(w, hreq, funcMap)
  38. return
  39. }
  40. requests, err := parseRequests(b)
  41. if err != nil {
  42. writeRPCResponse(w, logger, rpctypes.RPCParseError(fmt.Errorf("decoding request: %w", err)))
  43. return
  44. }
  45. var responses []rpctypes.RPCResponse
  46. for _, req := range requests {
  47. // Ignore notifications, which this service does not support.
  48. if req.ID == nil {
  49. logger.Debug("Ignoring notification", "req", req)
  50. continue
  51. }
  52. rpcFunc, ok := funcMap[req.Method]
  53. if !ok || rpcFunc.ws {
  54. responses = append(responses, rpctypes.RPCMethodNotFoundError(req.ID))
  55. continue
  56. }
  57. req := req
  58. ctx := rpctypes.WithCallInfo(hreq.Context(), &rpctypes.CallInfo{
  59. RPCRequest: &req,
  60. HTTPRequest: hreq,
  61. })
  62. args, err := parseParams(ctx, rpcFunc, req.Params)
  63. if err != nil {
  64. responses = append(responses, rpctypes.RPCInvalidParamsError(
  65. req.ID, fmt.Errorf("converting JSON parameters: %w", err)))
  66. continue
  67. }
  68. returns := rpcFunc.f.Call(args)
  69. logger.Debug("HTTPJSONRPC", "method", req.Method, "args", args, "returns", returns)
  70. result, err := unreflectResult(returns)
  71. switch e := err.(type) {
  72. // if no error then return a success response
  73. case nil:
  74. responses = append(responses, rpctypes.NewRPCSuccessResponse(req.ID, result))
  75. // if this already of type RPC error then forward that error
  76. case *rpctypes.RPCError:
  77. responses = append(responses, rpctypes.NewRPCErrorResponse(req.ID, e.Code, e.Message, e.Data))
  78. default: // we need to unwrap the error and parse it accordingly
  79. switch errors.Unwrap(err) {
  80. // check if the error was due to an invald request
  81. case coretypes.ErrZeroOrNegativeHeight, coretypes.ErrZeroOrNegativePerPage,
  82. coretypes.ErrPageOutOfRange, coretypes.ErrInvalidRequest:
  83. responses = append(responses, rpctypes.RPCInvalidRequestError(req.ID, err))
  84. // lastly default all remaining errors as internal errors
  85. default: // includes ctypes.ErrHeightNotAvailable and ctypes.ErrHeightExceedsChainHead
  86. responses = append(responses, rpctypes.RPCInternalError(req.ID, err))
  87. }
  88. }
  89. }
  90. if len(responses) == 0 {
  91. return
  92. }
  93. writeRPCResponse(w, logger, responses...)
  94. }
  95. }
  96. func handleInvalidJSONRPCPaths(next http.HandlerFunc) http.HandlerFunc {
  97. return func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
  98. // Since the pattern "/" matches all paths not matched by other registered patterns,
  99. // we check whether the path is indeed "/", otherwise return a 404 error
  100. if r.URL.Path != "/" {
  101. http.NotFound(w, r)
  102. return
  103. }
  104. next(w, r)
  105. }
  106. }
  107. // parseRequests parses a JSON-RPC request or request batch from data.
  108. func parseRequests(data []byte) ([]rpctypes.RPCRequest, error) {
  109. var reqs []rpctypes.RPCRequest
  110. var err error
  111. isArray := bytes.HasPrefix(bytes.TrimSpace(data), []byte("["))
  112. if isArray {
  113. err = json.Unmarshal(data, &reqs)
  114. } else {
  115. reqs = append(reqs, rpctypes.RPCRequest{})
  116. err = json.Unmarshal(data, &reqs[0])
  117. }
  118. if err != nil {
  119. return nil, err
  120. }
  121. return reqs, nil
  122. }
  123. // parseParams parses the JSON parameters of rpcReq into the arguments of fn,
  124. // returning the corresponding argument values or an error.
