You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

232 lines
7.9 KiB

rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc: add support for batched requests/responses (#3534) Continues from #3280 in building support for batched requests/responses in the JSON RPC (as per issue #3213). * Add JSON RPC batching for client and server As per #3213, this adds support for [JSON RPC batch requests and responses](https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#batch). * Add additional checks to ensure client responses are the same as results * Fix case where a notification is sent and no response is expected * Add test to check that JSON RPC notifications in a batch are left out in responses * Update CHANGELOG_PENDING.md * Update PR number now that PR has been created * Make errors start with lowercase letter * Refactor batch functionality to be standalone This refactors the batching functionality to rather act in a standalone way. In light of supporting concurrent goroutines making use of the same client, it would make sense to have batching functionality where one could create a batch of requests per goroutine and send that batch without interfering with a batch from another goroutine. * Add examples for simple and batch HTTP client usage * Check errors from writer and remove nolinter directives * Make error strings start with lowercase letter * Refactor examples to make them testable * Use safer deferred shutdown for example Tendermint test node * Recompose rpcClient interface from pre-existing interface components * Rename WaitGroup for brevity * Replace empty ID string with request ID * Remove extraneous test case * Convert first letter of errors.Wrap() messages to lowercase * Remove extraneous function parameter * Make variable declaration terse * Reorder WaitGroup.Done call to help prevent race conditions in the face of failure * Swap mutex to value representation and remove initialization * Restore empty JSONRPC string ID in response to prevent nil * Make JSONRPCBufferedRequest private * Revert PR hard link in CHANGELOG_PENDING * Add client ID for JSONRPCClient This adds code to automatically generate a randomized client ID for the JSONRPCClient, and adds a check of the IDs in the responses (if one was set in the requests). * Extract response ID validation into separate function * Remove extraneous comments * Reorder fields to indicate clearly which are protected by the mutex * Refactor for loop to remove indexing * Restructure and combine loop * Flatten conditional block for better readability * Make multi-variable declaration slightly more readable * Change for loop style * Compress error check statements * Make function description more generic to show that we support different protocols * Preallocate memory for request and result objects
6 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc: add support for batched requests/responses (#3534) Continues from #3280 in building support for batched requests/responses in the JSON RPC (as per issue #3213). * Add JSON RPC batching for client and server As per #3213, this adds support for [JSON RPC batch requests and responses](https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#batch). * Add additional checks to ensure client responses are the same as results * Fix case where a notification is sent and no response is expected * Add test to check that JSON RPC notifications in a batch are left out in responses * Update CHANGELOG_PENDING.md * Update PR number now that PR has been created * Make errors start with lowercase letter * Refactor batch functionality to be standalone This refactors the batching functionality to rather act in a standalone way. In light of supporting concurrent goroutines making use of the same client, it would make sense to have batching functionality where one could create a batch of requests per goroutine and send that batch without interfering with a batch from another goroutine. * Add examples for simple and batch HTTP client usage * Check errors from writer and remove nolinter directives * Make error strings start with lowercase letter * Refactor examples to make them testable * Use safer deferred shutdown for example Tendermint test node * Recompose rpcClient interface from pre-existing interface components * Rename WaitGroup for brevity * Replace empty ID string with request ID * Remove extraneous test case * Convert first letter of errors.Wrap() messages to lowercase * Remove extraneous function parameter * Make variable declaration terse * Reorder WaitGroup.Done call to help prevent race conditions in the face of failure * Swap mutex to value representation and remove initialization * Restore empty JSONRPC string ID in response to prevent nil * Make JSONRPCBufferedRequest private * Revert PR hard link in CHANGELOG_PENDING * Add client ID for JSONRPCClient This adds code to automatically generate a randomized client ID for the JSONRPCClient, and adds a check of the IDs in the responses (if one was set in the requests). * Extract response ID validation into separate function * Remove extraneous comments * Reorder fields to indicate clearly which are protected by the mutex * Refactor for loop to remove indexing * Restructure and combine loop * Flatten conditional block for better readability * Make multi-variable declaration slightly more readable * Change for loop style * Compress error check statements * Make function description more generic to show that we support different protocols * Preallocate memory for request and result objects
