- # Mempool
-
- ## Transaction ordering
-
- Currently, there's no ordering of transactions other than the order they've
- arrived (via RPC or from other nodes).
-
- So the only way to specify the order is to send them to a single node.
-
- valA:
- - tx1
- - tx2
- - tx3
-
- If the transactions are split up across different nodes, there's no way to
- ensure they are processed in the expected order.
-
- valA:
- - tx1
- - tx2
-
- valB:
- - tx3
-
- If valB is the proposer, the order might be:
-
- - tx3
- - tx1
- - tx2
-
- If valA is the proposer, the order might be:
-
- - tx1
- - tx2
- - tx3
-
- That said, if the transactions contain some internal value, like an
- order/nonce/sequence number, the application can reject transactions that are
- out of order. So if a node receives tx3, then tx1, it can reject tx3 and then
- accept tx1. The sender can then retry sending tx3, which should probably be
- rejected until the node has seen tx2.
|