  125. func parseParams(ctx context.Context, fn *RPCFunc, paramData []byte) ([]reflect.Value, error) {
  126. params, err := parseJSONParams(fn, paramData)
  127. if err != nil {
  128. return nil, err
  129. }
  130. args := make([]reflect.Value, 1+len(params))
  131. args[0] = reflect.ValueOf(ctx)
  132. for i, param := range params {
  133. ptype := fn.args[i+1]
  134. if len(param) == 0 {
  135. args[i+1] = reflect.Zero(ptype)
  136. continue
  137. }
  138. var pval reflect.Value
  139. isPtr := ptype.Kind() == reflect.Ptr
  140. if isPtr {
  141. pval = reflect.New(ptype.Elem())
  142. } else {
  143. pval = reflect.New(ptype)
  144. }
  145. baseType := pval.Type().Elem()
  146. if isIntType(baseType) && isStringValue(param) {
  147. var z int64String
  148. if err := json.Unmarshal(param, &z); err != nil {
  149. return nil, fmt.Errorf("decoding string %q: %w", fn.argNames[i], err)
  150. }
  151. pval.Elem().Set(reflect.ValueOf(z).Convert(baseType))
  152. } else if err := json.Unmarshal(param, pval.Interface()); err != nil {
  153. return nil, fmt.Errorf("decoding %q: %w", fn.argNames[i], err)
  154. }
  155. if isPtr {
  156. args[i+1] = pval
  157. } else {
  158. args[i+1] = pval.Elem()
  159. }
  160. }
  161. return args, nil
  162. }
  163. // parseJSONParams parses data and returns a slice of JSON values matching the
  164. // positional parameters of fn. It reports an error if data is not "null" and
  165. // does not encode an object or an array, or if the number of array parameters
  166. // does not match the argument list of fn (excluding the context).
  167. func parseJSONParams(fn *RPCFunc, data []byte) ([]json.RawMessage, error) {
  168. base := bytes.TrimSpace(data)
  169. if bytes.HasPrefix(base, []byte("{")) {
  170. var m map[string]json.RawMessage
  171. if err := json.Unmarshal(base, &m); err != nil {
  172. return nil, fmt.Errorf("decoding parameter object: %w", err)
  173. }
  174. out := make([]json.RawMessage, len(fn.argNames))
  175. for i, name := range fn.argNames {
  176. if p, ok := m[name]; ok {
  177. out[i] = p
  178. }
  179. }
  180. return out, nil
  181. } else if bytes.HasPrefix(base, []byte("[")) {
  182. var m []json.RawMessage
  183. if err := json.Unmarshal(base, &m); err != nil {
  184. return nil, fmt.Errorf("decoding parameter array: %w", err)
  185. }
  186. if len(m) != len(fn.argNames) {
  187. return nil, fmt.Errorf("got %d parameters, want %d", len(m), len(fn.argNames))
  188. }
  189. return m, nil
  190. } else if bytes.Equal(base, []byte("null")) {
  191. return make([]json.RawMessage, len(fn.argNames)), nil
  192. }
  193. return nil, errors.New("parameters must be an object or an array")
  194. }
  195. // isStringValue reports whether data is a JSON string value.
  196. func isStringValue(data json.RawMessage) bool {
  197. return len(data) != 0 && data[0] == '"'
  198. }
  199. type int64String int64
  200. func (z *int64String) UnmarshalText(data []byte) error {
  201. v, err := strconv.ParseInt(string(data), 10, 64)
  202. if err != nil {
  203. return err
  204. }
  205. *z = int64String(v)
  206. return nil
  207. }
  208. // writes a list of available rpc endpoints as an html page
  209. func writeListOfEndpoints(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, funcMap map[string]*RPCFunc) {
  210. noArgNames := []string{}
  211. argNames := []string{}
  212. for name, funcData := range funcMap {
  213. if len(funcData.args) == 0 {
  214. noArgNames = append(noArgNames, name)
  215. } else {
  216. argNames = append(argNames, name)
  217. }
  218. }
  219. sort.Strings(noArgNames)
  220. sort.Strings(argNames)
  221. buf := new(bytes.Buffer)
  222. buf.WriteString("<html><body>")
  223. buf.WriteString("<br>Available endpoints:<br>")
  224. for _, name := range noArgNames {
  225. link := fmt.Sprintf("//%s/%s", r.Host, name)
  226. buf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("<a href=\"%s\">%s</a></br>", link, link))
  227. }
  228. buf.WriteString("<br>Endpoints that require arguments:<br>")
  229. for _, name := range argNames {
  230. link := fmt.Sprintf("//%s/%s?", r.Host, name)
  231. funcData := funcMap[name]
  232. for i, argName := range funcData.argNames {
  233. link += argName + "=_"
  234. if i < len(funcData.argNames)-1 {
  235. link += "&"
  236. }
  237. }
  238. buf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("<a href=\"%s\">%s</a></br>", link, link))
  239. }
  240. buf.WriteString("</body></html>")
  241. w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "text/html")
  242. w.WriteHeader(200)
  243. w.Write(buf.Bytes()) // nolint: errcheck
  244. }