6 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc: add support for batched requests/responses (#3534) Continues from #3280 in building support for batched requests/responses in the JSON RPC (as per issue #3213). * Add JSON RPC batching for client and server As per #3213, this adds support for [JSON RPC batch requests and responses](https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#batch). * Add additional checks to ensure client responses are the same as results * Fix case where a notification is sent and no response is expected * Add test to check that JSON RPC notifications in a batch are left out in responses * Update CHANGELOG_PENDING.md * Update PR number now that PR has been created * Make errors start with lowercase letter * Refactor batch functionality to be standalone This refactors the batching functionality to rather act in a standalone way. In light of supporting concurrent goroutines making use of the same client, it would make sense to have batching functionality where one could create a batch of requests per goroutine and send that batch without interfering with a batch from another goroutine. * Add examples for simple and batch HTTP client usage * Check errors from writer and remove nolinter directives * Make error strings start with lowercase letter * Refactor examples to make them testable * Use safer deferred shutdown for example Tendermint test node * Recompose rpcClient interface from pre-existing interface components * Rename WaitGroup for brevity * Replace empty ID string with request ID * Remove extraneous test case * Convert first letter of errors.Wrap() messages to lowercase * Remove extraneous function parameter * Make variable declaration terse * Reorder WaitGroup.Done call to help prevent race conditions in the face of failure * Swap mutex to value representation and remove initialization * Restore empty JSONRPC string ID in response to prevent nil * Make JSONRPCBufferedRequest private * Revert PR hard link in CHANGELOG_PENDING * Add client ID for JSONRPCClient This adds code to automatically generate a randomized client ID for the JSONRPCClient, and adds a check of the IDs in the responses (if one was set in the requests). * Extract response ID validation into separate function * Remove extraneous comments * Reorder fields to indicate clearly which are protected by the mutex * Refactor for loop to remove indexing * Restructure and combine loop * Flatten conditional block for better readability * Make multi-variable declaration slightly more readable * Change for loop style * Compress error check statements * Make function description more generic to show that we support different protocols * Preallocate memory for request and result objects
6 years ago
rpc/lib/client & server: try to conform to JSON-RPC 2.0 spec (#4141) https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification What is done in this PR: JSONRPCClient: validate that Response.ID matches Request.ID I wanted to do the same for the WSClient, but since we're sending events as responses, not notifications, checking IDs would require storing them in memory indefinitely (and we won't be able to remove them upon client unsubscribing because ID is different then). Request.ID is now optional. Notification is a Request without an ID. Previously "" or 0 were considered as notifications Remove #event suffix from ID from an event response (partially fixes #2949) ID must be either string, int or null AND must be equal to request's ID. Now, because we've implemented events as responses, WS clients are tripping when they see Response.ID("0#event") != Request.ID("0"). Implementing events as requests would require a lot of time (~ 2 days to completely rewrite WS client and server) generate unique ID for each request switch to integer IDs instead of "json-client-XYZ" id=0 method=/subscribe id=0 result=... id=1 method=/abci_query id=1 result=... > send events (resulting from /subscribe) as requests+notifications (not responses) this will require a lot of work. probably not worth it * rpc: generate an unique ID for each request in conformance with JSON-RPC spec * WSClient: check for unsolicited responses * fix golangci warnings * save commit * fix errors * remove ID from responses from subscribe Refs #2949 * clients are safe for concurrent access * tm-bench: switch to int ID * fixes after my own review * comment out sentIDs in WSClient see commit body for the reason * remove body.Close it will be closed automatically * stop ws connection outside of write/read routines also, use t.Rate in tm-bench indexer when calculating ID fix gocritic issues * update swagger.yaml * Apply suggestions from code review * fix stylecheck and golint linter warnings * update changelog * update changelog2
5 years ago
rpc: add support for batched requests/responses (#3534) Continues from #3280 in building support for batched requests/responses in the JSON RPC (as per issue #3213). * Add JSON RPC batching for client and server As per #3213, this adds support for [JSON RPC batch requests and responses](https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#batch). * Add additional checks to ensure client responses are the same as results * Fix case where a notification is sent and no response is expected * Add test to check that JSON RPC notifications in a batch are left out in responses * Update CHANGELOG_PENDING.md * Update PR number now that PR has been created * Make errors start with lowercase letter * Refactor batch functionality to be standalone This refactors the batching functionality to rather act in a standalone way. In light of supporting concurrent goroutines making use of the same client, it would make sense to have batching functionality where one could create a batch of requests per goroutine and send that batch without interfering with a batch from another goroutine. * Add examples for simple and batch HTTP client usage * Check errors from writer and remove nolinter directives * Make error strings start with lowercase letter * Refactor examples to make them testable * Use safer deferred shutdown for example Tendermint test node * Recompose rpcClient interface from pre-existing interface components * Rename WaitGroup for brevity * Replace empty ID string with request ID * Remove extraneous test case * Convert first letter of errors.Wrap() messages to lowercase * Remove extraneous function parameter * Make variable declaration terse * Reorder WaitGroup.Done call to help prevent race conditions in the face of failure * Swap mutex to value representation and remove initialization * Restore empty JSONRPC string ID in response to prevent nil * Make JSONRPCBufferedRequest private * Revert PR hard link in CHANGELOG_PENDING * Add client ID for JSONRPCClient This adds code to automatically generate a randomized client ID for the JSONRPCClient, and adds a check of the IDs in the responses (if one was set in the requests). * Extract response ID validation into separate function * Remove extraneous comments * Reorder fields to indicate clearly which are protected by the mutex * Refactor for loop to remove indexing * Restructure and combine loop * Flatten conditional block for better readability * Make multi-variable declaration slightly more readable * Change for loop style * Compress error check statements * Make function description more generic to show that we support different protocols * Preallocate memory for request and result objects
6 years ago
rpc: add support for batched requests/responses (#3534) Continues from #3280 in building support for batched requests/responses in the JSON RPC (as per issue #3213). * Add JSON RPC batching for client and server As per #3213, this adds support for [JSON RPC batch requests and responses](https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#batch). * Add additional checks to ensure client responses are the same as results * Fix case where a notification is sent and no response is expected * Add test to check that JSON RPC notifications in a batch are left out in responses * Update CHANGELOG_PENDING.md * Update PR number now that PR has been created * Make errors start with lowercase letter * Refactor batch functionality to be standalone This refactors the batching functionality to rather act in a standalone way. In light of supporting concurrent goroutines making use of the same client, it would make sense to have batching functionality where one could create a batch of requests per goroutine and send that batch without interfering with a batch from another goroutine. * Add examples for simple and batch HTTP client usage * Check errors from writer and remove nolinter directives * Make error strings start with lowercase letter * Refactor examples to make them testable * Use safer deferred shutdown for example Tendermint test node * Recompose rpcClient interface from pre-existing interface components * Rename WaitGroup for brevity * Replace empty ID string with request ID * Remove extraneous test case * Convert first letter of errors.Wrap() messages to lowercase * Remove extraneous function parameter * Make variable declaration terse * Reorder WaitGroup.Done call to help prevent race conditions in the face of failure * Swap mutex to value representation and remove initialization * Restore empty JSONRPC string ID in response to prevent nil * Make JSONRPCBufferedRequest private * Revert PR hard link in CHANGELOG_PENDING * Add client ID for JSONRPCClient This adds code to automatically generate a randomized client ID for the JSONRPCClient, and adds a check of the IDs in the responses (if one was set in the requests). * Extract response ID validation into separate function * Remove extraneous comments * Reorder fields to indicate clearly which are protected by the mutex * Refactor for loop to remove indexing * Restructure and combine loop * Flatten conditional block for better readability * Make multi-variable declaration slightly more readable * Change for loop style * Compress error check statements * Make function description more generic to show that we support different protocols * Preallocate memory for request and result objects
6 years ago
  1. package rpcserver
  2. import (
  3. "bytes"
  4. "encoding/json"
  5. "io/ioutil"
  6. "net/http"
  7. "net/http/httptest"
  8. "strings"
  9. "testing"
  10. "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
  11. "github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
  12. amino "github.com/tendermint/go-amino"
  13. "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/log"
  14. types "github.com/tendermint/tendermint/rpc/lib/types"
  15. )
  16. func testMux() *http.ServeMux {
  17. funcMap := map[string]*RPCFunc{
  18. "c": NewRPCFunc(func(ctx *types.Context, s string, i int) (string, error) { return "foo", nil }, "s,i"),
  19. }
  20. cdc := amino.NewCodec()
  21. mux := http.NewServeMux()
  22. buf := new(bytes.Buffer)
  23. logger := log.NewTMLogger(buf)
  24. RegisterRPCFuncs(mux, funcMap, cdc, logger)
  25. return mux
  26. }
  27. func statusOK(code int) bool { return code >= 200 && code <= 299 }
  28. // Ensure that nefarious/unintended inputs to `params`
  29. // do not crash our RPC handlers.
  30. // See Issue https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/issues/708.
  31. func TestRPCParams(t *testing.T) {
  32. mux := testMux()
  33. tests := []struct {
  34. payload string
  35. wantErr string
  36. expectedID interface{}
  37. }{
  38. // bad
  39. {`{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": "0"}`, "Method not found", types.JSONRPCStringID("0")},
  40. {`{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "y", "id": "0"}`, "Method not found", types.JSONRPCStringID("0")},
  41. // id not captured in JSON parsing failures
  42. {`{"method": "c", "id": "0", "params": a}`, "invalid character", nil},
  43. {`{"method": "c", "id": "0", "params": ["a"]}`, "got 1", types.JSONRPCStringID("0")},
  44. {`{"method": "c", "id": "0", "params": ["a", "b"]}`, "invalid character", types.JSONRPCStringID("0")},
  45. {`{"method": "c", "id": "0", "params": [1, 1]}`, "of type string", types.JSONRPCStringID("0")},
  46. // no ID - notification
  47. // {`{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "c", "params": ["a", "10"]}`, false, nil},
  48. // good
  49. {`{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "c", "id": "0", "params": null}`, "", types.JSONRPCStringID("0")},
  50. {`{"method": "c", "id": "0", "params": {}}`, "", types.JSONRPCStringID("0")},
  51. {`{"method": "c", "id": "0", "params": ["a", "10"]}`, "", types.JSONRPCStringID("0")},
  52. }
  53. for i, tt := range tests {
  54. req, _ := http.NewRequest("POST", "http://localhost/", strings.NewReader(tt.payload))
  55. rec := httptest.NewRecorder()
  56. mux.ServeHTTP(rec, req)
  57. res := rec.Result()
  58. defer res.Body.Close()
  59. // Always expecting back a JSONRPCResponse
  60. assert.True(t, statusOK(res.StatusCode), "#%d: should always return 2XX", i)
  61. blob, err := ioutil.ReadAll(res.Body)
  62. if err != nil {
  63. t.Errorf("#%d: err reading body: %v", i, err)
  64. continue
  65. }
  66. recv := new(types.RPCResponse)
  67. assert.Nil(t, json.Unmarshal(blob, recv), "#%d: expecting successful parsing of an RPCResponse:\nblob: %s", i, blob)
  68. assert.NotEqual(t, recv, new(types.RPCResponse), "#%d: not expecting a blank RPCResponse", i)
  69. assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedID, recv.ID, "#%d: expected ID not matched in RPCResponse", i)
  70. if tt.wantErr == "" {
  71. assert.Nil(t, recv.Error, "#%d: not expecting an error", i)
  72. } else {
  73. assert.True(t, recv.Error.Code < 0, "#%d: not expecting a positive JSONRPC code", i)
  74. // The wanted error is either in the message or the data
  75. assert.Contains(t, recv.Error.Message+recv.Error.Data, tt.wantErr, "#%d: expected substring", i)
  76. }
  77. }
  78. }
  79. func TestJSONRPCID(t *testing.T) {
  80. mux := testMux()
  81. tests := []struct {
  82. payload string
  83. wantErr bool
  84. expectedID interface{}
  85. }{
  86. // good id
  87. {`{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "c", "id": "0", "params": ["a", "10"]}`, false, types.JSONRPCStringID("0")},
  88. {`{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "c", "id": "abc", "params": ["a", "10"]}`, false, types.JSONRPCStringID("abc")},
  89. {`{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "c", "id": 0, "params": ["a", "10"]}`, false, types.JSONRPCIntID(0)},
  90. {`{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "c", "id": 1, "params": ["a", "10"]}`, false, types.JSONRPCIntID(1)},
  91. {`{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "c", "id": 1.3, "params": ["a", "10"]}`, false, types.JSONRPCIntID(1)},
  92. {`{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "c", "id": -1, "params": ["a", "10"]}`, false, types.JSONRPCIntID(-1)},
  93. // bad id
  94. {`{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "c", "id": {}, "params": ["a", "10"]}`, true, nil},
  95. {`{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "c", "id": [], "params": ["a", "10"]}`, true, nil},
  96. }
  97. for i, tt := range tests {
  98. req, _ := http.NewRequest("POST", "http://localhost/", strings.NewReader(tt.payload))
  99. rec := httptest.NewRecorder()
  100. mux.ServeHTTP(rec, req)
  101. res := rec.Result()
  102. // Always expecting back a JSONRPCResponse
  103. assert.True(t, statusOK(res.StatusCode), "#%d: should always return 2XX", i)
  104. blob, err := ioutil.ReadAll(res.Body)
  105. if err != nil {
  106. t.Errorf("#%d: err reading body: %v", i, err)
  107. continue
  108. }
  109. res.Body.Close()
  110. recv := new(types.RPCResponse)
  111. err = json.Unmarshal(blob, recv)
  112. assert.Nil(t, err, "#%d: expecting successful parsing of an RPCResponse:\nblob: %s", i, blob)
  113. if !tt.wantErr {
  114. assert.NotEqual(t, recv, new(types.RPCResponse), "#%d: not expecting a blank RPCResponse", i)
  115. assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedID, recv.ID, "#%d: expected ID not matched in RPCResponse", i)
  116. assert.Nil(t, recv.Error, "#%d: not expecting an error", i)
  117. } else {
  118. assert.True(t, recv.Error.Code < 0, "#%d: not expecting a positive JSONRPC code", i)
  119. }
  120. }
  121. }
  122. func TestRPCNotification(t *testing.T) {
  123. mux := testMux()
  124. body := strings.NewReader(`{"jsonrpc": "2.0"}`)
  125. req, _ := http.NewRequest("POST", "http://localhost/", body)
  126. rec := httptest.NewRecorder()
  127. mux.ServeHTTP(rec, req)
  128. res := rec.Result()
  129. // Always expecting back a JSONRPCResponse
  130. require.True(t, statusOK(res.StatusCode), "should always return 2XX")
  131. blob, err := ioutil.ReadAll(res.Body)
  132. res.Body.Close()
  133. require.Nil(t, err, "reading from the body should not give back an error")
  134. require.Equal(t, len(blob), 0, "a notification SHOULD NOT be responded to by the server")
  135. }
  136. func TestRPCNotificationInBatch(t *testing.T) {
  137. mux := testMux()
  138. tests := []struct {
  139. payload string
  140. expectCount int
  141. }{
  142. {
  143. `[
  144. {"jsonrpc": "2.0"},
  145. {"jsonrpc": "2.0","method":"c","id":"abc","params":["a","10"]}
  146. ]`,
  147. 1,
  148. },
  149. {
  150. `[
  151. {"jsonrpc": "2.0"},
  152. {"jsonrpc": "2.0","method":"c","id":"abc","params":["a","10"]},
  153. {"jsonrpc": "2.0"},
  154. {"jsonrpc": "2.0","method":"c","id":"abc","params":["a","10"]}
  155. ]`,
  156. 2,
  157. },
  158. }
  159. for i, tt := range tests {
  160. req, _ := http.NewRequest("POST", "http://localhost/", strings.NewReader(tt.payload))
  161. rec := httptest.NewRecorder()
  162. mux.ServeHTTP(rec, req)
  163. res := rec.Result()
  164. // Always expecting back a JSONRPCResponse
  165. assert.True(t, statusOK(res.StatusCode), "#%d: should always return 2XX", i)
  166. blob, err := ioutil.ReadAll(res.Body)
  167. if err != nil {
  168. t.Errorf("#%d: err reading body: %v", i, err)
  169. continue
  170. }
  171. res.Body.Close()
  172. var responses []types.RPCResponse
  173. // try to unmarshal an array first
  174. err = json.Unmarshal(blob, &responses)
  175. if err != nil {
  176. // if we were actually expecting an array, but got an error
  177. if tt.expectCount > 1 {
  178. t.Errorf("#%d: expected an array, couldn't unmarshal it\nblob: %s", i, blob)
  179. continue
  180. } else {
  181. // we were expecting an error here, so let's unmarshal a single response
  182. var response types.RPCResponse
  183. err = json.Unmarshal(blob, &response)
  184. if err != nil {
  185. t.Errorf("#%d: expected successful parsing of an RPCResponse\nblob: %s", i, blob)
  186. continue
  187. }
  188. // have a single-element result
  189. responses = []types.RPCResponse{response}
  190. }
  191. }
  192. if tt.expectCount != len(responses) {
  193. t.Errorf("#%d: expected %d response(s), but got %d\nblob: %s", i, tt.expectCount, len(responses), blob)
  194. continue
  195. }
  196. for _, response := range responses {
  197. assert.NotEqual(t, response, new(types.RPCResponse), "#%d: not expecting a blank RPCResponse", i)
  198. }
  199. }
  200. }
  201. func TestUnknownRPCPath(t *testing.T) {
  202. mux := testMux()
  203. req, _ := http.NewRequest("GET", "http://localhost/unknownrpcpath", nil)
  204. rec := httptest.NewRecorder()
  205. mux.ServeHTTP(rec, req)
  206. res := rec.Result()
  207. // Always expecting back a 404 error
  208. require.Equal(t, http.StatusNotFound, res.StatusCode, "should always return 404")
  209. res.Body.Close()
  210. }